Estimation of the Required Lipoprotein(a)-Lowering Therapeutic Effect Size for Reduction in Coronary Heart Disease Outcomes: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis.


Journal

JAMA cardiology
ISSN: 2380-6591
Titre abrégé: JAMA Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101676033

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 06 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 25 4 2019
medline: 18 6 2020
entrez: 25 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Genetic and epidemiologic data suggest that lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is one of the strongest genetically determined risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). Specific therapies to lower Lp(a) are on the horizon, but the required reduction of Lp(a) to translate into clinically relevant lowering of CHD outcomes is a matter of debate. To estimate the required Lp(a)-lowering effect size that may be associated with a reduction of CHD outcomes compared with the effect size of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapies. Genetic epidemiologic study using a mendelian randomization analysis to estimate the required Lp(a)-lowering effect size for a clinically meaningful effect on outcomes. We used the effect estimates for Lp(a) from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) and meta-analysis on Lp(a) published in 2017 of 5 different primarily population-based studies of European ancestry. All Lp(a) measurements were performed in 1 laboratory. Genetic estimates for 27 single-nucleotide polymorphisms on Lp(a) concentrations were used. Odds ratios for these 27 single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with CHD risk were retrieved from a subsample of the CHD Exome+ consortium. Genetic LPA score, plasma Lp(a) concentrations, and observations of statin therapies on CHD outcomes. Coronary heart disease. The study included 13 781 individuals from the Lp(a)-GWAS-Consortium from 5 primarily population-based studies and 20 793 CHD cases and 27 540 controls from a subsample of the CHD Exome+ consortium. Four of the studies were similar in age distribution (means between 51 and 59 years), and 1 cohort was younger; mean age, 32 years. The frequency of women was similar between 51% and 55%. We estimated that the required reduction in Lp(a) effect size would be 65.7 mg/dL (95% CI, 46.3-88.3) to reach the same potential effect on clinical outcomes that can be reached by lowering LDL-C by 38.67 mg/dL (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259). This mendelian randomization analysis estimated a required Lp(a)-lowering effect size of 65.7 mg/dL to reach the same effect as a 38.67-mg/dL lowering of LDL-C. However, this estimate is determined by the observed effect estimates of single-nucleotide polymorphisms on Lp(a) concentrations and is therefore influenced by the standardization of the Lp(a) assay used. As a consequence, calculations of the required Lp(a)-lowering potential of a drug to be clinically effective might have been overestimated in the past.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31017618
pii: 2731739
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1041
pmc: PMC6487909
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cholesterol, LDL 0
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors 0
Lipoprotein(a) 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

575-579

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Références

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 May 11;55(19):2160-7
pubmed: 20447543
J Intern Med. 2013 Jan;273(1):6-30
pubmed: 22998429
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):619-627
pubmed: 29926099
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2018 Feb;11(2):e001696
pubmed: 29449329
Circulation. 2019 Mar 19;139(12):1483-1492
pubmed: 30586750
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 1;46(6):1734-1739
pubmed: 28398548
Arterioscler Thromb. 1992 Oct;12(10):1214-26
pubmed: 1390593
Stat Med. 2016 May 20;35(11):1880-906
pubmed: 26661904
Kidney Int. 2004 Feb;65(2):606-12
pubmed: 14717931
Lancet. 2010 Nov 13;376(9753):1670-81
pubmed: 21067804
Circulation. 2018 Oct 23;138(17):1839-1849
pubmed: 29703846
Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2239-2253
pubmed: 27665230
JAMA. 2009 Jun 10;301(22):2331-9
pubmed: 19509380
Eur Heart J. 2017 Aug 21;38(32):2490-2498
pubmed: 28449027
N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 24;361(26):2518-28
pubmed: 20032323
J Lipid Res. 2017 Sep;58(9):1834-1844
pubmed: 28512139

Auteurs

Claudia Lamina (C)

Division of Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Medical Genetics, Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Florian Kronenberg (F)

Division of Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Medical Genetics, Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH