Effect of Concurrent Power Training and High-Intensity Interval Cycling on Muscle Morphology and Performance.
Journal
Journal of strength and conditioning research
ISSN: 1533-4287
Titre abrégé: J Strength Cond Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9415084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2021
01 Sep 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
26
4
2019
medline:
27
8
2021
entrez:
26
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Spiliopoulou, P, Zaras, N, Methenitis, S, Papadimas, G, Papadopoulos, C, Bogdanis, GC, and Terzis, G. Effect of concurrent power training and high-intensity interval cycling on muscle morphology and performance. J Strength Cond Res 35(9): 2464-2471, 2021-The aim of the study was to examine the effect of performing high-intensity interval cycling on muscle morphology and performance immediately after power training (PT). Twenty healthy female physical education students were assigned into 2 training groups. One group performed PT, and the other group performed the same PT followed by high-intensity interval aerobic training on a cycle ergometer (PTC). Training was performed 3 days per week for 6 weeks. Countermovement jump (CMJ) height and CMJ power, half-squat maximal strength (1 repetition maximum), maximum aerobic power, vastus lateralis muscle fiber composition, and cross-sectional area (CSA) were evaluated before and after the intervention. Countermovement jump height increased after PT (10.1 ± 6.6%, p = 0.002) but not after PTC (-5.1 ± 10.5%, p = 0.099), with significant difference between groups (p = 0.001). Countermovement jump power increased after PT (4.5 ± 4.9%, p = 0.021) but not after PTC (-2.4 ± 6.4, p = 0.278), with significant difference between groups (p = 0.017). One repetition maximum increased similarly in both groups. Muscle fiber composition was not altered after either PT or PTC. Vastus lateralis muscle fiber CSA increased significantly and similarly after both PT (I: 16.9 ± 16.2%, p = 0.035, ΙΙΑ: 12.7 ± 10.9%, p = 0.008,ΙΙΧ: 15.5 ± 17.1%, p = 0.021) and PTC (Ι: 18.0 ± 23.7%, p = 0.033,ΙΙΑ: 18.2 ± 11.4%, p = 0.001,ΙΙΧ: 25.5 ± 19.6%, p = 0.003). These results suggest that the addition of high-intensity interval cycling to PT inhibits the anticipated increase in jumping performance induced by PT per se. This inhibition is not explained by changes in muscle fiber type composition or vastus lateralis muscle fiber CSA adaptations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31022104
pii: 00124278-202109000-00016
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003172
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2464-2471Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
Références
Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, Magnusson P, Dyhre-Poulsen P. Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl Physiol 93: 1318–1326, 2002.
American College of Sports Medicine. Laboratory submaximal exercise testing: YMCA cycle ergometer test. In: ACSM's Health-Related Physical Fitness Assessment Manual (2nd ed.). Dwyer GB, Davis SE, eds. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer, 2008. pp. 112–116.
Andersen JL, Aagaard P. Effects of strength training on muscle fiber types and size; consequences for athletes training for high-intensity sport. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2: 32–38, 2010.
Baechle TR, Earle RW, Wathen D. Resistance training. In: Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. Baechle TR, Earle RW, eds. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2000. pp. 395–425.
Blazevich AJ. Effects of physical training and detraining, immobilisation, growth and aging on human fascicle geometry. Sports Med 36: 1003–1017, 2006.
Bogdanis GC, Tsoukos A, Brown LE, et al. Muscle fiber and performance changes after fast eccentric complex training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 50: 729–738, 2018.
Bosco C, Luhtanen P, Komi PV. A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 50: 273–282, 1983.
Brooke MH, Kaiser KK. Muscle fiber types: How many and what kind? Arch Neurol 23: 369–379, 1970.
Brooke MH, Kaiser KK. Three “myosin adenosine triphosphatase” systems: The nature of their pH lability and sulfhydryl dependence. J Histochem Cytochem 18: 670–672, 1970.
Coffey VG, Hawley JA. Concurrent exercise training: Do opposites distract? J Physiol 595: 2883–2896, 2017.
Cormie P, McGuigan MR, Newton RU. Developing maximal neuromuscular power: Part 1—Biological basis of maximal power production. Sports Med 41: 17–38, 2011.
Fyfe JJ, Bartlett JD, Hanson ED, Stepto NK, Bishop DJ. Endurance training intensity does not mediate interference to maximal lower-body strength gain during short-term concurrent training. Front Physiol 7: 487, 2016.
Fyfe JJ, Bishop DJ, Bartlett JD, et al. Enhanced skeletal muscle ribosome biogenesis, yet attenuated mTORC1 and ribosome biogenesis-related signalling, following short-term concurrent versus single-mode resistance training. Sci Rep 8: 560, 2018.
Häkkinen K, Alen M, Kraemer WJ, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations during concurrent strength and endurance training versus strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol 89: 42–52, 2003.
Hennessy LC, Watson AW. The interference effects of training for strength and endurance simultaneously. J Strength Cond Res 8: 12–19, 1994.
Hickson RC. Interference of strength development by simultaneously training for strength and endurance. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 45: 255–263, 1980.
Ikai M, Fukunaga T. Calculation of muscle strength per unit cross-sectional area of human muscle by means of ultrasonic measurement. Int Z Angew Physiol 26: 26–32, 1968.
Kazior Z, Willis SJ, Moberg M, et al. Endurance exercise enhances the effect of strength training on muscle fiber size and protein expression of akt and mTOR. PLoS ONE 11: e0149082, 2016.
Kraemer WJ, Patton JF, Gordon SE, et al. Compatibility of high- intensity strength and endurance training on hormonal and skeletal muscle adaptations. Eur J Appl Physiol 78: 976–989, 1995.
Kyröläinen H, Avela J, McBride JM, et al. Effects of power training on muscle structure and neuromuscular performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 15: 58–64, 2005.
Little JP, Safdar A, Wilkin GP, Tarnopolsky MA, Gibala MJ. A practical model of low-volume high-intensity interval training induces mitochondrial biogenesis in human skeletal muscle: Potential mechanisms. J Physiol 588: 1011–1022, 2010.
Liu Y, Schlumberger A, Wirth K, Schmidtbleicher D, Steinacker JM. Different effects on human skeletal myosin heavy chain isoform expression: Strength vs. combination training. J Appl Physiol 94: 2282–2288, 2003.
Lundberg TR, Fernandez-Gonzalo R, Gustafsson T, Tesch PA. Aerobic exercise does not compromise muscle hypertrophy response to short-term resistance training. J Appl Physiol 114: 81–89, 2012.
Lundberg TR, Fernandez-Gonzalo R, Tesch PA. Exercise-induced AMPK activation does not interfere with muscle hypertrophy in response to resistance training in men. J Appl Physiol 116: 611–620, 2014.
Malisoux L, Francaux M, Nielens H, Theisen D. Stretch-shortening cycle exercises: An effective training paradigm to enhance power output of human single muscle fibers. Eur J Appl Physiol 100: 771–779, 2006.
Markovic G, Mikulic P. Neuro-musculoskeletal and performance adaptations to lower-extremity plyometric training. Sports Med 40: 859–895, 2010.
Methenitis S. A brief review on concurrent training: From laboratory to the field. Sports (Basel) 6: 127, 2018.
Methenitis SK, Zaras ND, Spengos KM, et al. Role of muscle morphology in jumping, sprinting, and throwing performance in participants with different power training duration experience. J Strength Cond Res 30: 807–817, 2016.
Mikkola J, Rusko H, Izquierdo M, Gorostiaga EM, Häkkinen K. Neuromuscular and cardiovascular adaptations during concurrent strength and endurance training in untrained men. Int J Sports Med 33: 702–710, 2012.
Murlasits Z, Kneffel Z, Thalib L. The physiological effects of concurrent strength and endurance training sequence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci 36: 1212–1219, 2018.
Place N, Casartelli N, Glatthorn JF, Maffiuletti NA. Comparison of quadriceps inactivation between nerve and muscle stimulation. Muscle Nerve 42: 894–900, 2010.
Sayers SP, Harackiewicz DV, Harman EA, Frykman PN, Rosenstein MT. Cross-validation of three jump power equations. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31: 572–577, 1999.
Silva RF, Cadore EL, Kothe G, et al. Concurrent training with different aerobic exercises. Int J Sports Med 33: 627–634, 2012.
Stasinaki AN, Gloumis G, Spengos K, et al. Muscle strength, power, and morphologic adaptations after 6 weeks of compound vs. complex training in healthy men. J Strength Cond Res 29: 2559–2569, 2015.
Terzis G, Spengos K, Methenitis S, et al. Early phase interference between low-intensity running and power training in moderately trained females. Eur J Appl Physiol 116: 1063–1073, 2016.
Tsitkanou S, Spengos K, Stasinaki AN, et al. Effects of high-intensity interval cycling performed after resistance training on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Scand J Med Sci Sports 27: 1317–1327, 2017.
Vissing K, Brink M, Lønbro S, et al. Muscle adaptations to plyometric vs. resistance training in untrained young men. J Strength Cond Res 22: 1799–1810, 2008.
Wilson JM, Marin PJ, Rhea MR, et al. Concurrent training: A meta-analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res 26: 2293–2307, 2012.
Zajac FE, Wicke RW, Levine WS. Dependence of jumping performance on muscle properties when humans use only calf muscles for propulsion. J Biomech 17: 513–523, 1984.
Zaras N, Spengos K, Methenitis S, et al. Effects of strength vs. ballistic-power training on throwing performance. J Sports Sci Med 12: 130–137, 2013.