Robotic treatment of giant adrenal myelolipoma: A case report and review of the literature.

adrenal masses adrenal myelolipoma benign adrenal tumour giant myelolipoma mesenchymal tumour partial adrenalectomy robotic adrenalectomy robotic surgery robotic transperitoneal adrenalectomy

Journal

Molecular and clinical oncology
ISSN: 2049-9450
Titre abrégé: Mol Clin Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101613422

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2019
Historique:
received: 09 08 2018
accepted: 13 02 2019
entrez: 23 4 2019
pubmed: 23 4 2019
medline: 23 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Adrenal myelolipoma is a rare mesenchymal tumour with benign biological behaviour that is mainly composed of mature adipose and myeloid tissue. Both sexes are equally affected, most commonly between the fifth and seventh decades of life. The diagnosis of adrenal myelolipoma is mostly incidental. Although it may occasionally be associated with necrosis, rupture and haemorrhage, causing abdominal pain, this tumour is usually asymptomatic. Consequently, management is conservative, while surgical treatment is reserved for symptomatic cases, or for masses growing quickly or to a size >6 cm. Giant myelolipomas (sized >10 cm) are rare. Open radical adrenalectomy is the standard treatment for giant myelolipomas, while the minimally invasive approach has been used in only few cases. We herein report the case of a patient with a giant adrenal myelolipoma who underwent robotic partial adrenalectomy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest giant adrenal myelolipoma treated with robotic surgery reported in the literature to date. A 55-year-old male patient underwent an abdominal computed tomography scan during follow-up after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer Gleason Score 6 (ISUP 1) due to biochemical recurrence. The examination revealed a right hypodense adrenal mass, sized 16×13 cm. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the presence of characteristics suggestive of a myelolipoma. The patient did not report any symptoms. Due to the benign characteristics of the mass, robotic partial adrenalectomy and enucleation of the mass were performed. The operative time and estimated blood loss were 205 min and 100 ml, respectively. No intra- or postoperative complications occurred. The patient was mobilized on the first postoperative day and the time to flatus was 36 h; the length of hospitalization was 4 days. Histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of adrenal myelolipoma, sized 18×11.5×6 cm. No tumour recurrence occurred over a follow-up period of 12 months. In conclusion, robotic surgery allows performing partial adrenalectomy with a lower risk of bleeding and with preservation of healthy adrenal tissue, which is of paramount importance for the patient as it reduces recovery time and the need for medical substitution therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31007910
doi: 10.3892/mco.2019.1823
pii: MCO-0-0-1823
pmc: PMC6467000
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

492-496

Références

BJU Int. 2004 Feb;93(3):357-9
pubmed: 14764137
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Sep;20(3):483-99
pubmed: 16980207
Surgery. 2008 Dec;144(6):995-1001; discussion 1001
pubmed: 19041009
Endocr Pract. 2009 Jul-Aug;15 Suppl 1:1-20
pubmed: 19632967
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jul;19(7):2288-94
pubmed: 22396002
Onco Targets Ther. 2013 Apr 10;6:355-60
pubmed: 23596352
Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1154-61
pubmed: 24079955
Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Mar-Apr;8(3-4):E132-6
pubmed: 24678351
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5(8):494-6
pubmed: 24995663
Case Rep Surg. 2014;2014:728198
pubmed: 25140269
Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2014 Mar 01;30(1):28-33
pubmed: 25931887
Gland Surg. 2015 Oct;4(5):447-8
pubmed: 26425459
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Nov;401(7):999-1006
pubmed: 27516077
Medicina (B Aires). 2016;76(4):249-50
pubmed: 27576286
J Robot Surg. 2010 Sep;4(3):149-54
pubmed: 27638754
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Dec;57(Suppl 2):S130-S146
pubmed: 27995217
Int J Surg. 2017 Feb;38:95-104
pubmed: 28043926
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2017 Jan-Feb;112(1):58-62
pubmed: 28266294
Endocr Pathol. 2017 Sep;28(3):213-227
pubmed: 28477311
Updates Surg. 2017 Jun;69(2):127-133
pubmed: 28497219
Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Sep-Oct;43(5):997
pubmed: 28537695
BMC Surg. 2018 Jun 13;18(1):40
pubmed: 29895293
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 30;12:CD011668
pubmed: 30595004

Auteurs

Giovanni Cochetti (G)

Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Inter-Divisional Urology Clinic (Perugia-Terni), Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, I-06156 Perugia, Italy.

Alessio Paladini (A)

Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Inter-Divisional Urology Clinic (Perugia-Terni), Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, I-06156 Perugia, Italy.

Andrea Boni (A)

Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Inter-Divisional Urology Clinic (Perugia-Terni), Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, I-06156 Perugia, Italy.

Elisa Silvi (E)

Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Inter-Divisional Urology Clinic (Perugia-Terni), Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, I-06156 Perugia, Italy.

Alberto Tiezzi (A)

Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Inter-Divisional Urology Clinic (Perugia-Terni), Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, I-06156 Perugia, Italy.

Jacopo Adolfo Rossi De Vermandois (JAR)

Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Inter-Divisional Urology Clinic (Perugia-Terni), Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, I-06156 Perugia, Italy.

Ettore Mearini (E)

Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Inter-Divisional Urology Clinic (Perugia-Terni), Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, I-06156 Perugia, Italy.

Classifications MeSH