Surgical Correction of Craniofacial Microsomia: Evaluation of Interventions in 565 Patients at Three Major Craniofacial Units.
Adolescent
Age Factors
Boston
Child
Facial Asymmetry
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Goldenhar Syndrome
/ complications
Humans
International Cooperation
London
Male
Mandible
/ abnormalities
Netherlands
Orthopedic Procedures
/ methods
Prospective Studies
Plastic Surgery Procedures
/ methods
Reoperation
/ statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Time-to-Treatment
Treatment Outcome
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery
ISSN: 1529-4242
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1306050
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
entrez:
30
4
2019
pubmed:
30
4
2019
medline:
23
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Craniofacial microsomia is characterized by an asymmetric hypoplasia of derivatives of the first and second pharyngeal arch, leading to a variety of phenotypic presentations. Studies on surgical correction of patients with craniofacial microsomia have small cohorts, leaving controversial opinions on the optimal treatment modality, the indication for surgery, and the optimal timing of surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the types of, timing of, and total number of surgical corrections performed and the number of surgical procedures in correlation to the severity of the phenotype. A retrospective chart study was conducted including patients diagnosed with craniofacial microsomia from three large craniofacial units. Demographic, radiographic, and clinical information was obtained, including type and number of surgical procedures and age at the time of surgery. A total of 565 patients were included. In total, 443 (78.4 percent) of all patients underwent some form of surgery during their life, varying from skin tag removal to major craniofacial operations. The number of surgical interventions was higher with increasing severity of phenotype, bilateral presentation, and a younger age at the first intervention. Multiple surgical corrections are frequently seen in patients with a more severe or bilateral presentation. Furthermore, those who are treated earlier in life for correction of asymmetry of the mandible will undergo significantly more surgical procedures to correct the asymmetry later on, independent of the Pruzansky-Kaban type mandible. A prospective international multicenter study is designed with a uniform registration and outcome measurement tool to identify the optimal treatment strategy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Craniofacial microsomia is characterized by an asymmetric hypoplasia of derivatives of the first and second pharyngeal arch, leading to a variety of phenotypic presentations. Studies on surgical correction of patients with craniofacial microsomia have small cohorts, leaving controversial opinions on the optimal treatment modality, the indication for surgery, and the optimal timing of surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the types of, timing of, and total number of surgical corrections performed and the number of surgical procedures in correlation to the severity of the phenotype.
METHODS
A retrospective chart study was conducted including patients diagnosed with craniofacial microsomia from three large craniofacial units. Demographic, radiographic, and clinical information was obtained, including type and number of surgical procedures and age at the time of surgery.
RESULTS
A total of 565 patients were included. In total, 443 (78.4 percent) of all patients underwent some form of surgery during their life, varying from skin tag removal to major craniofacial operations. The number of surgical interventions was higher with increasing severity of phenotype, bilateral presentation, and a younger age at the first intervention.
CONCLUSIONS
Multiple surgical corrections are frequently seen in patients with a more severe or bilateral presentation. Furthermore, those who are treated earlier in life for correction of asymmetry of the mandible will undergo significantly more surgical procedures to correct the asymmetry later on, independent of the Pruzansky-Kaban type mandible. A prospective international multicenter study is designed with a uniform registration and outcome measurement tool to identify the optimal treatment strategy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31033829
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005554
pii: 00006534-201905000-00034
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1467-1476Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Werler MM, Starr JR, Cloonan YK, Speltz ML. Hemifacial microsomia: From gestation to childhood. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(Suppl 1):664–669.
Keogh IJ, Troulis MJ, Monroy AA, Eavey RD, Kaban LB. Isolated microtia as a marker for unsuspected hemifacial microsomia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133:997–1001.
Hartsfield JK. Review of the etiologic heterogeneity of the oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum (hemifacial microsomia). Orthod Craniofac Res. 2007;10:121–128.
Horgan JE, Padwa BL, LaBrie RA, Mulliken JB. OMENS-Plus: Analysis of craniofacial and extracraniofacial anomalies in hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995;32:405–412.
Birgfeld CB, Luquetti DV, Gougoutas AJ, et al. A phenotypic assessment tool for craniofacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:313–320.
Caron CJJM, Pluijmers BI, Wolvius EB, et al. Craniofacial and extracraniofacial anomalies in craniofacial microsomia: A multicenter study of 755 patients’. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45:1302–1310.
Kaban LB. Mandibular asymmetry and the fourth dimension. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(Suppl 1):622–631.
Birgfeld CB, Heike C. Craniofacial microsomia. Semin Plast Surg. 2012;26:91–104.
Heike CL, Luquetti DV, Hing AV. Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, et al. Craniofacial microsomia overview. In: GeneReviews. 1993.Seattle: University of Washington.
Vento AR, LaBrie RA, Mulliken JB. The O.M.E.N.S. classification of hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:68–76; discussion 77.
Heike CL, Hing AV, Aspinall CA, et al. Clinical care in craniofacial microsomia: A review of current management recommendations and opportunities to advance research. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2013;163C:271–282.
Cline JM, Hicks KE, Patel KG. Characterization of facial paresis in hemifacial microsomia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150:188–193.
Pruzansky S. Not all dwarfed mandibles are alike. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1969;1969:120–129.
Kaban LB, Mulliken JB, Murray JE. Three-dimensional approach to analysis and treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate J. 1981;18:90–99.
Kaban LB, Moses MH, Mulliken JB. Surgical correction of hemifacial microsomia in the growing child. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82:9–19.
Pluijmers BI, Caron CJ, Dunaway DJ, Wolvius EB, Koudstaal MJ. Mandibular reconstruction in the growing patient with unilateral craniofacial microsomia: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:286–295.
Nagy K, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Mommaerts MY. No evidence for long-term effectiveness of early osteodistraction in hemifacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:2061–2071.
Nakajima H, Sakamoto Y, Tamada I, Ogata H, Kishi K, Sakamoto T. Maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction for hemifacial microsomia. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011;39:549–553.
Yamauchi K, Kanno T, Ariyoshi W, Funaki K, Takahashi T. Use of an alveolar distraction device for repositioning the maxillary segment to correct asymmetry of the maxillomandibular complex. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:1398–1401.
Vu HL, Panchal J, Levine N. Combined simultaneous distraction osteogenesis of the maxilla and mandible using a single distraction device in hemifacial microsomia. J Craniofac Surg. 2001;12:253–258.
Sant’Anna EF, Lau GW, Marquezan M, de Souza Araújo MT, Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Combined maxillary and mandibular distraction osteogenesis in patients with hemifacial microsomia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;147:566–577.
Kim JT, Ng SW, Kim YH. Application of various compositions of thoracodorsal perforator flap for craniofacial contour deformities. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:902–910.
Cohen SR, Rutrick RE, Burstein FD. Distraction osteogenesis of the human craniofacial skeleton: Initial experience with new distraction system. J Craniofac Surg. 1995;6:368–374.
Munro IR. Treatment of craniofacial microsomia. Clin Plast Surg. 1987;14:177–186.
Meazzini MC, Mazzoleni F, Bozzetti A, Brusati R. Comparison of mandibular vertical growth in hemifacial microsomia patients treated with early distraction or not treated: Follow up till the completion of growth. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40:105–111.
Wan DC, Taub PJ, Allam KA, et al. Distraction osteogenesis of costocartilaginous rib grafts and treatment algorithm for severely hypoplastic mandibles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:2005–2013.
McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:1–8; discussion 910.
Huisinga-Fischer CE, Vaandrager JM, Prahl-Andersen B. Longitudinal results of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14:924–933.
Padwa BL, Mulliken JB, Maghen A, Kaban LB. Midfacial growth after costochondral graft construction of the mandibular ramus in hemifacial microsomia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;56:122–127; discussion 127128.
Guo L, Ferraro NF, Padwa BL, Kaban LB, Upton J. Vascularized fibular graft for pediatric mandibular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:2095–2105.
Andrade NN, Raikwar K. Medpor in maxillofacial deformities: Report of three cases. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2009;8:192–195.
Ohtani J, Hoffman WY, Vargervik K, Oberoi S. Team management and treatment outcomes for patients with hemifacial microsomia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141(Suppl):S74–S81.
Nagata S. Modification of the stages in total reconstruction of the auricle: Part IV. Ear elevation for the constructed auricle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:254–266; discussion 267268.
Nagata S. Modification of the stages in total reconstruction of the auricle: Part III. Grafting the three-dimensional costal cartilage framework for small concha-type microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:243–253; discussion 267268.
Nagata S. Modification of the stages in total reconstruction of the auricle: Part II. Grafting the three-dimensional costal cartilage framework for concha-type microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:231–242; discussion 267268.
Brent B. Microtia repair with rib cartilage grafts: A review of personal experience with 1000 cases. Clin Plast Surg. 2002;29:257–271, vii.
Brent B. Ear reconstruction with an expansile framework of autogenous rib cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;53:619–628.
Reinisch JF, Lewin S. Ear reconstruction using a porous polyethylene framework and temporoparietal fascia flap. Facial Plast Surg. 2009;25:181–189.
Pan B, Jiang H, Guo D, Huang C, Hu S, Zhuang H. Microtia: Ear reconstruction using tissue expander and autogenous costal cartilage. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(Suppl 1):S98–103.
Tanna N, Wan DC, Kawamoto HK, Bradley JP. Craniofacial microsomia soft-tissue reconstruction comparison: Infra mammary extended circumflex scapular flap versus serial fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:802–811.
Iñigo F, Jimenez-Murat Y, Arroyo O, Fernandez M, Ysunza A. Restoration of facial contour in Romberg’s disease and hemifacial microsomia: Experience with 118 cases. Microsurgery 2000;20:167–172.
Longaker MT, Siebert JW. Microsurgical correction of facial contour in congenital craniofacial malformations: The marriage of hard and soft tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98:942–950.
Saadeh PB, Chang CC, Warren SM, Reavey P, McCarthy JG, Siebert JW. Microsurgical correction of facial contour deformities in patients with craniofacial malformations: A 15-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:368e–378e.
Cobb AR, Koudstaal MJ, Bulstrode NW, Lloyd TW, Dunaway DJ. Free groin flap in hemifacial volume reconstruction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51:301–306.
Wang X, Chen J, Zhang Y, Yang Q. Associated balancing surgical treatments of hemifacial microsomia. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:1456–1459.
Poswillo D. Otomandibular deformity: Pathogenesis as a guide to reconstruction. J Maxillofac Surg. 1974;2:64–72.
Grabbe K. The formation of glycocoll in the glyoxylate cycle of various bacteria (in German). Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig. 1965;198:303–308.
Melnick M. The etiology of external ear malformations and its relation to abnormalities of the middle ear, inner ear, and other organ systems. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1980;16:303–331.
Fattah AY, Caro C, Khechoyan DY, Tompson B, Forrest CR, Phillips JH. Cephalometric outcomes of orthognathic surgery in hemifacial microsomia. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25:1734–1739.
Gorlin R, Cohen M, Hennekam RC. Branchial arch and oral-acral disorders. In: Syndromes of the Head and Neck. 2001:4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press;790–798.
Cousley RR. A comparison of two classification systems for hemifacial microsomia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;31:78–82.
Poon CC, Meara JG, Heggie AA. Hemifacial microsomia: Use of the OMENS-Plus classification at the Royal Children’s Hospital of Melbourne. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1011–1018.
Xu S, Zhang Z, Tang X, Yin L, Liu W, Shi L. The influence of gender and laterality on the incidence of hemifacial microsomia. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26:384–387.
Rollnick BR, Kaye CI. Hemifacial microsomia and variants: Pedigree data. Am J Med Genet. 1983;15:233–253.
Rollnick BR, Kaye CI, Nagatoshi K, Hauck W, Martin AO. Oculoauriculovertebral dysplasia and variants: Phenotypic characteristics of 294 patients. Am J Med Genet. 1987;26:361–375.
Fariña R, Valladares S, Torrealba R, Nuñez M, Uribe F. Orthognathic surgery in craniofacial microsomia: Treatment algorithm. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015;3:e294.
Santamaría E, Morales C, Taylor JA, Hay A, Ortiz-Monasterio F. Mandibular microsurgical reconstruction in patients with hemifacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:1839–1849.
McCarthy JG, Katzen JT, Hopper R, Grayson BH. The first decade of mandibular distraction: Lessons we have learned. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:1704–1713.
Walton RL, Beahm EK. Auricular reconstruction for microtia: Part II. Surgical techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:234–249; quiz 250251.
Zim SA. Microtia reconstruction: An update. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;11:275–281.
Hammal Z, Cohn JF, Wallace ER, et al. Facial expressiveness in infants with and without craniofacial microsomia: Preliminary findings. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55:711–720.
MacQuillan A, Vesely M, Harrison D, Grobbelaar A. Reanimation options in patients with hemifacial microsomia and marginal mandibular nerve palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:1962–1963.