Measuring the depth of invasion in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: interobserver agreement and pitfalls.
depth of invasion
interobserver agreement
vulvar neoplasm
vulvar squamous cell carcinoma
Journal
Histopathology
ISSN: 1365-2559
Titre abrégé: Histopathology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7704136
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
28
02
2019
accepted:
22
04
2019
pubmed:
26
4
2019
medline:
23
2
2020
entrez:
26
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The depth of invasion is an important prognostic factor for patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The threshold of 1 mm distinguishes between FIGO stages IA and ≥IB disease and guides the need for groin surgery. Therefore, high interobserver agreement is crucial. The conventional and the alternative method are described to measure the depth of invasion. The aims of this study were to assess interobserver agreement for classifying the depth of invasion using both methods and to identify pitfalls. Fifty slides of vulvar SCC with a depth of invasion approximately 1 mm were selected, digitally scanned and independently assessed by 10 pathologists working in a referral or oncology centre and four pathologists in training. The depth of invasion was measured using both the conventional and alternative method in each slide and categorised into ≤1 and >1 mm. The percentage of agreement and Light's kappa for multi-rater agreement were calculated, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by bootstrapping (1000 runs). The agreement using the conventional method was moderate (κ = 0.57, 95% confidence interval = 0.45-0.68). The percentage of agreement among the participating pathologists using the conventional method was 85.0% versus 89.4% using the alternative method. Six pitfalls were identified: disagreement concerning which invasive nest is deepest, recognition of invasive growth and where it starts, curved surface, carcinoma situated on the edge of the tissue block, ulceration and different measurement methods. Pathologists reached only moderate agreement in determining the depth of invasion in vulvar SCC, without a notable difference between the two measurement methods.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31021414
doi: 10.1111/his.13883
pmc: PMC6851854
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
413-420Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Histopathology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Mar;28(1):188-95
pubmed: 3987129
Head Neck. 2005 Dec;27(12):1080-91
pubmed: 16240329
Am J Surg Pathol. 2013 Sep;37(9):1336-41
pubmed: 24076774
Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Jan;76(1):24-7
pubmed: 10620436
Mod Pathol. 2015 Feb;28(2):295-302
pubmed: 25189641
Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Jan;61(1):63-74
pubmed: 6823350
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003 Jul-Aug;13(4):522-7
pubmed: 12911732
Fam Med. 2005 May;37(5):360-3
pubmed: 15883903
Stat Med. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):3972-81
pubmed: 22764084
Histopathology. 2019 Sep;75(3):413-420
pubmed: 31021414
Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 May;32(5):765-72
pubmed: 18379417
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 May;125(2):97-8
pubmed: 24630859
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 May;27(4):832-837
pubmed: 28441255
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Sep;146(3):580-587
pubmed: 28687171
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004 Sep-Oct;14(5):741-50
pubmed: 15361180
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jul;15(7):788-97
pubmed: 23331927