Perception Versus Reaction: Comparison of Tinnitus Psychoacoustic Measures and Tinnitus Functional Index Scores.


Journal

American journal of audiology
ISSN: 1558-9137
Titre abrégé: Am J Audiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9114917

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Apr 2019
Historique:
entrez: 26 4 2019
pubmed: 26 4 2019
medline: 4 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Purpose Psychoacoustic characteristics of tinnitus include its loudness and pitch. These characteristics are commonly measured and reported; however, it has not been shown that they are associated with the impact, or bothersomeness, of tinnitus. This study addressed this question by determining correlations between measures of tinnitus loudness, tinnitus pitch, and functional effects of tinnitus. Method Tinnitus loudness matches, pitch matches, a numeric rating scale (NRS) of tinnitus loudness, and responses to the 25-item tinnitus functional index (TFI) were obtained from 223 participants who experienced tinnitus for at least 6 months. Estimates of tinnitus pitch were calculated by use of a Bayesian sequential analysis technique. Results The total TFI score, as well as each of its 8 subscales, had weak or no correlations with both loudness matches and pitch matches, but moderate correlations with the NRS. Conclusions Psychoacoustic measurements used to estimate aspects of tinnitus perception appear unrelated to the impact of tinnitus, as assessed by a subjective outcome instrument. These psychoacoustic measurements do not assess reactions to tinnitus. These reactions should be measured by validated questionnaires, such as the TFI, which are designed to measure tinnitus impact. The moderate correlations between the NRS and the TFI suggest that self-reported tinnitus loudness is more a measure of tinnitus reactions than perception.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31022361
doi: 10.1044/2018_AJA-TTR17-18-0041
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

174-180

Subventions

Organisme : RRD VA
ID : I01 RX001205
Pays : United States
Organisme : RRD VA
ID : IK6 RX002990
Pays : United States

Auteurs

Candice Manning (C)

National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, OR.
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.

Emily J Thielman (EJ)

National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, OR.

Leslie Grush (L)

National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, OR.

James A Henry (JA)

National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System, OR.
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH