The use of high-dose intrathecal diamorphine in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.
Intrathecal
bariatric
bariatric surgery
diamorphine
neuroaxial
Journal
British journal of pain
ISSN: 2049-4637
Titre abrégé: Br J Pain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101583844
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
entrez:
26
4
2019
pubmed:
26
4
2019
medline:
26
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The use of intrathecal diamorphine is not commonplace in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. At our institution, a major UK bariatric centre, high-dose intrathecal diamorphine is routinely utilised. Data were analysed retrospectively. Fifty-three patients who had a spinal anaesthetic were matched against age, sex, body mass index and surgical procedure type to generate controls. Pain scores were recorded in the post-anaesthetic care unit on arrival, after 1 hour and on discharge to the ward. Post-operative nausea and vomiting; post-operative hypertension; pruritus; 24-hour morphine consumption and length of stay were measured. Pain scores were better in the spinal anaesthetic group in all measured categories (p = 0.033, p < 0.01, p < 0.01); post-operative nausea and vomiting was less common in the spinal anaesthetic group (p < 0.01); post-operative hypertension was less common in the spinal anaesthetic group (p = 0.25); pruritus was more common in the spinal anaesthetic group (p < 0.01); morphine consumption was less common in the spinal anaesthetic group (p = 0.037). Length of hospital stay was reduced by 12.4 hours (p = 0.025). We propose that this is a practical and safe technique to adopt. A randomised-control trial will need to be conducted in order to find the most efficacious volume of local anaesthetic and dose of diamorphine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31019692
doi: 10.1177/2049463718800521
pii: 10.1177_2049463718800521
pmc: PMC6463352
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
106-111Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Références
Anaesthesia. 2001 Jan;56(1):54-60
pubmed: 11167437
Can J Anaesth. 2003 Apr;50(4):336-41
pubmed: 12670809
Br J Anaesth. 2003 Sep;91(3):368-72
pubmed: 12925476
Can J Anaesth. 2005 Feb;52(2):176-80
pubmed: 15684259
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2004 Feb;17(1):21-30
pubmed: 17021525
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Jul;52(7):1239-43
pubmed: 19571699
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Mar;25(1):73-81
pubmed: 21516915
Br J Surg. 2011 Aug;98(8):1068-78
pubmed: 21590762
Obes Surg. 2013 Aug;23(8):1309-14
pubmed: 23591549
Br J Anaesth. 2014 May;112(5):906-11
pubmed: 24554545
Anaesthesia. 2016 Jan;71(1):85-93
pubmed: 26582586
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989 Sep;71(5):289-92
pubmed: 2679331
Br J Pain. 2016 Nov;10(4):209-216
pubmed: 27867510
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):372-376
pubmed: 28272292
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2017 Oct;64(8):427-430
pubmed: 28431750