Multimodal OCT Reflectivity Analysis of the Cystoid Spaces in Cystoid Macular Edema.
Aged
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diabetic Retinopathy
/ physiopathology
Female
Fluorescein Angiography
/ methods
France
Humans
Italy
Macular Edema
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Multimodal Imaging
/ methods
Retinal Vein Occlusion
/ diagnostic imaging
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, Optical Coherence
/ methods
Visual Acuity
/ physiology
Journal
BioMed research international
ISSN: 2314-6141
Titre abrégé: Biomed Res Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101600173
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
01
04
2018
revised:
12
07
2018
accepted:
30
12
2018
entrez:
25
4
2019
pubmed:
25
4
2019
medline:
17
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To compare and evaluate images of macular cysts with different degrees of reflectivity (from gray to black signal) as observed in B scan spectral domain OCT (SDOCT) and EnFace OCT with decorrelation signal obtained with OCT-angiography (OCTA) in eyes with cystoid macular edema (CME) secondary to diabetic retinopathy (DR) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Images from 3033 patients affected by CME secondary to diabetes or RVO examined OCTA (Optovue XR Avanti, Optovue, USA) at the University Eye Clinic of Créteil, Hôpital Intercommunal, France, and at the University Eye Clinic of Cagliari, "San Giovanni di Dio" Hospital, Italy, were retrospectively examined. The deep capillary plexus OCTA images and the corresponding EnFace OCT images, both acquired with the same automatic segmentation, had been overlapped to compose RGB color images as red and green channels, respectively, using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Afterward, linear regions of interest were traced on the color images to obtain the profiles of OCTA and EnFace gray values. Number of pixels, mean gray value and standard deviation of the area traced in OCT-A, and EnFace image were analyzed and statistically correlated. Data were exported to Excel to create the plots. 94 patients with DME and 27 patients with RVO showed intraretinal macular cystoid spaces with similar homogeneous, gray-looking content; 73 patients with DME and 113 patients with RVO showed macular cystoid spaces with homogeneous, black-looking content, as observed at SD-OCT, EnFace and OCTA scans. Interestingly, the limits of macular cystoid spaces were clearly detectable with OCTA. The analysis of red and green profiles demonstrated a clearly visible overlap between average OCTA and EnFace signal observed around cystoid spaces that could be attributed to a relationship between the dynamic vascularization and the structural density of the tissue. This is the first investigation that characterizes and correlates OCTA and EnFace signals on images of macular cystoid spaces in DR and RVO. The low intensity OCTA signals observed inside cystoid spaces raise a relevant question about their nature, as to whether they are due to the presence of corpusculated material pouring out from bloodocular-barrier or they should be considered OCTA artifacts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31016197
doi: 10.1155/2019/7835372
pmc: PMC6446091
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
7835372Références
Ophthalmology. 2012 May;119(5):1047-55
pubmed: 22330965
Ophthalmology. 2012 May;119(5):1056-65
pubmed: 22342014
Retina. 2012 Jun;32(6):1087-99
pubmed: 22481473
Int Ophthalmol. 2012 Aug;32(4):369-77
pubmed: 22562161
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
J Diabetes Res. 2013;2013:920713
pubmed: 24073417
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan-Feb;24(1):1-9
pubmed: 24249150
Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:434560
pubmed: 24369444
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;98 Suppl 2:ii24-9
pubmed: 24934220
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:191847
pubmed: 24963500
Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2013 Summer;7(3):255-8
pubmed: 25391118
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;160(1):35-44.e1
pubmed: 25896459
Retina. 2015 Nov;35(11):2196-203
pubmed: 25932558
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015 Sep;48:119-36
pubmed: 26014685
Retina. 2015 Nov;35(11):2371-6
pubmed: 26308529
Retina. 2015 Nov;35(11):2163-80
pubmed: 26428607
Retina. 2015 Nov;35(11):2364-70
pubmed: 26469537
J Biomed Opt. 2015 Oct;20(10):100901
pubmed: 26473588
Retina. 2015 Nov;35(11):2161-2
pubmed: 26502006
Retina. 2015 Nov;35(11):2332-8
pubmed: 26502008
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct;100(10):1332-6
pubmed: 26719492
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0149246
pubmed: 26885822
Dev Ophthalmol. 2016;56:37-44
pubmed: 27023473
Dev Ophthalmol. 2016;56:52-6
pubmed: 27023798
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug 4;26(5):460-8
pubmed: 27405288
Retina. 2016 Dec;36 Suppl 1:S102-S110
pubmed: 28005668
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 May;177:116-125
pubmed: 28237411
Dev Ophthalmol. 2017;58:63-73
pubmed: 28351045
Dev Ophthalmol. 2017;58:178-190
pubmed: 28351047
Dev Ophthalmol. 2017;58:168-177
pubmed: 28351051
Dev Ophthalmol. 2017;60:16-27
pubmed: 28427061
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 Sep;36(9):1773-1783
pubmed: 28475051
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul;255(7):1459-1460
pubmed: 28484833
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2017 Sep;60:66-100
pubmed: 28760677
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018 May;64:1-55
pubmed: 29229445
Surv Ophthalmol. 1984 May;28 Suppl:471-84
pubmed: 6463848