Effectiveness of a multimodal intervention in functionally impaired older people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes
Frailty
Functional status
Multimodal intervention
Older people
Pre-frail
Randomized controlled trial
Journal
Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle
ISSN: 2190-6009
Titre abrégé: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101552883
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
09
01
2019
accepted:
21
03
2019
pubmed:
25
4
2019
medline:
21
7
2020
entrez:
25
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Type 2 diabetes, a highly prevalent chronic disease, is associated with increasing frailty and functional decline in older people. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodal intervention on functional performance in frail and pre-frail participants aged ≥70 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The MID-Frail study was a cluster-randomized multicenter clinical trial conducted in 74 trial sites across seven European countries. The trial recruited 964 participants who were aged >70 years [mean age in intervention group, 78.4 (SD 5.6) years, 49.2% male and 77.6 (SD 5.29) years, 52.4% male in usual care group], with type diabetes mellitus and determined to be frail or pre-frail using Fried's frailty phenotype. Participants were allocated by trial site to follow either usual care (UCG) or intervention procedures (IG). Intervention group participants received a multimodal intervention composed of (i) an individualized and progressive resistance exercise programme for 16 weeks; (ii) a structured diabetes and nutritional educational programme over seven sessions; and (iii) Investigator-linked training to ensure optimal diabetes care. Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scores were used to assess change in functional performance at 12 months between the groups. An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the intervention was undertaken using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Secondary outcomes included mortality, hospitalization, institutionalization, quality of life, burden on caregivers, the frequency and severity of hypoglycaemia episodes, and the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. After 12 months, IG participants had mean SPPB scores 0.85 points higher than those in the UCG (95% CI, 0.44 to 1.26, P < 0.0001). Dropouts were higher in frail participants and in the intervention group, but significant differences in SPPB between treatment groups remained consistent after sensitivity analysis. Estimates suggest a mean saving following intervention of 428.02 EUR (2016) per patient per year, with ICER analysis indicating a consistent benefit of the described health care intervention over usual care. No statistically significant differences between groups were detected in any of the other secondary outcomes. We have demonstrated that a 12 month structured multimodal intervention programme across several clinical settings in different European countries leads to a clinically relevant and cost-effective improvement in the functional status of older frail and pre-frail participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Type 2 diabetes, a highly prevalent chronic disease, is associated with increasing frailty and functional decline in older people. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodal intervention on functional performance in frail and pre-frail participants aged ≥70 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
METHODS
The MID-Frail study was a cluster-randomized multicenter clinical trial conducted in 74 trial sites across seven European countries. The trial recruited 964 participants who were aged >70 years [mean age in intervention group, 78.4 (SD 5.6) years, 49.2% male and 77.6 (SD 5.29) years, 52.4% male in usual care group], with type diabetes mellitus and determined to be frail or pre-frail using Fried's frailty phenotype. Participants were allocated by trial site to follow either usual care (UCG) or intervention procedures (IG). Intervention group participants received a multimodal intervention composed of (i) an individualized and progressive resistance exercise programme for 16 weeks; (ii) a structured diabetes and nutritional educational programme over seven sessions; and (iii) Investigator-linked training to ensure optimal diabetes care. Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scores were used to assess change in functional performance at 12 months between the groups. An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the intervention was undertaken using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Secondary outcomes included mortality, hospitalization, institutionalization, quality of life, burden on caregivers, the frequency and severity of hypoglycaemia episodes, and the cost-effectiveness of the intervention.
RESULTS
After 12 months, IG participants had mean SPPB scores 0.85 points higher than those in the UCG (95% CI, 0.44 to 1.26, P < 0.0001). Dropouts were higher in frail participants and in the intervention group, but significant differences in SPPB between treatment groups remained consistent after sensitivity analysis. Estimates suggest a mean saving following intervention of 428.02 EUR (2016) per patient per year, with ICER analysis indicating a consistent benefit of the described health care intervention over usual care. No statistically significant differences between groups were detected in any of the other secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
We have demonstrated that a 12 month structured multimodal intervention programme across several clinical settings in different European countries leads to a clinically relevant and cost-effective improvement in the functional status of older frail and pre-frail participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31016897
doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12432
pmc: PMC6711410
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
721-733Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders.
Références
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5
pubmed: 14258950
Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Jul 28;6:192
pubmed: 25120482
Age Ageing. 2014 Sep;43(5):687-95
pubmed: 24742587
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Apr 17;73(5):688-694
pubmed: 29490012
Diabetes Care. 2005 Mar;28(3):662-7
pubmed: 15735205
Qual Life Res. 2013 Sep;22(7):1717-27
pubmed: 23184421
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017 Dec;8(6):1081-1083
pubmed: 29098794
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Jan;16(1):41-8
pubmed: 25239014
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012 Nov;67(11):1259-65
pubmed: 22496538
Diabetes Care. 2012 Aug;35(8):1672-9
pubmed: 22596176
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Apr;3(4):275-85
pubmed: 25466523
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Apr;60(4):652-60
pubmed: 22316162
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Jul;3(7):e323-e332
pubmed: 29908859
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016 Apr 29;4(1):e000202
pubmed: 27158520
BMJ. 2003 Oct 4;327(7418):785-9
pubmed: 14525877
J Diabetes Complications. 2017 Sep;31(9):1465-1473
pubmed: 28669464
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006 Jun;61(6):594-9
pubmed: 16799142
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013 Oct;1(2):106-14
pubmed: 24622316
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1603-1658
pubmed: 27733283
Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86
pubmed: 5349366
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Oct 1;17(10):949-55
pubmed: 27600194
J Nutr Health Aging. 2009 Jun;13(6):538-44
pubmed: 19536422
Lancet. 2013 Oct 26;382(9902):1386-7
pubmed: 23948126
Diabetes Metab. 2011 Nov;37 Suppl 3:S27-38
pubmed: 22183418
Lancet. 2018 Jun 16;391(10138):2430-2440
pubmed: 29784146
Age (Dordr). 2015 Jun;37(3):64
pubmed: 26054595
Am J Nurs. 2008 Sep;108(9):62-9; quiz 69-70
pubmed: 18756161
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56
pubmed: 11253156
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Mar 6;168(5):309-316
pubmed: 29310138
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006 Jun;61(6):589-93
pubmed: 16799141
Rejuvenation Res. 2013 Apr;16(2):105-14
pubmed: 23327448
J Physiother. 2017 Jan;63(1):40-44
pubmed: 27993489
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015 Feb;70(2):216-22
pubmed: 25387728
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019 Aug;10(4):721-733
pubmed: 31016897
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016 Sep;7(4):422-35
pubmed: 27239405
J Aging Res. 2011 Apr 04;2011:569194
pubmed: 21584244
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;126:60-67
pubmed: 28214668
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Dec 15;309(12):E949-59
pubmed: 26487009
Trials. 2014 Jan 24;15:34
pubmed: 24456998
N Engl J Med. 1995 Mar 2;332(9):556-61
pubmed: 7838189
JAMA. 2014 Jun 18;311(23):2387-96
pubmed: 24866862