Understanding Follicular Output Rate (FORT) and its Implications for POSEIDON Criteria.
FORT
FSH receptor polymorphism
POSEIDON criteria
controlled ovarian stimulation
follicular output rate
hypo-response
Journal
Frontiers in endocrinology
ISSN: 1664-2392
Titre abrégé: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
30
11
2018
accepted:
29
03
2019
entrez:
2
5
2019
pubmed:
2
5
2019
medline:
2
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The management of low prognosis patients in ART represents a challenge for reproductive specialists. Different profiles and biologic characteristics have been identified among these patients. Indeed, while poor ovarian response can be seen in patients with impaired ovarian reserve, others, identified as hypo-responders, show unexpected poor or suboptimal response to controlled ovarian stimulation despite satisfying ovarian parameters. These hypo-responders are associated during FSH stimulation to slow initial responses in terms of estradiol levels and follicle growth, longer stimulations, and/or greater cumulative FSH doses. Hence, it appears that ovarian sensitivity to gonadotropins differs from a patient to another, and plays a determinant role on ovarian response to stimulation. Although precise mechanisms remain to be elucidated, increasing evidence suggests that ovarian sensitivity to FSH could be influenced by the presence of genetic mutations or single nucleotide polymorphisms of gonadotropins and their receptors. Evaluating ovarian sensitivity to FSH therefore appears as a key element to improve IVF success rates in these low prognosis patients and open new treatment perspectives. Since the traditional ovarian markers currently used are not sufficient to accurately reflect ovarian response to FSH, a tool to assess ovarian sensitivity to gonadotropin stimulation was required. The present review aims to present Follicular Output Rate (FORT) as an efficient quantitative and qualitative marker of ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropins, discuss the underlying mechanisms of impaired sensitivity to FSH and the possible FORT implications for Poseidon criteria.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31040828
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00246
pmc: PMC6476927
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
246Références
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Sep;85(9):3365-9
pubmed: 10999835
Fertil Steril. 2002 Feb;77(2):357-62
pubmed: 11821097
Fertil Steril. 2002 Mar;77(3):468-71
pubmed: 11872196
Fertil Steril. 2002 Jul;78(1):40-6
pubmed: 12095488
Hum Reprod. 2002 Dec;17(12):3065-71
pubmed: 12456604
Hum Reprod. 2003 Feb;18(2):323-7
pubmed: 12571168
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Dec;88(12):5957-62
pubmed: 14671196
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2004 May;60(5):637-43
pubmed: 15104569
Reprod Biomed Online. 2004 Jun;8(6):635-43
pubmed: 15169576
Fertil Steril. 2004 Nov;82(5):1323-9
pubmed: 15533354
Fertil Steril. 2004 Dec;82(6):1521-6
pubmed: 15589853
Hum Reprod. 2005 Apr;20(4):923-7
pubmed: 15640257
Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005 Jul;15(7):451-6
pubmed: 15970792
Fertil Steril. 2005 Jul;84(1):167-73
pubmed: 16009173
Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Feb;12(2):221-33
pubmed: 16478591
Hum Reprod. 2007 Mar;22(3):766-71
pubmed: 17071823
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007 Jan;24(1):29-36
pubmed: 17165151
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007 Sep;24(9):387-94
pubmed: 17597392
Fertil Steril. 2009 Mar;91(3):705-14
pubmed: 18321493
Fertil Steril. 2009 Jan;91(1):148-56
pubmed: 18455166
Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Jan;18(1):9-14
pubmed: 19146763
Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Apr;18(4):509-15
pubmed: 19400992
Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):1031-6
pubmed: 21067717
Hum Reprod. 2011 Mar;26(3):671-7
pubmed: 21177311
Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24
pubmed: 21505041
Mol Genet Metab. 2011 Aug;103(4):388-93
pubmed: 21546300
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Sep;96(9):2805-12
pubmed: 21752882
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011 Aug 09;9:112
pubmed: 21824441
Fertil Steril. 2011 Nov;96(5):1058-61.e7
pubmed: 22036048
Hum Reprod. 2012 Apr;27(4):1066-72
pubmed: 22279090
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012 Jul;29(7):657-63
pubmed: 22527896
Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):26-36
pubmed: 23188168
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013 Jun 01;11:51
pubmed: 23725475
Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Aug;27(2):147-53
pubmed: 23768619
Hum Reprod. 2014 Sep;29(9):1835-8
pubmed: 24916434
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Jun;30(6):581-92
pubmed: 25892496
Mol Med Rep. 2015 Sep;12(3):4219-4229
pubmed: 26059981
Biomed Environ Sci. 2015 Sep;28(9):696-700
pubmed: 26464260
Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):370-6
pubmed: 26724797
Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Apr;22(3):306-19
pubmed: 26843539
Reprod Sci. 2016 Aug;23(8):1103-8
pubmed: 26902430
Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1452-3
pubmed: 26921622
Int J Fertil Steril. 2016 Jul-Sep;10(2):169-74
pubmed: 27441049
F1000Res. 2016 Dec 23;5:2911
pubmed: 28232864
Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Jun;34(6):598-604
pubmed: 28341386
Hum Reprod Update. 2018 Sep 1;24(5):599-614
pubmed: 29924306
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Aug 17;9:461
pubmed: 30174650
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018 Oct 17;9:589
pubmed: 30386293
Obstet Gynecol. 1987 May;69(5):800-6
pubmed: 3106871
Endocr Rev. 1996 Apr;17(2):121-55
pubmed: 8706629