Influence of hemodialysis on pramipexole pharmacokinetics: Lessons from two cases and literature review.

hemodialysis pharmacokinetics pramipexole

Journal

Clinical nephrology. Case studies
ISSN: 2196-5293
Titre abrégé: Clin Nephrol Case Stud
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101638685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 28 08 2018
accepted: 08 01 2019
entrez: 23 4 2019
pubmed: 23 4 2019
medline: 23 4 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is not a rare condition in patients on long-term dialysis. Pramipexole is a small molecule used in the treatment of idiopathic and uremic RLS. Although some information concerning the efficacy and safety of pramipexole in uremic patients is available, data concerning the pharmacokinetics of pramipexole in hemodialysis (HD) are lacking. Following the occurrence of accidental pramipexole intoxication in a chronic HD patient, we were concerned about the efficacy of HD in removing pramipexole. Our aim was thus to assess plasma pramipexole concentrations and pramipexole clearance in a stable chronic HD patient without any residual kidney function. Our patient was a 63-year-old man on chronic HD for 5 years who had been treated uneventfully with oral pramipexole for uremic RLS since then. During a routine 4-hour high-flux HD session, blood, ultrafiltrate, and dialysate samples were collected every hour to determine pramipexole concentrations over time. Pramipexole blood concentrations ranged from 12.1 to 23.9 µg/L. Pramipexole reduction ratio was 32.5%. Mean dialytic clearance of pramipexole was 76.8 mL/min. Postdialysis rebound was 5.6%. In the absence of any side effect, pramipexole blood concentrations at steady state were 2- to 4-fold higher than those observed in subjects with normal kidney function. Like other drugs with a high volume of distribution, pramipexole was poorly removed by HD. Therefore, HD is not recommended as a treatment option for pramipexole intoxication in patients with a glomerular filtration rate superior to 30 mL/min/1.73m².

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is not a rare condition in patients on long-term dialysis. Pramipexole is a small molecule used in the treatment of idiopathic and uremic RLS. Although some information concerning the efficacy and safety of pramipexole in uremic patients is available, data concerning the pharmacokinetics of pramipexole in hemodialysis (HD) are lacking. Following the occurrence of accidental pramipexole intoxication in a chronic HD patient, we were concerned about the efficacy of HD in removing pramipexole. Our aim was thus to assess plasma pramipexole concentrations and pramipexole clearance in a stable chronic HD patient without any residual kidney function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
Our patient was a 63-year-old man on chronic HD for 5 years who had been treated uneventfully with oral pramipexole for uremic RLS since then. During a routine 4-hour high-flux HD session, blood, ultrafiltrate, and dialysate samples were collected every hour to determine pramipexole concentrations over time.
RESULTS RESULTS
Pramipexole blood concentrations ranged from 12.1 to 23.9 µg/L. Pramipexole reduction ratio was 32.5%. Mean dialytic clearance of pramipexole was 76.8 mL/min. Postdialysis rebound was 5.6%.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In the absence of any side effect, pramipexole blood concentrations at steady state were 2- to 4-fold higher than those observed in subjects with normal kidney function. Like other drugs with a high volume of distribution, pramipexole was poorly removed by HD. Therefore, HD is not recommended as a treatment option for pramipexole intoxication in patients with a glomerular filtration rate superior to 30 mL/min/1.73m².

Identifiants

pubmed: 31008016
doi: 10.5414/CNCS109641
pmc: PMC6448051
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

11-16

Références

Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41(4):261-309
pubmed: 11978145
Neurology. 2004 Mar 9;62(5):831-2
pubmed: 15007148
Am J Kidney Dis. 2004 May;43(5):763-71
pubmed: 15112166
Drugs. 2006;66(5):607-24
pubmed: 16620140
CNS Drugs. 2007;21(5):429-37; discussion 438-40
pubmed: 17447832
Acta Neurol Taiwan. 2008 Jun;17(2):109-11
pubmed: 18686651
J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Dec;54(12):1383-90
pubmed: 24965504
Neurology. 2016 Dec 13;87(24):2585-2593
pubmed: 27856776
J Med Toxicol. 2017 Dec;13(4):343-346
pubmed: 28547577
J Clin Pharmacol. 1997 Jun;37(6):520-5
pubmed: 9208359

Auteurs

Nicolas Hanset (N)

Department of Nephrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain Brussels.

Philippe Hantson (P)

Department of Intensive Care, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc.
Louvain Center for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium, and.

Franck Saint-Marcoux (F)

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France.

Arnaud Devresse (A)

Department of Nephrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain Brussels.

Michel Jadoul (M)

Department of Nephrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain Brussels.

Laura Labriola (L)

Department of Nephrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain Brussels.

Classifications MeSH