Effects of Thoracic Paravertebral Block on Nociceptive Levels After Skin Incision During Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.
Aged
Anesthesia, Conduction
/ methods
Anesthesia, General
/ methods
Cohort Studies
Dermatologic Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Female
Heart Rate
/ drug effects
Humans
Male
Monitoring, Intraoperative
/ methods
Nerve Block
/ methods
Nociceptive Pain
/ prevention & control
Pain Measurement
Pain, Postoperative
/ prevention & control
Propensity Score
Retrospective Studies
Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted
/ adverse effects
Journal
Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research
ISSN: 1643-3750
Titre abrégé: Med Sci Monit
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9609063
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Apr 2019
28 Apr 2019
Historique:
entrez:
29
4
2019
pubmed:
29
4
2019
medline:
19
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND Regional anesthesia provides excellent analgesic effects after surgery. However, the effects of regional anesthesia on nociceptive levels during surgery under general anesthesia have not been quantitatively evaluated. To reveal the effects of thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) on nociceptive levels after skin incision during general anesthesia, we performed a retrospective cohort study in patients without serious preoperative conditions or comorbidities undergoing elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Nociceptive levels during general anesthesia were calculated using our previously determined Nociceptive Response (NR) equation, which utilizes common hemodynamic parameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data on 77 adult patients who underwent VATS from May 2018 to August 2018 were retrospectively obtained from our institutional database. We then performed propensity score matching between patients who received thoracic PVB (PVB group: n=29) and those who did not (Control group: n=48). The averaged values of systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), perfusion index (PI), bispectral index (BIS), and NR from 10 to 5 minutes before skin incision (T0), 5 to 10 minutes (T1), 10 to 15 minutes (T2), 15 to 20 minutes (T3), and 20 to 25 minutes after skin incision (T4), were calculated. RESULTS Twenty-four propensity score-matched patients in each group were analyzed. Mean NR values at T1 and T2 in the PVB group were significantly lower than those in the Control group. SBP, HR, PI, and BIS, however, showed no significant differences between the 2 groups, except for SBP at T2. CONCLUSIONS Thoracic PVB prevented an increase in NR values, which quantitatively represent nociceptive levels under general anesthesia, in patients undergoing VATS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31030206
pii: 914354
doi: 10.12659/MSM.914354
pmc: PMC6503748
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3140-3145Références
J Physiol. 2009 Jan 15;587(1):183-93
pubmed: 19015194
J Clin Monit Comput. 2013 Dec;27(6):659-68
pubmed: 23835792
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Jun;27(2):235-47
pubmed: 24012235
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 May;18(5):626-35
pubmed: 24488821
Clin Invest Med. 2015 Dec 04;38(6):E351-7
pubmed: 26654517
Front Neurol. 2016 Jun 30;7:109
pubmed: 27445972
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;154:98-103
pubmed: 28183036
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Apr;32(2):915-927
pubmed: 29169795
J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14(Supplement):S213-S217
pubmed: 29578176
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Dec;31(4):445-467
pubmed: 29739535
Med Sci Monit. 2018 May 20;24:3324-3331
pubmed: 29779036
Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Dec;84(12):1361-1368
pubmed: 29991223
Medicina (Kaunas). 2018 Oct 23;54(5):null
pubmed: 30360531