In-office treatment of nasal valve obstruction using a novel, bipolar radiofrequency device.
Nasal valve
minimally invasive surgery
nasal obstruction
nasal surgery
radio‐frequency
Journal
Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology
ISSN: 2378-8038
Titre abrégé: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101684963
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
02
10
2018
revised:
26
11
2018
accepted:
03
01
2019
entrez:
27
4
2019
pubmed:
27
4
2019
medline:
27
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess the safety and effectiveness of in-office bipolar radiofrequency treatment of nasal valve obstruction. Prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter case series. Adult patients with a Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale (NOSE) score ≥60 were selected. Patients were clinically diagnosed with dynamic or static internal nasal valve obstruction as primary or significant contributor to obstruction and were required to have a positive response to nasal mechanical dilators or lateralization maneuvers. Bilateral radio-frequency treatment was applied intranasally using a novel device, under local anesthesia in a single session. Safety and tolerance were assessed by event reporting, inspection, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain. Efficacy was determined using the NOSE score and patient-reported satisfaction survey at 26 weeks. Fifty patients were treated. No device or procedure-related serious adverse events occurred. Soreness, edema, and crusting resolved by 1 month. The mean baseline NOSE score was 79.9 (SD 10.8, range 60-100), and all had severe or extreme obstruction. At 26 weeks, mean NOSE score was 69% lower at 24.7 ( In office treatment of internal nasal valve obstruction using a bipolar radiofrequency device is safe and well-tolerated. Nasal obstruction, as assessed using the NOSE questionnaire at 26 weeks, was markedly improved with high patient satisfaction. 2b, prospective cohort.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31024989
doi: 10.1002/lio2.247
pii: LIO2247
pmc: PMC6476263
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
211-217Références
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003 Jan-Feb;5(1):46-52
pubmed: 12533139
Am J Rhinol. 2003 Mar-Apr;17(2):107-10
pubmed: 12751706
Laryngoscope. 2003 Jul;113(7):1118-22
pubmed: 12838007
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Feb;130(2):157-63
pubmed: 14990910
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Mar;130(3):283-90
pubmed: 15054368
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004 May-Jun;6(3):167-71
pubmed: 15148124
Am J Rhinol. 2004 May-Jun;18(3):143-50
pubmed: 15283487
Facial Plast Surg. 2006 Nov;22(4):266-80
pubmed: 17131269
Laryngoscope. 2006 Dec;116(12):2129-32
pubmed: 17146384
Laryngoscope. 2007 Dec;117(12):2100-6
pubmed: 18322421
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jul;139(1):10-20
pubmed: 18585555
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009 Apr;42(2):207-25, vii
pubmed: 19328887
Laryngoscope. 2009 Jul;119(7):1281-90
pubmed: 19422026
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Oct;135(10):1010-4
pubmed: 19841340
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Dec;34(6):518-25
pubmed: 20070760
Ann Biomed Eng. 2010 Nov;38(11):3389-97
pubmed: 20614240
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Jul;143(1):48-59
pubmed: 20620619
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Jun;65(6):732-8
pubmed: 22197029
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012 Jan-Feb;14(1):14-9
pubmed: 22250264
Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Sep;44(7):572-9
pubmed: 22886463
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013 Sep-Oct;15(5):358-61
pubmed: 23846399
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 May-Jun;16(3):219-25; quiz 232
pubmed: 24604253
Clin Otolaryngol. 2015 Dec;40(6):698-703
pubmed: 25943502
Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Feb;32(1):3-8
pubmed: 26862957
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2016 Aug;24(3):219-34
pubmed: 27400837
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 May;156(5):809-815
pubmed: 28168892
Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Apr;33(2):233-240
pubmed: 28388804
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Aug;157(2):325-330
pubmed: 28418779
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Jul 1;20(4):307-313
pubmed: 29543934