Estimating age-specific vaccine effectiveness using data from a large measles outbreak in Berlin, Germany, 2014/15: evidence for waning immunity.
Adolescent
Adult
Age Distribution
Age Factors
Antibodies, Viral
/ blood
Berlin
Child
Child, Preschool
Disease Outbreaks
/ prevention & control
Female
Germany
/ epidemiology
Humans
Immunization Schedule
Male
Measles
/ epidemiology
Measles Vaccine
/ administration & dosage
Measles virus
/ immunology
Retrospective Studies
Vaccination
/ methods
Vaccination Coverage
/ statistics & numerical data
Young Adult
Germany
measles
measles vaccine
monte carlo method
screening method
vaccine effectiveness
waning immunity
Journal
Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin
ISSN: 1560-7917
Titre abrégé: Euro Surveill
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 100887452
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
entrez:
2
5
2019
pubmed:
2
5
2019
medline:
24
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
BackgroundMeasles elimination is based on 95% coverage with two doses of a measles-containing vaccine (MCV2), high vaccine effectiveness (VE) and life-long vaccine-induced immunity. Longitudinal analysis of antibody titres suggests existence of waning immunity, but the relevance at the population-level is unknown.AimWe sought to assess presence of waning immunity by estimating MCV2 VE in different age groups (2-5, 6-15, 16-23, 24-30 and 31-42 years) in Berlin.MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature review on vaccination coverage and applied the screening-method using data from a large measles outbreak (2014/15) in Berlin. Uncertainty in input variables was incorporated by Monte Carlo simulation. In a scenario analysis, we estimated the proportion vaccinated with MCV2 in those 31-42 years using VE of the youngest age group, where natural immunity was deemed negligible.ResultsOf 773 measles cases (median age: 20 years), 40 had received MCV2. Average vaccine coverage per age group varied (32%-88%). Estimated median VE was > 99% (95% credible interval (CrI): 98.6-100) in the three youngest age groups, but lower (90.9%, 95% CrI: 74.1-97.6) in the oldest age group. In the scenario analysis, the estimated proportion vaccinated was 98.8% (95% CrI: 96.5-99.8).ConclusionVE for MCV2 was generally high, but lower in those aged 31-42 years old. The estimated proportion with MCV2 should have led to sufficient herd immunity in those aged 31-42 years old. Thus, lower VE cannot be fully explained by natural immunity, suggesting presence of waning immunity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31039834
doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.17.1800529
pmc: PMC6628761
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
Measles Vaccine
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
PLoS Curr. 2015 Feb 25;7:
pubmed: 25789202
Vaccine. 2019 Jan 7;37(2):219-222
pubmed: 28760612
J Infect Dis. 2003 May 15;187 Suppl 1:S208-16
pubmed: 12721915
Int J Epidemiol. 1993 Aug;22(4):742-6
pubmed: 8225751
Euro Surveill. 2017 Aug 24;22(34):
pubmed: 28857043
J Infect Dis. 2011 Jul;204 Suppl 1:S559-63
pubmed: 21666213
J Infect Dis. 2011 Jul;204 Suppl 1:S133-48
pubmed: 21666154
J Infect Dis. 2004 May 1;189 Suppl 1:S27-35
pubmed: 15106086
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Oct 1;92(10):742-9
pubmed: 25378728
Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;21(5):1014-20
pubmed: 1468838
Euro Surveill. 2018 Sep;23(37):
pubmed: 30229722
J Infect Dis. 2008 Apr 1;197(7):950-6
pubmed: 18419470
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Jul 14;2:16049
pubmed: 27411684
Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Dec 1;150(11):1238-49
pubmed: 10588085
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 May;58(9):1205-10
pubmed: 24585562
Vaccine. 2000 Oct 15;19(4-5):523-9
pubmed: 11027817
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Mar;161(3):294-301
pubmed: 17339511
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007 May-Jun;50(5-6):851-62
pubmed: 17514471
Euro Surveill. 2012 Apr 26;17(17):
pubmed: 22551497
CMAJ. 2011 Jun 14;183(9):1014-20
pubmed: 21576295
Euro Surveill. 2017 Apr 27;22(17):
pubmed: 28488997
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007 Sep;26(9):782-6
pubmed: 17721371