Technical feasibility of EUS-guided antegrade dilation for hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic stricture using novel endoscopic device (with videos).
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anastomosis, Surgical
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde
/ methods
Device Removal
Dilatation
/ instrumentation
Duodenum
/ surgery
Endosonography
/ methods
Feasibility Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Jejunum
/ surgery
Liver
/ surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Pilot Projects
Retrospective Studies
Stents
/ adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
ERCP
EUS
EUS-guided biliary drainage
EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy
Journal
United European gastroenterology journal
ISSN: 2050-6406
Titre abrégé: United European Gastroenterol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101606807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
24
10
2018
accepted:
12
12
2018
entrez:
26
4
2019
pubmed:
26
4
2019
medline:
26
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A novel endoscopic dilation device (EZ Dilator; Zeon Medical Co, Tokyo, Japan) is now available in Japan that might affect dilation for biliary strictures under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance because it has good push ability. We evaluated the technical feasibility of this device under EUS guidance in a case series of patients with hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic stricture (HJAS) that led to further complications. We enrolled 14 patients with HJAS leading to obstructive jaundice or repeated cholangitis in this study. Technical success was defined as insertion of the EZ Dilator into the intestine across the stricture site without the need for other dilation devices. Deployed plastic stents were removed after three months to evaluate anastomosis sites. The median procedural duration was 25 minutes. Rates of technical and clinical success were 100% and 78.5%, respectively. One patient developed an adverse event of abdominal pain. Contrast medium flowed across the anastomosis site in 11 patients after stent removal, indicating a clinical success rate of 78.5% (11 of 14). Plastic stents were deployed again in the remaining three patients. Although a prospective evaluation with long-term follow up is needed, the EZ Dilator shows clinical promise for treating benign biliary strictures under ERCP and EUS guidance.
Sections du résumé
Background
A novel endoscopic dilation device (EZ Dilator; Zeon Medical Co, Tokyo, Japan) is now available in Japan that might affect dilation for biliary strictures under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance because it has good push ability. We evaluated the technical feasibility of this device under EUS guidance in a case series of patients with hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic stricture (HJAS) that led to further complications.
Method
We enrolled 14 patients with HJAS leading to obstructive jaundice or repeated cholangitis in this study. Technical success was defined as insertion of the EZ Dilator into the intestine across the stricture site without the need for other dilation devices. Deployed plastic stents were removed after three months to evaluate anastomosis sites.
Results
The median procedural duration was 25 minutes. Rates of technical and clinical success were 100% and 78.5%, respectively. One patient developed an adverse event of abdominal pain. Contrast medium flowed across the anastomosis site in 11 patients after stent removal, indicating a clinical success rate of 78.5% (11 of 14). Plastic stents were deployed again in the remaining three patients.
Conclusion
Although a prospective evaluation with long-term follow up is needed, the EZ Dilator shows clinical promise for treating benign biliary strictures under ERCP and EUS guidance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31019711
doi: 10.1177/2050640618823662
pii: 10.1177_2050640618823662
pmc: PMC6466748
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
419-423Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2018 Apr;28(2):171-185
pubmed: 29519330
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Feb;83(2):377-86.e6
pubmed: 26234697
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):14
pubmed: 29347923
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):446-54
pubmed: 20189503
Endoscopy. 2009 Oct;41(10):849-54
pubmed: 19750447
Endoscopy. 2014 Jul;46(7):560-72
pubmed: 24839188
Ann Surg. 2006 May;243(5):571-6; discussion 576-8
pubmed: 16632990
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016 Oct;23(10):E25-E29
pubmed: 27531563
Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Mar;58(3):858-64
pubmed: 22975796
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jan;105(1):93-9
pubmed: 19809409
Arch Surg. 2001 Apr;136(4):391-8
pubmed: 11296108
Endosc Ultrasound. 2018 Jan-Feb;7(1):4-9
pubmed: 29451164
J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Dec;11(12):1704-11
pubmed: 17929105
Gut. 2018 Jul;67(7):1209-1228
pubmed: 29463614