Clarithromycin and endoscopic sinus surgery for adults with chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps: study protocol for the MACRO randomised controlled trial.


Journal

Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Apr 2019
Historique:
received: 27 11 2018
accepted: 21 03 2019
entrez: 1 5 2019
pubmed: 1 5 2019
medline: 18 12 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common source of ill health; 11% of UK adults reported CRS symptoms in a worldwide population study. Guidelines are conflicting regarding whether antibiotics should be included in primary medical management, reflecting the lack of evidence in systematic reviews. Insufficient evidence to inform the role of surgery contributes to a fivefold variation in UK intervention rates. The objective of this trial is to establish the comparative effectiveness of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) or a prolonged course of antibiotics (clarithromycin) in adult patients with CRS in terms of symptomatic improvement and costs to the National Health Service compared with standard medical care (intranasal medication) at 6 months. A three-arm parallel-group trial will be conducted with patients who remain symptomatic after receiving appropriate medical therapy (either in primary or secondary care). They will be randomised to receive: (1) intranasal medication plus ESS, (2) intranasal medication plus clarithromycin (250 mg) or (3) intranasal medication plus a placebo. Intranasal medication (current standard medical care) is defined as a spray or drops of intranasal corticosteroids and saline irrigations. The primary outcome measure is the SNOT-22 questionnaire, which assesses disease-specific health-related quality of life. The study sample size is 600. Principal analyses will be according to the randomised groups irrespective of compliance. The trial will be conducted in at least 16 secondary or tertiary care centres with an internal pilot at six sites for 6 months. The potential cardiovascular side effects of macrolide antibiotics have been recently highlighted. The effectiveness of antibiotics will be established through this trial, which may help to reduce unnecessary usage and potential morbidity. If ESS is shown to be clinically effective and cost-effective, the trial may encourage earlier intervention. In contrast, if it is shown to be ineffective, then there should be a significant reduction in surgery rates. The trial results will feed into the other components of the MACRO research programme to establish best practice for the management of adults with CRS and design the ideal patient pathway across primary and secondary care. ISRCTN36962030 . Registered on 17 October 2018.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common source of ill health; 11% of UK adults reported CRS symptoms in a worldwide population study. Guidelines are conflicting regarding whether antibiotics should be included in primary medical management, reflecting the lack of evidence in systematic reviews. Insufficient evidence to inform the role of surgery contributes to a fivefold variation in UK intervention rates. The objective of this trial is to establish the comparative effectiveness of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) or a prolonged course of antibiotics (clarithromycin) in adult patients with CRS in terms of symptomatic improvement and costs to the National Health Service compared with standard medical care (intranasal medication) at 6 months.
METHODS/DESIGN METHODS
A three-arm parallel-group trial will be conducted with patients who remain symptomatic after receiving appropriate medical therapy (either in primary or secondary care). They will be randomised to receive: (1) intranasal medication plus ESS, (2) intranasal medication plus clarithromycin (250 mg) or (3) intranasal medication plus a placebo. Intranasal medication (current standard medical care) is defined as a spray or drops of intranasal corticosteroids and saline irrigations. The primary outcome measure is the SNOT-22 questionnaire, which assesses disease-specific health-related quality of life. The study sample size is 600. Principal analyses will be according to the randomised groups irrespective of compliance. The trial will be conducted in at least 16 secondary or tertiary care centres with an internal pilot at six sites for 6 months.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
The potential cardiovascular side effects of macrolide antibiotics have been recently highlighted. The effectiveness of antibiotics will be established through this trial, which may help to reduce unnecessary usage and potential morbidity. If ESS is shown to be clinically effective and cost-effective, the trial may encourage earlier intervention. In contrast, if it is shown to be ineffective, then there should be a significant reduction in surgery rates. The trial results will feed into the other components of the MACRO research programme to establish best practice for the management of adults with CRS and design the ideal patient pathway across primary and secondary care.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ISRCTN36962030 . Registered on 17 October 2018.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31036048
doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3314-7
pii: 10.1186/s13063-019-3314-7
pmc: PMC6489242
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Bacterial Agents 0
Clarithromycin H1250JIK0A

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

246

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K006584/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR-RP-011-045
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-0614-20011
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Programme Grants for Applied Research
ID : RP-PG-0614-20011

Investigateurs

Neil Med (N)
Keith Boland (K)
Jane Woods (J)
Teresa Ferreira (T)

Références

Pharmacol Res. 2001 Dec;44(6):451-4
pubmed: 11735349
J Otolaryngol. 2002 Aug;31 Suppl 1:S38-40
pubmed: 12243242
J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jan;45(1):5-14
pubmed: 12553174
Am J Rhinol. 2003 Jan-Feb;17(1):27-32
pubmed: 12693653
Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(17):iii, 1-159
pubmed: 12969541
Laryngoscope. 2004 May;114(5):923-30
pubmed: 15126758
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2004 May;193:3-5
pubmed: 15174752
Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Feb;55(511):114-8
pubmed: 15720932
Laryngoscope. 2006 Feb;116(2):189-93
pubmed: 16467702
Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Oct;31(5):390-8
pubmed: 17014448
Am J Rhinol. 2006 Sep-Oct;20(5):506-19
pubmed: 17063747
Rhinology. 2007 Dec;45(4):259-67
pubmed: 18085018
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Feb;27 Suppl A:61-5
pubmed: 1827103
Laryngoscope. 2009 Dec;119(12):2459-65
pubmed: 19780032
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Oct;34(5):447-54
pubmed: 19793277
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jul;23(3):590-615
pubmed: 20610825
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Nov;143(5):621-5
pubmed: 20974329
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun;40(3):232-7
pubmed: 21518646
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 May 11;(5):CD008233
pubmed: 21563166
Allergy. 2011 Sep;66(9):1216-23
pubmed: 21605125
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2011;73(4):206-11
pubmed: 21757966
Allergy. 2011 Nov;66(11):1457-68
pubmed: 21884529
Rhinology. 2011 Oct;49(4):420-8
pubmed: 21991567
Rhinol Suppl. 2012 Mar;23:3 p preceding table of contents, 1-298
pubmed: 22764607
Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2012;3(1):e8-e12
pubmed: 22852131
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Mar;148(3):366-73
pubmed: 23314162
BMJ. 2013 May 01;346:f2678
pubmed: 23635541
Clin Otolaryngol. 2013 Dec;38(6):474-80
pubmed: 24131818
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014 Mar;14(3):416
pubmed: 24429901
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Jul;4(7):525-32
pubmed: 24610673
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2014 Aug;39(4):411-7
pubmed: 24661290
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 27;4(10):e006245
pubmed: 25348424
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 20;(11):CD006990
pubmed: 25410644
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(12):CD006991
pubmed: 25437000
Rhinology. 2015 Mar;53(1):10-7
pubmed: 25756072
Rhinology. 2015 Mar;53(1):18-24
pubmed: 25756073
Clin Otolaryngol. 2015 Dec;40(6):639-45
pubmed: 25851163
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 29;5(4):e006680
pubmed: 25926143
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Nov 17;66(20):2173-2184
pubmed: 26564594
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Feb;6 Suppl 1:S22-209
pubmed: 26889651
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Jun;6(6):557-67
pubmed: 26970538
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4:CD011991
pubmed: 27113367
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4:CD011994
pubmed: 27113482
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4:CD011992
pubmed: 27115214
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4:CD011993
pubmed: 27115215
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4:CD011995
pubmed: 27115216
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4:CD011996
pubmed: 27115217
Clin Otolaryngol. 2017 Feb;42(1):131-138
pubmed: 27223120
Clin Otolaryngol. 2017 Jun;42(3):637-650
pubmed: 27809411
Trials. 2017 Jan 23;18(1):39
pubmed: 28114954
Drug Saf. 2017 Aug;40(8):663-677
pubmed: 28397186
Rhinology. 2017 Jun 1;55(2):113-119
pubmed: 28434016
Front Immunol. 2018 Mar 13;9:302
pubmed: 29593707
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 19;8(12):e022643
pubmed: 30573482
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 23;9(4):e022644
pubmed: 31015263
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Jul;113(1):104-9
pubmed: 7603703
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1996;525:73-8
pubmed: 8908275

Auteurs

Carl Philpott (C)

Norwich Medical School, Chancellor's Drive, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. C.Philpott@uea.ac.uk.
ENT Department, James Paget University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Great Yarmouth, UK. C.Philpott@uea.ac.uk.

Steffi le Conte (S)

SITU, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

David Beard (D)

SITU, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Jonathan Cook (J)

SITU, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

William Sones (W)

SITU, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Steve Morris (S)

Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.

Caroline S Clarke (CS)

Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.

Mike Thomas (M)

University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Paul Little (P)

University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Jane Vennik (J)

University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Valerie Lund (V)

UCL Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK.

Helen Blackshaw (H)

evidENT, UCL Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK.

Anne Schilder (A)

evidENT, UCL Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK.

Stephen Durham (S)

Faculty of Medicine, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Spiros Denaxas (S)

Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.

James Carpenter (J)

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University College London, London, UK.

James Boardman (J)

Fifth Sense, Sanderum House, 38 Oakley Road, Chinnor, Oxfordshire, OX39 4TW, UK.

Claire Hopkins (C)

ENT Department, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH