Immune-checkpoint inhibitors and candidate surrogate endpoints for overall survival across tumour types: A systematic literature review.


Journal

Critical reviews in oncology/hematology
ISSN: 1879-0461
Titre abrégé: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8916049

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2019
Historique:
received: 04 12 2018
revised: 26 02 2019
accepted: 27 02 2019
entrez: 25 4 2019
pubmed: 25 4 2019
medline: 22 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Surrogate endpoints (SEs) for overall survival (OS) are specific to therapeutic class. The objective of this review was to document all alternative endpoints studied for their association with OS in Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI)-treated patients. We searched PubMed and Embase for publications reporting the association between a clinical endpoint and OS in ICI-treated populations from 01/01/2003 to 03/31/2018. Out of 6,335 references identified, 24 were selected. Only 3 studies assessed surrogacy at both the patient and trial levels. The main traditional alternative endpoints included progression-free survival (N = 10) and objective response rate (N = 8). New alternative endpoints, such as durable response rate (N = 1) and intermediate response endpoint (N = 1) statistically better correlate with OS in the cancer types analysed. Based on the published evidence, there is insufficient data to support validated SE for OS. Adequate surrogacy assessment of promising composite endpoints which consider a duration component is encouraged.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Surrogate endpoints (SEs) for overall survival (OS) are specific to therapeutic class. The objective of this review was to document all alternative endpoints studied for their association with OS in Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI)-treated patients.
METHODS METHODS
We searched PubMed and Embase for publications reporting the association between a clinical endpoint and OS in ICI-treated populations from 01/01/2003 to 03/31/2018.
RESULTS RESULTS
Out of 6,335 references identified, 24 were selected. Only 3 studies assessed surrogacy at both the patient and trial levels. The main traditional alternative endpoints included progression-free survival (N = 10) and objective response rate (N = 8). New alternative endpoints, such as durable response rate (N = 1) and intermediate response endpoint (N = 1) statistically better correlate with OS in the cancer types analysed.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Based on the published evidence, there is insufficient data to support validated SE for OS. Adequate surrogacy assessment of promising composite endpoints which consider a duration component is encouraged.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31014514
pii: S1040-8428(19)30044-7
doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.02.013
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological 0
B7-H1 Antigen 0
Biomarkers 0
CD274 protein, human 0
CTLA-4 Antigen 0
CTLA4 protein, human 0
PDCD1 protein, human 0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

35-42

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Sébastien Branchoux (S)

Department of Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Rueil-Malmaison, France; Biostatistic Team, Bordeaux Population Health Center, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219, INSERM, Bordeaux, France; Epicene Team (Cancer & Environnement), Bordeaux Population Health Center, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219, INSERM, Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: Sebastien.branchoux@bms.com.

Carine Bellera (C)

Epicene Team (Cancer & Environnement), Bordeaux Population Health Center, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219, INSERM, Bordeaux, France; Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, Institut Bergonié, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, INSERM CIC-EC 14.01, Bordeaux, France.

Antoine Italiano (A)

Department of Early Phase Trial Unit, Institut Bergonié Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux, France.

Denis Rustand (D)

Biostatistic Team, Bordeaux Population Health Center, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219, INSERM, Bordeaux, France.

Anne-Françoise Gaudin (AF)

Department of Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Rueil-Malmaison, France.

Virginie Rondeau (V)

Biostatistic Team, Bordeaux Population Health Center, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219, INSERM, Bordeaux, France; Epicene Team (Cancer & Environnement), Bordeaux Population Health Center, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219, INSERM, Bordeaux, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH