Comparing Word Characteristic Effects on Vocabulary of Children with Cochlear Implants.
Journal
Journal of deaf studies and deaf education
ISSN: 1465-7325
Titre abrégé: J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9889915
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2019
01 10 2019
Historique:
received:
20
12
2018
revised:
20
03
2019
accepted:
05
04
2019
pubmed:
1
5
2019
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
1
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Many studies have evaluated overall vocabulary knowledge of children who use cochlear implants, but there has been minimal focus on how word form characteristics affect this knowledge. This study evaluates the effects of neighborhood density and phonotactic probability on the expressive vocabulary of 81 children between five and seven years old (n = 27 cochlear implant users, n = 27 children matched for chronological age, and n = 27 children matched for vocabulary size). Children were asked to name pictures associated with words that have common and rare phonotactic probability and high and sparse neighborhood density. Results indicate that children with cochlear implants, similar to both groups of children with typical hearing, tend to know words with common probability/high density or with rare probability/ sparse density. Patterns of word knowledge for children with cochlear implants mirrored younger children matched for vocabulary size rather than age-matched children with typical hearing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31037301
pii: 5481799
doi: 10.1093/deafed/enz015
pmc: PMC6933531
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
424-434Subventions
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R03 DC015078
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):977-90
pubmed: 19897807
Ear Hear. 2002 Oct;23(5):450-62
pubmed: 12411778
Ear Hear. 2012 Sep-Oct;33(5):561-72
pubmed: 22517185
Ear Hear. 2006 Dec;27(6):628-44
pubmed: 17086075
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2006 Jan;37(1):5-16
pubmed: 16615745
Behav Res Methods. 2010 May;42(2):497-506
pubmed: 20479181
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Aug;53(4):933-49
pubmed: 20543024
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Dec;45(4):1159-67
pubmed: 23307574
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016 Apr;21(2):107-21
pubmed: 26712811
J Child Lang. 2005 Nov;32(4):827-53
pubmed: 16429713
Cogn Psychol. 2007 Dec;55(4):306-53
pubmed: 17367775
J Child Lang. 2014 May;41(3):634-57
pubmed: 23651703
J Child Lang. 2005 Feb;32(1):175-89
pubmed: 15779882
Ear Hear. 2018 Sep/Oct;39(5):980-991
pubmed: 29474219
Ear Hear. 2009 Oct;30(5):541-51
pubmed: 19581807
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2007 Fall;12(4):461-71
pubmed: 17556732
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Jun 1;57(3):1011-25
pubmed: 24686926
J Am Acad Audiol. 2001 May;12(5):233-44
pubmed: 11392435
Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2017 Jan 1;2(9):43-53
pubmed: 34079910
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Jan;53(1):3-15
pubmed: 28621001
Lang Cogn Process. 2011;26(2):191-211
pubmed: 21643455
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Jun;58(3):987-1000
pubmed: 25677929
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Jun;23(6):446-63
pubmed: 22668765
Ear Hear. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):506-18
pubmed: 24992492
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Dec;42(6):1432-43
pubmed: 10599625
Cochlear Implants Int. 2014 Jul;15(4):211-21
pubmed: 23998324
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011 Summer;16(3):289-304
pubmed: 21307357
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Jun;53(3):739-56
pubmed: 20530386
Ear Hear. 2011 Feb;32(1 Suppl):39S-48S
pubmed: 21832889
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015 Jul;20(3):242-51
pubmed: 25802320
Ear Hear. 1995 Oct;16(5):470-81
pubmed: 8654902
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2008 Jan;39(1):3-20
pubmed: 18162644
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2012 Spring;17(2):205-26
pubmed: 22057983
J Mem Lang. 2010 Jul 1;63(1):100-116
pubmed: 20563243
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Dec;44(6):1321-37
pubmed: 11776368
Dev Psychol. 2002 Nov;38(6):934-47
pubmed: 12428705
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Dec;49(6):1175-92
pubmed: 17197489
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):978-90
pubmed: 22581493