Observational analysis of disparities in obesity in children in the UK: Has Leeds bucked the trend?


Journal

Pediatric obesity
ISSN: 2047-6310
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Obes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101572033

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2019
Historique:
received: 01 10 2018
accepted: 01 03 2019
pubmed: 26 4 2019
medline: 11 4 2020
entrez: 26 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The prevalence of obesity in childhood is of high concern, especially in deprived populations. We explored trends in obesity following the introduction of a citywide strategy focused on preschool children. Analysis of obesity prevalence using the National Child Measurement Programme 2009 to 2017 for primary-school children in Leeds using 5-year aggregated data for Leeds, comparable cities, and England as a whole. Prevalence of obesity in Leeds for school entry children fell significantly (9.4% to 8.8%), whilst comparable cities (CC) and England as a whole showed no change (comparison of trends: P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). The reduction in Leeds was primarily in the most deprived (11.5% to 10.5%; trend comparison CC: P < 0.001, Eng: P < 0.001), but also amongst the affluent (6.8% to 6.0%; trend comparison CC: P = 0.087, Eng: P = 0.012). Prevalence in older children in Leeds was unchanged whilst it increased for comparable cities and England (trend comparison CC: P < 0.001, Eng: P < 0.001). In the deprived, obesity increased: Leeds by 1.4%; CC 1.3%, England 1% (trend comparison Eng: P = 0.004). In the affluent, obesity prevalence reduced more in Leeds than elsewhere: 2% in Leeds, 0.8% in CC, and 0.7% in England (trend comparison CC: P < 0.001, Eng: P ≤ 0.001). There has been a notable decrease in the prevalence of obesity especially amongst the most disadvantaged children at entry to primary school in Leeds. How this was achieved merits in-depth consideration.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The prevalence of obesity in childhood is of high concern, especially in deprived populations. We explored trends in obesity following the introduction of a citywide strategy focused on preschool children.
METHODS
Analysis of obesity prevalence using the National Child Measurement Programme 2009 to 2017 for primary-school children in Leeds using 5-year aggregated data for Leeds, comparable cities, and England as a whole.
RESULTS
Prevalence of obesity in Leeds for school entry children fell significantly (9.4% to 8.8%), whilst comparable cities (CC) and England as a whole showed no change (comparison of trends: P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). The reduction in Leeds was primarily in the most deprived (11.5% to 10.5%; trend comparison CC: P < 0.001, Eng: P < 0.001), but also amongst the affluent (6.8% to 6.0%; trend comparison CC: P = 0.087, Eng: P = 0.012). Prevalence in older children in Leeds was unchanged whilst it increased for comparable cities and England (trend comparison CC: P < 0.001, Eng: P < 0.001). In the deprived, obesity increased: Leeds by 1.4%; CC 1.3%, England 1% (trend comparison Eng: P = 0.004). In the affluent, obesity prevalence reduced more in Leeds than elsewhere: 2% in Leeds, 0.8% in CC, and 0.7% in England (trend comparison CC: P < 0.001, Eng: P ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
There has been a notable decrease in the prevalence of obesity especially amongst the most disadvantaged children at entry to primary school in Leeds. How this was achieved merits in-depth consideration.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31022330
doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12529
pmc: PMC6767538
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e12529

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Authors. Pediatric Obesity published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of World Obesity Federation.

Références

Pediatr Obes. 2019 Sep;14(9):e12529
pubmed: 31022330
Community Pract. 2013 Jul;86(7):23-7
pubmed: 23914474
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2012 Oct;25(5):460-8
pubmed: 22489933
Pediatr Obes. 2014 Oct;9(5):339-50
pubmed: 23818487
Public Health. 2016 Jul;136:101-8
pubmed: 27184820
Nutr Diabetes. 2016 Mar 07;6:e200
pubmed: 26950481
Child Care Health Dev. 2010 Nov;36(6):850-7
pubmed: 20637028
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2510-20
pubmed: 25703114
Child Obes. 2018 Mar;14(S1):S12-S21
pubmed: 29565653
Arch Dis Child. 1995 Jul;73(1):25-9
pubmed: 7639544

Auteurs

Mary Rudolf (M)

Department of Population Health, Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel.

Rafael Perera (R)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Di Swanston (D)

HENRY, Oxfordshire, UK.

Janice Burberry (J)

Public Health (Children and Families) Adults and Health Directorate, Leeds, UK.

Kim Roberts (K)

HENRY, Oxfordshire, UK.

Susan Jebb (S)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH