The Migration of Arizona's Post-Insanity Defense Procedures to a Modified GBMI Model.
Journal
The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
ISSN: 1943-3662
Titre abrégé: J Am Acad Psychiatry Law
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9708963
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
28
4
2019
medline:
22
4
2020
entrez:
28
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Arizona's insanity defense and post-insanity procedures have evolved over the last 30 years into a unique system. Arizona moved from a typical M'Naughten-based insanity defense to an adaptation of the Oregon Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) model and then to its current form, in which the PSRB is cast in a correctional framework. These changes have resulted in a correctional statute, with outcomes that may subject the guilty except insane (GEI) offender to a disposition similar to that of someone found guilty but mentally ill (GBMI). We review the literature on the GBMI defense first developed in Michigan in the 1970s and compare Arizona's current system to the earlier GBMI models. We conclude with a discussion of Arizona's GEI verdict and implications of managing these offenders in a correctional framework, resulting in a modified GBMI statute.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31028103
pii: JAAPL.003834-19
doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003834-19
doi:
Types de publication
Historical Article
Journal Article
Legal Case
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
217-223Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2019 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.