What US hospitals are currently doing to prevent common device-associated infections: results from a national survey.
hospital
infection control
nosocomial infection
patient safety
Journal
BMJ quality & safety
ISSN: 2044-5423
Titre abrégé: BMJ Qual Saf
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101546984
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
received:
19
11
2018
revised:
18
03
2019
accepted:
27
03
2019
pubmed:
25
4
2019
medline:
21
5
2020
entrez:
25
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite focused initiatives to reduce device-associated infection among hospitalised patients, the practices US hospitals are currently using are unknown. We thus used a national survey to ascertain the use of several established and novel practices to prevent device-associated infections. We mailed surveys to infection preventionists in a random sample of nearly 900 US acute care hospitals in 2017. Our survey asked about the use of practices to prevent three common device-associated infections: catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Using sample weights, we estimated the percentage of hospitals reporting regular use of each practice. We also conducted multivariable regression to determine associations between selected hospital characteristics (eg, perceived support from leadership) and use of CAUTI, CLABSI and VAP prevention practices. The response rate was 59%. Several practices are reportedly used in over 90% of US hospitals: aseptic technique during indwelling urethral catheter insertion and maintenance (to prevent CAUTI); maximum sterile barrier precautions during central catheter insertion and alcohol-containing chlorhexidine gluconate for insertion site antisepsis (to prevent CLABSI); and semirecumbent positioning of the patient (to prevent VAP). Antimicrobial devices are used in the minority of hospitals for these three device-associated infections. We provide an updated snapshot of the practices US hospitals are currently using to prevent device-associated infections. Compared with previous studies using a similar design and questions, we found that the use of recommended practices increased in US hospitals, especially for CAUTI prevention.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Despite focused initiatives to reduce device-associated infection among hospitalised patients, the practices US hospitals are currently using are unknown. We thus used a national survey to ascertain the use of several established and novel practices to prevent device-associated infections.
METHODS
We mailed surveys to infection preventionists in a random sample of nearly 900 US acute care hospitals in 2017. Our survey asked about the use of practices to prevent three common device-associated infections: catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Using sample weights, we estimated the percentage of hospitals reporting regular use of each practice. We also conducted multivariable regression to determine associations between selected hospital characteristics (eg, perceived support from leadership) and use of CAUTI, CLABSI and VAP prevention practices.
RESULTS
The response rate was 59%. Several practices are reportedly used in over 90% of US hospitals: aseptic technique during indwelling urethral catheter insertion and maintenance (to prevent CAUTI); maximum sterile barrier precautions during central catheter insertion and alcohol-containing chlorhexidine gluconate for insertion site antisepsis (to prevent CLABSI); and semirecumbent positioning of the patient (to prevent VAP). Antimicrobial devices are used in the minority of hospitals for these three device-associated infections.
CONCLUSIONS
We provide an updated snapshot of the practices US hospitals are currently using to prevent device-associated infections. Compared with previous studies using a similar design and questions, we found that the use of recommended practices increased in US hospitals, especially for CAUTI prevention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31015378
pii: bmjqs-2018-009111
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009111
pmc: PMC6820292
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Pagination
741-749Subventions
Organisme : HSRD VA
ID : RCS 11-222
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: SS reports receiving honoraria for lectures and teaching related to the prevention of hospital-acquired infection and serving on the medical advisory boards for Doximity (a social networking site for physicians) and Jvion (a health care technology company). JM reports receiving honoraria for lectures and teaching related to prevention and value-based policies involving catheter-associated urinary tract infection and hospital-acquired pressure ulcers. SS and JM hold a provisional US patent on a technology to improve aseptic placement of urinary catheters, which was not part of this study.
Références
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;35(7):753-71
pubmed: 24915204
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Dec 1;45(12):1331-1341
pubmed: 28982611
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Dec;36(10):S171.e1-5
pubmed: 19084146
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;35(1):56-62
pubmed: 24334799
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):555-61
pubmed: 21127114
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52(9):1087-99
pubmed: 21467014
Am J Infect Control. 2005 May;33(4):217-26
pubmed: 15877016
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jul;45(7):1208-1215
pubmed: 28448318
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 27;173(10):874-9
pubmed: 23529579
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 May;35(5):464-79
pubmed: 24709715
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;31(4):319-26
pubmed: 20156062
J Hosp Med. 2017 Nov 8;13(2):105-116
pubmed: 29154382
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jan 15;46(2):243-50
pubmed: 18171256
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 25;10:CD008367
pubmed: 27778318
Fed Regist. 2008 Aug 19;73(161):48433-9084
pubmed: 18956499
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 May;35(5):239-46
pubmed: 19480375
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Jun;24(6):385-92
pubmed: 25862757
Infect Dis Clin Pract (Baltim Md). 2015 May;23(3):131-134
pubmed: 25972725
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr 26;13:151
pubmed: 23622427
Am J Med Qual. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):124-9
pubmed: 21918016
N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 21;371(8):691-3
pubmed: 25140953
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 27;173(10):881-6
pubmed: 23529627
Med Care. 2014 Feb;52(2 Suppl 1):S4-8
pubmed: 24430265
JAMA. 2015 Jul 28;314(4):375-83
pubmed: 26219055
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007 Jun;82(6):672-8
pubmed: 17550746
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;35(8):915-36
pubmed: 25026607
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 2;374(22):2111-9
pubmed: 27248619
Am J Infect Control. 2014 Oct;42(10 Suppl):S209-15
pubmed: 25239712