Mechanical Safety of Embedded Electronics for In-body Wearables: A Smart Mouthguard Study.
Embedded electronics
FEM
Impact
Mechanical assessment
Thermoformed
Journal
Annals of biomedical engineering
ISSN: 1573-9686
Titre abrégé: Ann Biomed Eng
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0361512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
12
01
2019
accepted:
06
04
2019
pubmed:
27
4
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
27
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The growing popularity of contact sports drives the requirement for better design of protective equipment, such as mouthguards. Smart mouthguards with embedded electronics provide a multitude of new ways to provide increased safety and protection to users. Characterisation of how electronic components embedded in typical mouthguard material, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), behave under typical sports impacts is crucial for future designs. A novel pendulum impact rig using a hockey ball disc impactor was developed to investigate impact forces and component failure. Two sets of dental models (aluminium and plastic padding chemical metal) were used to manufacture post-thermoformed mouthguards. Seven embedding conditions with varying thickness of EVA (1.5 and 3 mm) and locations of electrical components were tested. Component failures were observed in four out of seven test conditions, and the experimental failure forces at which the electrical component had a 50% chance of failure were reported for those cases. The experimental results showed that an EVA thickness of 3 mm surrounding the electrical component gives the most comprehensive protection even under extreme surface conformity. Computational models on surface conformity of EVA showed that a block of EVA with a minimum thickness of 1.5 mm was better at reducing stress concentration than a shell with an overall thickness of 1.5 mm. This study demonstrated that the thickness of a mouthguard is important when protecting electrical components from extreme dental surface conformity, furthermore the surface geometry should not be overlooked when considering electrical component safety for in-body wearables that are impact prone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31025132
doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02267-4
pii: 10.1007/s10439-019-02267-4
pmc: PMC6647539
doi:
Substances chimiques
Polyvinyls
0
ethylenevinylacetate copolymer
24937-78-8
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1725-1737Subventions
Organisme : Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
ID : EP/R511742/1
Références
Dent Traumatol. 2002 Feb;18(1):24-7
pubmed: 11841462
Dent Traumatol. 2004 Feb;20(1):12-20
pubmed: 14998410
Sports Med. 2007;37(2):117-44
pubmed: 17241103
J Athl Train. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):5-10
pubmed: 17597937
J Prosthodont. 2007 Nov-Dec;16(6):452-6
pubmed: 17672835
Dent Traumatol. 2009 Feb;25(1):130-5
pubmed: 19208026
Dent Traumatol. 2009 Dec;25(6):556-64
pubmed: 19788425
Dent Traumatol. 2010 Jun;26(3):248-53
pubmed: 20572841
Ann Biomed Eng. 2013 Sep;41(9):1939-49
pubmed: 23604848
Dent Traumatol. 2014 Jun;30(3):236-9
pubmed: 24251682
Int J Oral Sci. 2014 Jun;6(2):61-9
pubmed: 24743065
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014 Nov;61(11):2659-68
pubmed: 24800918
Saudi Dent J. 2015 Jan;27(1):50-4
pubmed: 25544815
J Biomech. 2015 Sep 18;48(12):3469-77
pubmed: 26117075
Stapp Car Crash J. 2014 Nov;58:1-27
pubmed: 26192948
Ann Biomed Eng. 2016 Apr;44(4):1234-45
pubmed: 26289941
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;50(5):298-304
pubmed: 26511002
Dent Traumatol. 2016 Oct;32(5):416-20
pubmed: 26948149
J Biomech. 2016 Jun 14;49(9):1845-1853
pubmed: 27155744
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1311-24
pubmed: 27475266
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:2007-2009
pubmed: 28268724
Dent Traumatol. 2017 Aug;33(4):288-294
pubmed: 28296061
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Apr 18;12(1):59
pubmed: 28420431
Br Dent J. 2017 Apr 21;222(8):629-633
pubmed: 28428580
Nat Commun. 2017 Aug 24;8(1):339
pubmed: 28835681
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 21;8(1):855
pubmed: 29321637