Creating high-quality radiology reports in foreign languages through multilingual structured reporting.
Communication barriers
Multilingualism
Radiologists
Teleradiology
x-rays
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
14
12
2018
accepted:
26
03
2019
revised:
19
02
2019
pubmed:
28
4
2019
medline:
21
1
2020
entrez:
28
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Globalization and migration are increasing the demand for reports in different languages. We aimed to examine if structured reports created by non-German-speaking radiologists with multilingual templates show significant differences in quality to structured reports and free-text reports by German native speakers. We used structured templates that allow radiologists to report in their mother tongue and then switch the report language to German or English automatically using proprietary software. German- and English-speaking radiology residents created structured reports in both German and English with these templates. Reports for three different exam types were created (intensive care chest x-ray, shoulder x-ray specifically for degenerative processes, and CT pulmonary angiogram for pulmonary embolism). The report quality of automatically translated German structured reports by English-speaking radiologists and German structured reports by German radiologists was then evaluated by German clinicians with a standardized questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed to assess attributes including content, comprehensibility, clinical consequences, and overall quality. Structured reports by English-speaking radiologists that were automatically translated into German and German structured reports by German radiologists both received very high or high overall quality ratings in the majority of cases, showing no significant differences in quality. Likewise, no significant differences were observed between the two report types regarding comprehensibility and clinical consequences. Structured reports by German radiologists received significantly better ratings for overall quality and comprehensibility compared to free-text reports by German radiologists. Multilingual structured reporting templates may serve as a feasible tool for creating high-quality radiology reports in foreign languages. • Multilingualism in structured reporting templates can be a useful tool for creating high-quality radiology reports in foreign languages. • German reports created with multilingual structured reporting templates by English-speaking radiologists and German structured reports by German radiologists exhibit no significant differences in overall report quality. • Multilingual structured reporting templates can help radiologists overcome communication barriers and facilitate teleradiology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31028444
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06206-8
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06206-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6038-6048Références
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Nov;72(2):354-8
pubmed: 18667286
Insights Imaging. 2018 Feb;9(1):1-7
pubmed: 29460129
Radiology. 2015 Feb;274(2):464-72
pubmed: 25286323
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Sep;85:56-67
pubmed: 30031857
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Sep;205(3):584-8
pubmed: 26295645
Acad Radiol. 2015 Feb;22(2):226-33
pubmed: 25442793
J R Soc Med. 2012 Apr;105(4):157-65
pubmed: 22408082
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Sep-Oct;20(5):523-9
pubmed: 24084391
Acad Radiol. 2014 Jan;21(1):126-33
pubmed: 24331275
Postgrad Med J. 2011 Nov;87(1033):783-9
pubmed: 22048704
BMC Med Imaging. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):20
pubmed: 29970014
Scand J Public Health. 2017 Jun;45(4):428-435
pubmed: 28381112
Acad Psychiatry. 2012 Jul 1;36(4):323-9
pubmed: 22851031
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Mar;176(3):591-8
pubmed: 11222186
J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 Apr;4(4):217-23
pubmed: 17412271
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Mar;14(3):371-379.e1
pubmed: 27932248
Radiographics. 2015 Mar-Apr;35(2):547-54
pubmed: 25763738
Acta Radiol. 2000 Jan;41(1):102-5
pubmed: 10665882
SAGE Open Med. 2014 Dec 16;2:2050312114563101
pubmed: 26770756
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012 Jul;7(4):621-33
pubmed: 22009308
Can Fam Physician. 2013 Apr;59(4):382-3
pubmed: 23585608
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 May - Jun;11(3):188-195
pubmed: 28259629
Insights Imaging. 2011 Apr;2(2):93-96
pubmed: 22347937
Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4110-4119
pubmed: 28289942
Br J Radiol. 2018 Feb;91(1083):20170670
pubmed: 29189048
Eur Radiol. 2017 May;27(5):1934-1943
pubmed: 27572812
Insights Imaging. 2015 Feb;6(1):129-32
pubmed: 25476598
Radiology. 2009 Sep;252(3):852-6
pubmed: 19717755
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Sep;42(9):2243-2250
pubmed: 28393301
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 May;55(5):679-687
pubmed: 29627139
Hum Resour Health. 2016 Sep 23;14(1):57
pubmed: 27662831
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(8):3002-11
pubmed: 26239398
Eur Radiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):3702-3709
pubmed: 29600475
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Aug;12(8):845-7
pubmed: 26250977
Med Teach. 2004 Mar;26(2):120-5
pubmed: 15203520
Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):184-95
pubmed: 21224423
Clin Radiol. 2011 Nov;66(11):1015-22
pubmed: 21788016
Br J Radiol. 2010 Jan;83(985):17-22
pubmed: 19470574
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Jan;73(1):20-5
pubmed: 19914019
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Sep;14(9):1206-1211
pubmed: 28483546
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jan;28(1):308-315
pubmed: 28755055
Radiology. 2011 Jul;260(1):174-81
pubmed: 21518775
Acad Radiol. 2018 Jan;25(1):66-73
pubmed: 29030284
Clin Radiol. 2013 Nov;68(11):1146-54
pubmed: 23948663
Invest Radiol. 2017 Apr;52(4):232-239
pubmed: 27861230
Radiology. 2009 Oct;253(1):74-80
pubmed: 19709993
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Jul;1(7):497-505
pubmed: 17411639