Ipsilesional Impairments of Visual Awareness After Right-Hemispheric Stroke.
consciousness
hemianopia
ipsilesional
neglect
spatial awareness
spatial processing
stroke
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
30
11
2018
accepted:
13
03
2019
entrez:
27
4
2019
pubmed:
27
4
2019
medline:
27
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Unilateral brain damage following stroke frequently hampers the processing of contralesional space. Whether and how it also affects the processing of stimuli appearing on the same side of the lesion is still poorly understood. Three main alternative hypotheses have been proposed, namely that ipsilesional processing is functionally (i) hyperefficient, (ii) impaired, or (iii) spared. Here, we investigated ipsilesional space awareness through a computerized paradigm that exploits a manipulation of concurrent information processing demands (i.e., multitasking). Twelve chronic right-hemisphere stroke patients with a total lack of awareness for the contralesional side of space were administered a task that required the spatial monitoring of two locations within the ipsilesional hemispace. Targets were presented immediately to the right of a central fixation point (3° eccentricity), or farther to the right toward the screen edge (17° eccentricity), or on both locations. Response to target position occurred either in isolation or while performing a concurrent visual or auditory task. Results showed that most errors occurred when two targets were simultaneously presented and patients were faced with additional task demands (in the visual or auditory modalities). In the context of concurrent visual load, ipsilesional targets presented at the rightmost location were omitted more frequently than those presented closer to fixation. This pattern qualifies ipsilesional processing in right-hemisphere stroke patients as functionally impaired, arguing against the notion of ipsilesional hyperperformance, especially when under visual load.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31024378
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00697
pmc: PMC6465520
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
697Références
Neurology. 1999 Dec 10;53(9):2023-7
pubmed: 10599775
Neuroreport. 1999 Nov 8;10(16):3353-7
pubmed: 10599844
Cognition. 2001 Apr;79(1-2):39-88
pubmed: 11164023
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2001 Jan;25(1):1-13
pubmed: 11166074
Behav Neurol. 2000;12(4):191-200
pubmed: 11568431
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001 Oct;23(5):599-607
pubmed: 11778637
JAMA. 2002 Nov 13;288(18):2271-81
pubmed: 12425704
Int J Neurosci. 1992 Jan;62(1-2):45-56
pubmed: 1342013
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003 Dec;25(8):1154-68
pubmed: 14566587
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(3):346-58
pubmed: 14670573
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Nov;55(11):1060-8
pubmed: 1469403
Neuroreport. 2004 Oct 5;15(14):2189-93
pubmed: 15371731
Brain. 2006 Jan;129(Pt 1):168-81
pubmed: 16317021
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jan 28;45(2):263-72
pubmed: 16973180
Neuropsychologia. 1991;29(10):1019-27
pubmed: 1762670
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991 Dec;54(12):1082-9
pubmed: 1783922
Brain. 2007 Dec;130(Pt 12):3211-22
pubmed: 17905795
Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 1;39(3):1215-26
pubmed: 18023365
Cortex. 2009 Mar;45(3):293-9
pubmed: 18708186
Cortex. 2009 Mar;45(3):300-12
pubmed: 18708187
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jan;47(1):91-103
pubmed: 18790703
J Neuropsychol. 2010 Mar;4(Pt 1):33-45
pubmed: 19338727
Nature. 1991 Apr 11;350(6318):498-500
pubmed: 2014049
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Nov;48(13):3934-40
pubmed: 20801136
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;82(8):862-8
pubmed: 21242287
Eur J Neurol. 1996 May;3(3):198-202
pubmed: 21284770
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011;34:569-99
pubmed: 21692662
Neuropsychology. 2012 Jan;26(1):20-36
pubmed: 21895377
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):957-65
pubmed: 22440645
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 04;6:110
pubmed: 22586384
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 21;6:125
pubmed: 22661935
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 17;6:195
pubmed: 22822394
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Aug;1296:50-74
pubmed: 23751037
Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(6):974-93
pubmed: 25181562
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jul 30;9:413
pubmed: 26283942
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Apr;37(4):1405-21
pubmed: 26756101
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;60(3):186-190
pubmed: 26830087
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Nov;92:147-157
pubmed: 26948071
Cortex. 1989 Sep;25(3):503-15
pubmed: 2805737
Cortex. 2017 Jul;92:320-321
pubmed: 28454716
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Nov;40(22):2677-2691
pubmed: 28697652
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018;36(2):275-291
pubmed: 29526854
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Mar 15;:null
pubmed: 29551364
Cortex. 2018 Jun;103:82-99
pubmed: 29574253
Neuropsychology. 2018 Oct;32(7):835-842
pubmed: 29975073
Neuropsychology. 2018 Oct;32(7):850-865
pubmed: 30321035
Neurology. 1988 Aug;38(8):1207-11
pubmed: 3399068
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987 Feb;68(2):98-102
pubmed: 3813864
Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25
pubmed: 7367577
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995 May;17(3):383-9
pubmed: 7650101
J Am Optom Assoc. 1993 Jan;64(1):71-9
pubmed: 8454831
Eur Neurol. 1996;36(6):378-84
pubmed: 8954307
Neuropsychologia. 1997 Nov;35(11):1445-58
pubmed: 9352522
JAMA. 1998 Apr 8;279(14):1083-8
pubmed: 9546567
Nature. 1998 Sep 10;395(6698):169-72
pubmed: 9744274
Brain. 1998 Sep;121 ( Pt 9):1759-70
pubmed: 9762963