Prevalence of human T-lymphotropic virus 1/2 in Nigeria's capital territory and meta-analysis of Nigerian studies.
HTLV
blood donors
haematologic malignancies
leukaemia
lymphoma
lymphoproliferative disorders
Journal
SAGE open medicine
ISSN: 2050-3121
Titre abrégé: SAGE Open Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101624744
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
10
08
2018
accepted:
22
03
2019
entrez:
26
4
2019
pubmed:
26
4
2019
medline:
26
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study was aimed at determining human T-lymphotropic virus 1/2 prevalence among apparently healthy, immunocompromised and haematologic malignant individuals in Nigeria's capital, as well as meta-analysis of all Nigerian studies until date. A total of 200 participants were recruited into a cross-sectional study. In total, 1 mL each of sera and plasma were obtained from 5 mL blood of each participant and analysed for antibodies to human T-lymphotropic virus 1/2 using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; positive samples confirmed with qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, followed by statistical and meta-analysis. Sociodemographic characteristics and possible risk factors were assessed via questionnaires. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay yielded 1% prevalence which was confirmed to be zero via polymerase chain reaction. A total of 119 (59.5%) of the participants were male, while the mean age was 35.28 ± 13.61 years. Apart from sex and blood reception/donation, there was generally a low rate of exposure to human T-lymphotropic virus-associated risk factors. Meta-analysis revealed pooled prevalence of human T-lymphotropic virus 1 and 2 to be 3% and 0%, respectively, from Nigerian studies. This study discovered zero prevalence of human T-lymphotropic virus 1/2 from five major hospitals in Nigeria's capital, exposing the importance of confirmatory assays after positive antibody detection assay results. Meta-analysis highlighted the existence of very few reliable Nigerian studies compared to the demography of the nation. Large-scale epidemiological studies and routine screening of risk populations are therefore needed since Nigeria lies in the region of endemicity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31019698
doi: 10.1177/2050312119843706
pii: 10.1177_2050312119843706
pmc: PMC6469272
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2050312119843706Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Nature. 1992 Sep 17;359(6392):201
pubmed: 1528262
Scand J Infect Dis. 1990;22(2):155-60
pubmed: 1972590
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2010 Mar-Apr;43(2):111-5
pubmed: 20464136
Virus Res. 2012 Jan;163(1):87-90
pubmed: 21924305
Front Microbiol. 2012 Nov 15;3:388
pubmed: 23162541
J Blood Med. 2014 Sep 05;5:169-74
pubmed: 25228827
Int J Womens Health. 2014 Sep 18;6:849-55
pubmed: 25258559
Pan Afr Med J. 2014 Apr 21;17:301
pubmed: 25328597
J Blood Med. 2015 Jan 19;6:31-6
pubmed: 25632240
Virology (Auckl). 2015 Dec 14;6:17-23
pubmed: 26688662
Braz J Infect Dis. 2018 May - Jun;22(3):224-234
pubmed: 29879426
Bull Acad Natl Med. 1988 May;172(5):717-22
pubmed: 3056585
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 May 19;288(6429):1495-6
pubmed: 6326929
Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Feb;24(1):198-203
pubmed: 7797344
Br J Cancer. 1993 Apr;67(4):783-6
pubmed: 8471436
Arch Virol. 1996;141(2):345-55
pubmed: 8634025
Trop Med Int Health. 1996 Apr;1(2):205-9
pubmed: 8665385