Assessment on reticuloendotheliosis virus infection in specific-pathogen-free chickens based on detection of yolk antibody.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
22
06
2018
accepted:
05
03
2019
entrez:
23
4
2019
pubmed:
23
4
2019
medline:
1
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV) is the most frequent exogenous virus that contaminates attenuated vaccines. Therefore, it is extremely important to select REV-free specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chicken embryos. Generally, REV infection is assessed by detecting REV antibodies in SPF chickens. This present study seeks to evaluate REV infection by replacing serum antibody detection with yolk antibody detection. A cohort of 40 nineteen-week-old SPF chickens were artificially inoculated with REV, with 32 SPF chickens raised in another isolation environment served as a blank control. Eggs and serum from 23-week-old chickens were sampled, and yolks were diluted separately to ratios of 1:150, 1:200, 1:300 and 1:400, which were detected together with serum. We found that the yolk antibody detection findings at a dilution of 1:300 had the highest coincidence rate compared with that based on serum antibody measurements. At a dilution ratio of 1:300 for yolk antibody, 72 chickens were continuously observed for 10 weeks from 25- to 34-weeks-old. Our findings were based on serum antibody or yolk antibody detection, and the evaluation results were completely consistent. Therefore, all serum antibody-positive chickens were yolk antibody-positive, and vice versa. Accordingly, vaccine producers can estimate REV cleanliness in a poultry farm by sampling yolk antibody titers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31009463
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213978
pii: PONE-D-18-18662
pmc: PMC6476468
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
Vaccines, Attenuated
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0213978Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Avian Pathol. 1996 Mar;25(1):35-47
pubmed: 18645835
Avian Dis. 2001 Jan-Mar;45(1):102-21
pubmed: 11332471
Aust Vet J. 1979 Apr;55(4):153-7
pubmed: 223539
Avian Pathol. 2009 Dec;38(6):443-8
pubmed: 19937533
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43422
pubmed: 22912872
Vet Ital. 2011 Apr-Jun;47(2):147-53
pubmed: 21706467
Avian Pathol. 2009 Feb;38(1):31-4
pubmed: 19145513
Poult Sci. 2010 Nov;89(11):2389-95
pubmed: 20952701
Infect Immun. 1979 Oct;26(1):90-8
pubmed: 227800
Virology. 1997 Sep 1;235(2):367-76
pubmed: 9281517
J Virol. 2003 May;77(10):5855-62
pubmed: 12719579
Poult Sci. 2015 Apr;94(4):643-9
pubmed: 25725074
Avian Pathol. 1998;27(1):60-6
pubmed: 18483965
Virology. 2010 Feb 20;397(2):270-6
pubmed: 19962172
Avian Dis. 2000 Oct-Dec;44(4):827-41
pubmed: 11195637
J Vet Med Sci. 2007 Dec;69(12):1295-8
pubmed: 18176029
Avian Dis. 1989 Apr-Jun;33(2):226-35
pubmed: 2546528
Natl Inst Anim Health Q (Tokyo). 1976 Winter;16(4):141-51
pubmed: 189220
Dev Biol (Basel). 2006;126:301-5; discussion 327
pubmed: 17058506