Single-Fraction Stereotactic vs Conventional Multifraction Radiotherapy for Pain Relief in Patients With Predominantly Nonspine Bone Metastases: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial.
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2019
01 06 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
26
4
2019
medline:
11
2
2020
entrez:
26
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Consensus is lacking as to the optimal radiotherapy dose and fractionation schedule for treating bone metastases. To assess the relative efficacy of high-dose, single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) vs standard multifraction radiotherapy (MFRT) for alleviation of pain in patients with mostly nonspine bone metastases. This prospective, randomized, single-institution phase 2 noninferiority trial conducted at a tertiary cancer care center enrolled 160 patients with radiologically confirmed painful bone metastases from September 19, 2014, through June 19, 2018. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either single-fraction SBRT (12 Gy for ≥4-cm lesions or 16 Gy for <4-cm lesions) or MFRT to 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The primary end point was pain response, defined by international consensus criteria as a combination of pain score and analgesic use (daily morphine-equivalent dose). Pain failure (ie, lack of response) was defined as worsening pain score (≥2 points on a 0-to-10 scale), an increase in morphine-equivalent opioid dose of 50% or more, reirradiation, or pathologic fracture. We hypothesized that SBRT was noninferior to MFRT. In this phase 2 noninferiority trial of 96 men and 64 women (mean [SD] age, 62.4 [10.4] years), 81 patients received SBRT and 79 received MFRT. Among evaluable patients who received treatment per protocol, the single-fraction group had more pain responders than the MFRT group (complete response + partial response) at 2 weeks (34 of 55 [62%] vs 19 of 52 [36%]) (P = .01), 3 months (31 of 43 [72%] vs 17 of 35 [49%]) (P = .03), and 9 months (17 of 22 [77%] vs 12 of 26 [46%]) (P = .03). No differences were found in treatment-related toxic effects or quality-of-life scores after SBRT vs MFRT; local control rates at 1 and 2 years were higher in patients receiving single-fraction SBRT. Delivering high-dose, single-fraction SBRT seems to be an effective treatment option for patients with painful bone metastases. Among evaluable patients, SBRT had higher rates of pain response (complete response + partial response) than did MFRT and thus should be considered for patients expected to have relatively long survival. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02163226.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31021390
pii: 2731142
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0192
pmc: PMC6487911
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02163226']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
872-878Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016672
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Radiother Oncol. 2018 May;127(2):304-309
pubmed: 29706460
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 May;133(5):471-6
pubmed: 17520761
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr 10;25(11):1423-36
pubmed: 17416863
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016 Mar;125:79-87
pubmed: 26652976
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2003 Sep;15(6):345-52
pubmed: 14524489
Ann Palliat Med. 2016 Jan;5(1):58-66
pubmed: 26841816
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):1730-7
pubmed: 21489705
Head Neck. 2007 Mar;29(3):221-9
pubmed: 17163462
Radiother Oncol. 2009 May;91(2):261-6
pubmed: 19307034
Radiother Oncol. 2006 Jun;79(3):278-84
pubmed: 16793154
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Jul;124(1):38-44
pubmed: 28629871
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Mar 1;55(3):594-605
pubmed: 12573746
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):e117-20
pubmed: 22381902
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 1;26(16):2754-60
pubmed: 18509185
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 1;23(28):7199-206
pubmed: 16192604
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2015 May;27(5):298-306
pubmed: 25687175
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012 Mar;24(2):112-24
pubmed: 22130630
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804
pubmed: 15928300
Radiother Oncol. 2002 Sep;64(3):275-80
pubmed: 12242115
Cancer. 2000 Oct 1;89(7):1634-46
pubmed: 11013380
Radiother Oncol. 1999 Aug;52(2):101-9
pubmed: 10577695
Control Clin Trials. 1994 Apr;15(2):135-53
pubmed: 8205804
J Bone Oncol. 2014 Nov 07;3(3-4):96-102
pubmed: 26909305
Radiother Oncol. 1999 Aug;52(2):111-21
pubmed: 10577696