Temporary axial rotation stabilization for lumbar disc herniation surgery with the ARO
Intervertebral disc displacement
axial rotation
discectomy
implant
low back pain
Journal
Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)
ISSN: 2414-469X
Titre abrégé: J Spine Surg
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101685460
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
entrez:
30
4
2019
pubmed:
30
4
2019
medline:
30
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Decompressive surgery has a failure rate of between 25% and 32% based on patient reported improvement in clinical symptoms. Significant back pain is associated with 53% of failures of decompressive surgery, while also being associated with abnormal axial rotation motion. We report on the clinical performance of subjects receiving a novel axial rotation stabilization implant (ARO Spinal System, ARO Medical), while undergoing a surgical decompression for a herniated lumbar disc, a condition associated with low back pain and abnormal movement. This Danish Medicines Agency and Ethics Committee approved clinical trial prospectively investigated the use of the ARO No complications with the implant were observed. Four serious adverse events not related to the devices were reported, one subject had reoperation at 3 months. Leg pain median VAS score decreased from 70 to 2 at 1 year (P=0.01) back pain median VAS score from 48 to 6 (P=0.04). Satisfaction with surgery was 88%. Oswestry Disability Index scored likewise improvement going from 38 pre-operative to 5 at 1 year. Follow-up rate was excellent 100%. Discectomy with the ARO Spinal System proves equally safe as a standard discectomy at 1 year follow-up. The subjects had significant improvements in both leg and back pain. In addition, they did better than historical controls, though not statistically so in this patient sample.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Decompressive surgery has a failure rate of between 25% and 32% based on patient reported improvement in clinical symptoms. Significant back pain is associated with 53% of failures of decompressive surgery, while also being associated with abnormal axial rotation motion. We report on the clinical performance of subjects receiving a novel axial rotation stabilization implant (ARO Spinal System, ARO Medical), while undergoing a surgical decompression for a herniated lumbar disc, a condition associated with low back pain and abnormal movement.
METHODS
METHODS
This Danish Medicines Agency and Ethics Committee approved clinical trial prospectively investigated the use of the ARO
RESULTS
RESULTS
No complications with the implant were observed. Four serious adverse events not related to the devices were reported, one subject had reoperation at 3 months. Leg pain median VAS score decreased from 70 to 2 at 1 year (P=0.01) back pain median VAS score from 48 to 6 (P=0.04). Satisfaction with surgery was 88%. Oswestry Disability Index scored likewise improvement going from 38 pre-operative to 5 at 1 year. Follow-up rate was excellent 100%.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Discectomy with the ARO Spinal System proves equally safe as a standard discectomy at 1 year follow-up. The subjects had significant improvements in both leg and back pain. In addition, they did better than historical controls, though not statistically so in this patient sample.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31032447
doi: 10.21037/jss.2018.12.13
pii: jss-05-01-124
pmc: PMC6465462
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
124-131Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: Dr. Cody Bünger reports grants, personal fees, non-financial support and other from University of Aarhus, grants from “Spydspidspulje” (Public funded by the hospital) for growth rod project, grants from Danish Strategic Research Foundation, grants from Mærsk Foundation, grants from Danish Rheumatism Association, grants from Danish Regional Fund, personal fees from Stryker, personal fees from Globus Medical, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from DePuy Synthes, outside the submitted work; and hold global patents for early-onset scoliosis instrumentation, not applied in the study. Bruce Robie reports ownership interest in ARO Medical. Other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
J Spinal Disord. 2000 Oct;13(5):444-50
pubmed: 11052356
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952
pubmed: 11074683
Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43
pubmed: 11491192
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Aug;23(7):1110-6
pubmed: 12169466
Eur Spine J. 2002 Oct;11 Suppl 2:S198-205
pubmed: 12384745
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004 Aug;17(4):284-90
pubmed: 15280756
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Jan;17(1):74-80
pubmed: 1531557
Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6 Suppl):190S-194S
pubmed: 15541666
Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):9-19
pubmed: 15621359
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Mar 1;30(5):E109-14
pubmed: 15738772
Int Orthop. 2005 Aug;29(4):260-4
pubmed: 15937695
JAMA. 2006 Nov 22;296(20):2441-50
pubmed: 17119140
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 1;32(7):748-55
pubmed: 17414908
Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):541-6
pubmed: 17448732
Neurosurgery. 1991 Aug;29(2):301-7; discussion 307-8
pubmed: 1886676
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 1;33(25):2789-800
pubmed: 19018250
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Dec 16;149(12):845-53
pubmed: 19075203
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):953-74
pubmed: 23575657
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Feb;41(3):265-73
pubmed: 26335675
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Mar;29(2):72-7
pubmed: 26889990
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 1;42(13):E767-E774
pubmed: 27831966
Eur Spine J. 1995;4(3):169-75; discussion 135
pubmed: 7552651