Spatial Patterns and Sequential Sampling Plans for Estimating Densities of Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Soybean in the North Central Region of the United States.


Journal

Journal of economic entomology
ISSN: 1938-291X
Titre abrégé: J Econ Entomol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985127R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 08 2019
Historique:
received: 03 12 2018
pubmed: 1 5 2019
medline: 18 12 2019
entrez: 1 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Stink bugs are an emerging threat to soybean (Fabales: Fabaceae) in the North Central Region of the United States. Consequently, region-specific scouting recommendations for stink bugs are needed. The aim of this study was to characterize the spatial pattern and to develop sampling plans to estimate stink bug population density in soybean fields. In 2016 and 2017, 125 fields distributed across nine states were sampled using sweep nets. Regression analyses were used to determine the effects of stink bug species [Chinavia hilaris (Say) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) and Euschistus spp. (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)], life stages (nymphs and adults), and field locations (edge and interior) on spatial pattern as represented by variance-mean relationships. Results showed that stink bugs were aggregated. Sequential sampling plans were developed for each combination of species, life stage, and location and for all the data combined. Results for required sample size showed that an average of 40-42 sample units (sets of 25 sweeps) would be necessary to achieve a precision of 0.25 for stink bug densities commonly encountered across the region. However, based on the observed geographic gradient of stink bug densities, more practical sample sizes (5-10 sample units) may be sufficient in states in the southeastern part of the region, whereas impractical sample sizes (>100 sample units) may be required in the northwestern part of the region. Our findings provide research-based sampling recommendations for estimating densities of these emerging pests in soybean.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31038178
pii: 5481911
doi: 10.1093/jee/toz100
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1732-1740

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Daniela T Pezzini (DT)

Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN.

Christina D DiFonzo (CD)

Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Leasing, MI.

Deborah L Finke (DL)

Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO.

Thomas E Hunt (TE)

Haskell Agricultural Laboratory, Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska, Concord, NE.

Janet J Knodel (JJ)

Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.

Christian H Krupke (CH)

Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

Brian McCornack (B)

Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.

Andrew P Michel (AP)

Department of Entomology, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH.

Roger D Moon (RD)

Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN.

Christopher R Philips (CR)

Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN.

Adam J Varenhorst (AJ)

Department of Agronomy, Horticulture and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD.

Robert J Wright (RJ)

Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.

Robert L Koch (RL)

Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN.

Articles similaires

Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
Humans Emergency Service, Hospital Child Child, Preschool Infant
Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell

Classifications MeSH