Is presumed consent an ethically acceptable way of obtaining organs for transplant?

Presumed consent ethics ethics; clinical ethics; transplantation tissue and organ procurement

Journal

Journal of the Intensive Care Society
ISSN: 1751-1437
Titre abrégé: J Intensive Care Soc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101538668

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2019
Historique:
entrez: 1 5 2019
pubmed: 1 5 2019
medline: 1 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The near-universal acceptance of cadaveric organ donation has been based on the provision of explicit consent by the donor while alive, either in the form of a formal opt-in or informal discussion of wishes with next of kin. Despite the success of transplantation programmes based on explicit consent, the ongoing imbalance between demand and supply of organs for transplantation has prompted calls for more widespread introduction of laws validating presumed consent with facility for opt-out as a means of increasing organ availability. The Department of Health (UK) has recently concluded a consultation on the introduction of such a law for England. This article explores the debate on presumed consent from an ethical point of view and summarises the key arguments on both sides of the ethical divide.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31037100
doi: 10.1177/1751143718777171
pii: 10.1177_1751143718777171
pmc: PMC6475984
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

92-97

Références

BMJ. 2009 Jan 14;338:a3162
pubmed: 19147479
Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Mar;39(3):611-5
pubmed: 11877582
BMJ. 1999 Jul 17;319(7203):141
pubmed: 10406734
J Am Med Assoc. 1956 Jan 28;160(4):277-82
pubmed: 13278189
J Med Ethics. 2010 Feb;36(2):84-7
pubmed: 20133401
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Mar;2(2):300-3
pubmed: 17699428
J Med Ethics. 2018 May;44(5):314-318
pubmed: 29419421
J Med Ethics. 2015 Oct;41(10):832-5
pubmed: 26037283
BMJ. 2018 Feb 15;360:k744
pubmed: 29449221
Transplant Proc. 1992 Oct;24(5):2168-72
pubmed: 1413020
J Med Ethics. 2003 Jun;29(3):147-52
pubmed: 12796433
Transplant Proc. 1995 Apr;27(2):1888-92
pubmed: 7725540
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Jun;27(6):2533-46
pubmed: 22121233
Lancet. 1998 May 30;351(9116):1650-2
pubmed: 9620733
BMJ. 2017 Dec 12;359:j5764
pubmed: 29233812
J Intensive Care Soc. 2018 Feb;19(1):2-3
pubmed: 29456593
J R Soc Med. 2014 Feb;107(2):56-60
pubmed: 24158942
Philosophy. 1975 Jan;50(191):81-7
pubmed: 11664454
N Engl J Med. 1968 Aug 22;279(8):413-9
pubmed: 4874207
Princet J Bioeth. 2000 Spring;3(1):70-80
pubmed: 11936139
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 Oct;93(7):565; author reply 565
pubmed: 22128399
Health Care Anal. 2000;8(3):279-95
pubmed: 11186026
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;108 Suppl 1:i73-9
pubmed: 22194435
J Med Ethics. 2012 Feb;38(2):69-72
pubmed: 21828226
J Med Philos. 2004 Feb;29(1):37-59
pubmed: 15449812

Auteurs

Pradeep Kumar Prabhu (PK)

Department of Anaesthetics, The Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.

Classifications MeSH