Intuition-Enabled Machine Learning Beats the Competition When Joint Human-Robot Teams Perform Inorganic Chemical Experiments.
Journal
Journal of chemical information and modeling
ISSN: 1549-960X
Titre abrégé: J Chem Inf Model
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101230060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 06 2019
24 06 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
27
4
2019
medline:
14
8
2020
entrez:
27
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Traditionally, chemists have relied on years of training and accumulated experience in order to discover new molecules. But the space of possible molecules is so vast that only a limited exploration with the traditional methods can be ever possible. This means that many opportunities for the discovery of interesting phenomena have been missed, and in addition, the inherent variability of these phenomena can make them difficult to control and understand. The current state-of-the-art is moving toward the development of automated and eventually fully autonomous systems coupled with in-line analytics and decision-making algorithms. Yet even these, despite the substantial progress achieved recently, still cannot easily tackle large combinatorial spaces, as they are limited by the lack of high-quality data. Herein, we explore the utility of active learning methods for exploring the chemical space by comparing the collaboration between human experimenters with an algorithm-based search against their performance individually to probe the self-assembly and crystallization of the polyoxometalate cluster Na
Identifiants
pubmed: 31025861
doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00304
pmc: PMC6593393
doi:
Substances chimiques
Inorganic Chemicals
0
Tungsten Compounds
0
polyoxometalate I
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2664-2671Références
Psychol Sci. 2005 Jan;16(1):70-6
pubmed: 15660854
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7714):377-381
pubmed: 30022133
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005 Aug;4(8):649-63
pubmed: 16056391
Nat Commun. 2017 Jun 09;8:15733
pubmed: 28598440
Chemistry. 2017 May 2;23(25):5966-5971
pubmed: 28134452
Nat Chem. 2012 Mar 22;4(4):237-8
pubmed: 22437693
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:255-78
pubmed: 18154502
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:451-82
pubmed: 21126183
Nature. 2016 May 5;533(7601):73-6
pubmed: 27147027
J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2003 Mar-Apr;43(2):493-500
pubmed: 12653513
Nat Chem. 2014 Oct;6(10):859-71
pubmed: 25242480
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018 Apr 9;57(16):4192-4214
pubmed: 29513400
J Cheminform. 2011 Oct 14;3(1):37
pubmed: 21999342
Nature. 2018 Mar 28;555(7698):604-610
pubmed: 29595767
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018 Feb;17(2):97-113
pubmed: 29242609
Nature. 2004 Dec 16;432(7019):855-61
pubmed: 15602551
Chem Soc Rev. 2010 May;39(5):1503-12
pubmed: 20419205
Nat Mater. 2015 Oct;14(10):973-80
pubmed: 26395941
Am Psychol. 2009 Sep;64(6):515-26
pubmed: 19739881
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31
pubmed: 17835457
Science. 2009 Apr 3;324(5923):81-5
pubmed: 19342586
Chem Soc Rev. 2016 Apr 21;45(8):2032-43
pubmed: 26815081
Mol Inform. 2016 Dec;35(11-12):615-621
pubmed: 27464907
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7715):547-555
pubmed: 30046072
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 Aug 28;56(36):10815-10820
pubmed: 28649740