Duration of Immunity and Effectiveness of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Acellular Pertussis Vaccines in Children.
Age Factors
Child
Child, Preschool
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines
/ immunology
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Immunity, Innate
Immunization Schedule
Immunization, Secondary
/ methods
Incidence
Male
Models, Theoretical
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
United States
/ epidemiology
Whooping Cough
/ epidemiology
Journal
JAMA pediatrics
ISSN: 2168-6211
Titre abrégé: JAMA Pediatr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589544
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2019
01 06 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
23
4
2019
medline:
23
2
2020
entrez:
23
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The United States has experienced a nationwide resurgence of pertussis since the mid-1970s, despite high estimated vaccine coverage. Short-lived immunity induced by diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines in young children is widely believed to be responsible for this growing burden, but the duration of protection conferred by DTaP vaccines remains incompletely quantified. To assess the duration of immunity and the effectiveness of DTaP vaccines in US children. A mathematical, age-structured model of pertussis transmission, previously validated empirically on incidence data in Massachusetts, was used in this simulation study to assess the duration of DTaP immunity most consistent with the empirical values of the relative increase in the odds of acquiring pertussis from recent epidemiologic studies in the United States. The study included 5 simulated cohorts of children born between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2005, followed up between the ages of 5 and 9 years (study period, January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2014). Statistical analysis was performed from May 1 to December 1, 2017. Vaccination with DTaP according to the US immunization schedule, with a range of assumptions regarding the degree of waning immunity. Vaccine effectiveness and relative change in the odds of acquiring pertussis (odds ratio) in children aged 5 to 9 years, duration of DTaP immunity, and vaccine population-level impact. This study found a marked association between the degree of waning immunity, vaccine effectiveness, and the odds ratio. Counterintuitively, the odds ratio was positively associated with vaccine effectiveness, as a consequence of nonlinear, age-assortative transmission dynamics. Based on the empirical odds ratios (1.33; 95% CI, 1.23-1.43), it was estimated that vaccine effectiveness exceeded 75% in children aged 5 to 9 years and that more than 65% of children remained immune to pertussis 5 years after the last DTaP dose. The results of this study suggest that temporal trends in the odds of acquiring pertussis are an unreliable measure of the durability of vaccine-induced protection. They further demonstrate that DTaP vaccines confer imperfect, but long-lived protection. Control strategies should be based on the best available estimates of vaccine properties and the age structure of the transmission network.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31009031
pii: 2731128
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0711
pmc: PMC6547082
doi:
Substances chimiques
Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
588-594Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI101155
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : U54 GM111274
Pays : United States
Références
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 18;13(6):e0197970
pubmed: 29912887
Epidemiol Infect. 2014 Apr;142(4):672-84
pubmed: 23324361
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jan;18(1):5-6
pubmed: 29066129
Trends Microbiol. 2012 May;20(5):211-3
pubmed: 22494804
JAMA. 2003 Dec 10;290(22):2968-75
pubmed: 14665658
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;(3):CD001478
pubmed: 22419280
J Infect Dis. 2014 Jun 15;209(12):1981-8
pubmed: 24443545
Epidemiol Infect. 1988 Jun;100(3):419-42
pubmed: 3378585
Pathog Dis. 2015 Nov;73(8):ftv057
pubmed: 26253079
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;17(9):974-980
pubmed: 28623146
Epidemics. 2011 Sep;3(3-4):183-8
pubmed: 22094341
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006 Mar 24;55(RR-3):1-34
pubmed: 16557217
Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Aug;16(8):1273-8
pubmed: 20678322
Immunology. 1998 Jan;93(1):1-10
pubmed: 9536112
Pediatrics. 2013 Apr;131(4):e1047-52
pubmed: 23478868
Rev Infect Dis. 1987 Sep-Oct;9(5):866-83
pubmed: 3317732
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 13;283(1822):
pubmed: 26763701
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 1;63(suppl 4):S221-S226
pubmed: 27838676
Sci Transl Med. 2018 Mar 28;10(434):
pubmed: 29593103
Pediatrics. 2015 Feb;135(2):331-43
pubmed: 25560446
BMC Med. 2016 Sep 01;14(1):121
pubmed: 27580649
J Infect Dis. 2014 Apr 1;209 Suppl 1:S32-5
pubmed: 24626870
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 29;65(12):1977-1983
pubmed: 29028938
Lancet. 1982 Mar 20;1(8273):666-9
pubmed: 6121976
Vaccine. 2017 Jun 8;35(26):3395-3400
pubmed: 28506516
SIAM J Appl Math. 2014;74(6):1810-1830
pubmed: 25878365
Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Mar;14(3):708-19
pubmed: 1562663
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):1012-9
pubmed: 22970945
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Apr 23;11(4):e1004138
pubmed: 25906150
Trends Microbiol. 2014 Feb;22(2):49-52
pubmed: 24485284
MMWR Recomm Rep. 1992 Feb 7;41(RR-1):1-10
pubmed: 1741009
Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Jun;28(6):1230-7
pubmed: 10451158
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Feb 18;111(7):E716-7
pubmed: 24516173
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017 Dec;16(12):1175-1179
pubmed: 29041826
Pediatrics. 2016 Mar;137(3):e20153326
pubmed: 26908667
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jan 1;54(1):78-84
pubmed: 22075790
JAMA. 2012 Nov 28;308(20):2126-32
pubmed: 23188029
JAMA. 2012 Aug 1;308(5):454-6
pubmed: 22851107
Lancet. 2000 Jan 22;355(9200):285-6
pubmed: 10675078
Science. 2010 Nov 12;330(6006):982-5
pubmed: 21071671
MMWR Recomm Rep. 1997 Mar 28;46(RR-7):1-25
pubmed: 9091780
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 14;111(2):787-92
pubmed: 24277828