Overlap in disease concept of functional esophageal disorders and minor esophageal motility disorders.
endoscopy
functional gastrointestinal disorders
manometry
Journal
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
ISSN: 1440-1746
Titre abrégé: J Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 8607909
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
15
02
2019
revised:
05
04
2019
accepted:
23
04
2019
pubmed:
30
4
2019
medline:
4
8
2020
entrez:
30
4
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Functional gastrointestinal disorders are the most common disorders in gastroenterology and are currently considered as gut-brain interaction disorders with multiple related factors including motility disturbance. However, high-resolution manometry (HRM) had revealed a new disease concept known as minor esophageal motility disorders. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between functional esophageal disorders (FEDs) and minor esophageal motility disorders. Functional esophageal disorders were diagnosed using upper endoscopy, pH monitoring, and HRM, to exclude achalasia, esophago-gastric junction outflow obstruction, and other major esophageal motility disorders. FEDs with or without minor esophageal motility disorders were compared using the Chicago classification. Twelve healthy volunteers also subjected to HRM showed no minor esophageal motility disorders. Of the 40 patients with FEDs, 15 (37.5%) were diagnosed with minor esophageal motility disorders. Characteristics were not different between patients with and without minor esophageal motility disorders (sex: P = 0.609, age: P = 0.054, body mass index: P = 0.137, and presence of psychiatric disorders: P = 0.404). The type and location of symptoms were not related to the comorbidity rate of minor esophageal motility disorders (P = 0.744 and 0.094). No patients with FEDs developed major esophageal motility disorders. Minor esophageal motility disorders were frequently observed in FEDs, but the causal relationship between esophageal symptoms remains unclear. The disease concepts of FEDs and minor esophageal motility disorders are considered to overlap and are both independent of major esophageal motility disorders.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
OBJECTIVE
Functional gastrointestinal disorders are the most common disorders in gastroenterology and are currently considered as gut-brain interaction disorders with multiple related factors including motility disturbance. However, high-resolution manometry (HRM) had revealed a new disease concept known as minor esophageal motility disorders. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between functional esophageal disorders (FEDs) and minor esophageal motility disorders.
METHODS
METHODS
Functional esophageal disorders were diagnosed using upper endoscopy, pH monitoring, and HRM, to exclude achalasia, esophago-gastric junction outflow obstruction, and other major esophageal motility disorders. FEDs with or without minor esophageal motility disorders were compared using the Chicago classification.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twelve healthy volunteers also subjected to HRM showed no minor esophageal motility disorders. Of the 40 patients with FEDs, 15 (37.5%) were diagnosed with minor esophageal motility disorders. Characteristics were not different between patients with and without minor esophageal motility disorders (sex: P = 0.609, age: P = 0.054, body mass index: P = 0.137, and presence of psychiatric disorders: P = 0.404). The type and location of symptoms were not related to the comorbidity rate of minor esophageal motility disorders (P = 0.744 and 0.094). No patients with FEDs developed major esophageal motility disorders.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Minor esophageal motility disorders were frequently observed in FEDs, but the causal relationship between esophageal symptoms remains unclear. The disease concepts of FEDs and minor esophageal motility disorders are considered to overlap and are both independent of major esophageal motility disorders.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1940-1945Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI
ID : 18K15805
Informations de copyright
© 2019 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Drossman DA. Functional gastrointestinal disorders: history, pathophysiology, clinical features and Rome IV. Gastroenterology 2016. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.032.
Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Schwizer W, Smout AJPM. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2012; 24: 57-65.
Sato H, Takahashi K, Mizuno KI et al. Esophageal motility disorders: new perspectives from high-resolution manometry and histopathology. J. Gastroenterol. 2018; 53: 484-493.
Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M et al. The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2015; 27: 160-174.
Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL et al. The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology 1996; 111: 85-92.
Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut 1999; 45: 172-180.
Yamasaki T, Fass R. Reflux hypersensitivity: a new functional esophageal disorder. Jl Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2017; 23: 495-503.
Kuribayashi S, Iwakiri K, Kawada A et al. Variant parameter values-as defined by the Chicago criteria-produced by ManoScan and a new system with Unisensor catheter. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2015; 27: 188-194.
Aziz Q, Fass R, Gyawali CP, Miwa H, Pandolfino JE, Functional ZF. Esophageal disorders. Gastroenterology 2016. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.012.
Bogte A, Bredenoord AJ, Oors J, Siersema PD, Smout AJ. Relationship between esophageal contraction patterns and clearance of swallowed liquid and solid boluses in healthy controls and patients with dysphagia. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2012; 24: e364-e372.
Lazarescu A, Karamanolis G, Aprile L, De Oliveira RB, Dantas R, Sifrim D. Perception of dysphagia: lack of correlation with objective measurements of esophageal function. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2010; 22: 1292-7, e336-7.
Bogte A, Bredenoord AJ, Oors J, Siersema PD, Smout AJ. Sensation of stasis is poorly correlated with impaired esophageal bolus transport. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2014; 26: 538-545.
Xiao Y, Kahrilas PJ, Kwasny MJ et al. High-resolution manometry correlates of ineffective esophageal motility. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2012; 107: 1647-1654.
Fouad YM, Katz PO, Hatlebakk JG, Castell DO. Ineffective esophageal motility: the most common motility abnormality in patients with GERD-associated respiratory symptoms. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1999; 94: 1464-1467.
Ribolsi M, Balestrieri P, Emerenziani S, Guarino MP, Cicala M. Weak peristalsis with large breaks is associated with higher acid exposure and delayed reflux clearance in the supine position in GERD patients. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2014; 109: 46-51.
Roman S, Lin Z, Kwiatek MA, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Weak peristalsis in esophageal pressure topography: classification and association with Dysphagia. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2011; 106: 349-356.
Xiao Y, Kahrilas PJ, Nicodeme F, Lin Z, Roman S, Pandolfino JE. Lack of correlation between HRM metrics and symptoms during the manometric protocol. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2014; 109: 521-526.
Tanaka Y, Ihara E, Nakamura K et al. Clinical characteristics associated with esophageal motility function. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016; 31: 1133-1140.
Loo FD, Dodds WJ, Soergel KH, Arndorfer RC, Helm JF, Hogan WJ. Multipeaked esophageal peristaltic pressure waves in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Gastroenterology 1985; 88: 485-491.
Miwa H, Kondo T, Oshima T, Fukui H, Tomita T, Watari J. Esophageal sensation and esophageal hypersensitivity-overview from bench to bedside. J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2010; 16: 353-362.
Ravi K, Friesen L, Issaka R, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE. Long-term outcomes of patients with normal or minor motor function abnormalities detected by high-resolution esophageal manometry. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015; 13: 1416-1423.
Bredenoord AJ. Minor disorders of esophageal peristalsis: Highly prevalent, minimally relevant? Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015; 13: 1424-1425.
Fornari F, Bravi I, Penagini R, Tack J, Sifrim D. Multiple rapid swallowing: a complementary test during standard oesophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2009; 21: 718-e41.
Weijenborg PW, de Schepper HS, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Effects of antidepressants in patients with functional esophageal disorders or gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015; 13: 251-9 e1.
Lee YY, Wu JCY. Management of patients with functional heartburn. Gastroenterology 2018; 154: 2018-21 e1.