A common gesture with a rare but potentially severe complication: Re-expansion pulmonary edema following chest tube drainage.


Journal

Respiratory medicine case reports
ISSN: 2213-0071
Titre abrégé: Respir Med Case Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101604463

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 19 03 2019
revised: 03 04 2019
accepted: 05 04 2019
entrez: 25 4 2019
pubmed: 25 4 2019
medline: 25 4 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax (PSP) is usually considered as a benign pathology occurring in young people. In about half of cases, observation only is purposed. In case of intervention, chest tube drainage remains the preponderant strategy even if no studies conclude about superiority of drainage or aspiration. Re-expansion pulmonary edema (REPE) is a rare but potentially severe complication of chest tube drainage. Risk factors are not well identified, but REPE is more frequent for patients with diabetes, younger than 40 years, with large pneumothorax, lung collapse more than one week and fast re-expansion. We report a case of a 19-year old male presenting to the Emergency Department with a first episode of PSP. He was treated by chest tube drainage with immediate suction. He developed a REPE 3 hours after chest tube drainage with suction. Conservative management and oxygen therapy led to withdrawing the chest tube 9 days later. For the initial management of PSP, prevention of this complication is essential. In case of risk factors, prevention consist of absence of immediate suction after chest tube drainage and suction should be reserved in case of failure of initial treatment after 24 hours. Even if chest tube drainage is a common gesture, clinical presentation of REPE must alert physicians taking care of these patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax (PSP) is usually considered as a benign pathology occurring in young people. In about half of cases, observation only is purposed. In case of intervention, chest tube drainage remains the preponderant strategy even if no studies conclude about superiority of drainage or aspiration. Re-expansion pulmonary edema (REPE) is a rare but potentially severe complication of chest tube drainage. Risk factors are not well identified, but REPE is more frequent for patients with diabetes, younger than 40 years, with large pneumothorax, lung collapse more than one week and fast re-expansion.
CASE REPORT METHODS
We report a case of a 19-year old male presenting to the Emergency Department with a first episode of PSP. He was treated by chest tube drainage with immediate suction. He developed a REPE 3 hours after chest tube drainage with suction. Conservative management and oxygen therapy led to withdrawing the chest tube 9 days later.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
For the initial management of PSP, prevention of this complication is essential. In case of risk factors, prevention consist of absence of immediate suction after chest tube drainage and suction should be reserved in case of failure of initial treatment after 24 hours. Even if chest tube drainage is a common gesture, clinical presentation of REPE must alert physicians taking care of these patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31016133
doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2019.100838
pii: S2213-0071(19)30096-6
pii: 100838
pmc: PMC6475766
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

100838

Références

J Emerg Med. 2003 Jan;24(1):23-7
pubmed: 12554036
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Oct;30(10):1921-6
pubmed: 15258730
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Aug;14(4):205-9
pubmed: 18818568
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Jul 28;4:40
pubmed: 19638221
Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;27(8):961-7
pubmed: 19857415
Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii18-31
pubmed: 20696690
Arch Med Sci. 2010 Dec;6(6):848-53
pubmed: 22427756
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jul 01;8:164
pubmed: 23816309
J Thorac Dis. 2014 Sep;6(9):1187-92
pubmed: 25276359
Respir Med Case Rep. 2014 Nov 26;14:10-2
pubmed: 26029567
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Mar;13(3):438-43
pubmed: 26963356
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;36(2):327-328
pubmed: 28743478
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 07;9:CD004479
pubmed: 28881006
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 11;19(1):4
pubmed: 30634911

Auteurs

S Kepka (S)

Emergency Department, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

L Lemaitre (L)

Emergency Department, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

T Marx (T)

Emergency Department, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.

P Bilbault (P)

Emergency Department, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
INSERM UMR 1260, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

T Desmettre (T)

Emergency Department, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.

Classifications MeSH