Training to improve resilience and coping to monitor PTSD in rescue workers.
Coping
Earthquake
Rescue
Resilience
Journal
Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene
ISSN: 2421-4248
Titre abrégé: J Prev Med Hyg
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 9214440
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
13
12
2018
accepted:
07
02
2019
entrez:
2
5
2019
pubmed:
2
5
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Few studies focus on the role training has on rescue workers who are active as volunteers or actual workers in emergency situations such as an earthquake. In October 2016, a strong earthquake hit Central Italy and in particular the province of Macerata in the Marche region. Lots of rescuers were called to deal with the emergency. The aim of this study was, therefore, to examine their preparation, studying resilience and coping strategies, as these qualities can protect against complications brought on by traumatic situations (post traumatic stress disorder). An observational study on 70 rescue workers who active in the area affected by the disaster within the province of Macerata was carried out. The questionnaire proposed by the Coping Inventory for Stressful situations (CISS) was used, while individual resilience levels were measured with the Resilience Scale. Both methods were employed in two separate interviews conducted before and after their intervention in the disaster area. To verify a possible difference between the resilience and coping values before and after the activity of rescue effort, the paired Student t test was applied. The sample showed medium to high levels of coping (91.6%) and resilience (89.6%) were present in both interviews and not significant statistical differences was observed for the resilience (among females t = 1.63, p-value = 0.179, and among males (t = -0.76; p-value = 0.487). In contrast, CISS scores before and after the rescue effort showed significant statistical differences both among females (t = 4.81; p-value = 0.009) and males (t = 10.06; p-value = 0.001).Some areas relative to coping mechanisms, such as social avoidance and distraction are preferred by women, while men prefer avoidance and task-oriented activity. Results for resilience show a slight difference for perseverance in men. The ability to use mechanisms of self-preservation like coping and resilience helps rescue workers to better respond in emergency situations. Surely one of the most appropriate ways to reach this result is provided by their preparation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Few studies focus on the role training has on rescue workers who are active as volunteers or actual workers in emergency situations such as an earthquake. In October 2016, a strong earthquake hit Central Italy and in particular the province of Macerata in the Marche region. Lots of rescuers were called to deal with the emergency. The aim of this study was, therefore, to examine their preparation, studying resilience and coping strategies, as these qualities can protect against complications brought on by traumatic situations (post traumatic stress disorder).
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
An observational study on 70 rescue workers who active in the area affected by the disaster within the province of Macerata was carried out.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
The questionnaire proposed by the Coping Inventory for Stressful situations (CISS) was used, while individual resilience levels were measured with the Resilience Scale. Both methods were employed in two separate interviews conducted before and after their intervention in the disaster area. To verify a possible difference between the resilience and coping values before and after the activity of rescue effort, the paired Student t test was applied.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The sample showed medium to high levels of coping (91.6%) and resilience (89.6%) were present in both interviews and not significant statistical differences was observed for the resilience (among females t = 1.63, p-value = 0.179, and among males (t = -0.76; p-value = 0.487). In contrast, CISS scores before and after the rescue effort showed significant statistical differences both among females (t = 4.81; p-value = 0.009) and males (t = 10.06; p-value = 0.001).Some areas relative to coping mechanisms, such as social avoidance and distraction are preferred by women, while men prefer avoidance and task-oriented activity. Results for resilience show a slight difference for perseverance in men.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The ability to use mechanisms of self-preservation like coping and resilience helps rescue workers to better respond in emergency situations. Surely one of the most appropriate ways to reach this result is provided by their preparation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31041412
doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.1.1134
pmc: PMC6477563
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
E58-E63Références
Disasters. 2003 Dec;27(4):336-50
pubmed: 14725091
J Occup Health. 2004 Nov;46(6):497-9
pubmed: 15613775
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009 May;44(5):393-7
pubmed: 18836882
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2009 Jun;153(2):163-8
pubmed: 19771144
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2011 Jun;51(2):299-304
pubmed: 21681166
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;47(6):1001-11
pubmed: 21681455
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2011 Sep-Oct;57(5):523-8
pubmed: 22012285
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2012 Jun;18(2):299-302
pubmed: 22065198
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;10(4):186-91
pubmed: 22819258
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2013;49(1):42-9
pubmed: 23535129
Int Marit Health. 2013;64(3):160-7
pubmed: 24072544
Fukushima J Med Sci. 2014;60(1):57-67
pubmed: 25030715
Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2014;56(6):245-58
pubmed: 25242518
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 09;11(6):e0156536
pubmed: 27280520
Saudi Med J. 2016 Jul;37(7):778-82
pubmed: 27381539
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017 Feb;11(1):31-38
pubmed: 27460161
Recenti Prog Med. 2016 Sep;107(9):465-471
pubmed: 27727254
Ceska Slov Farm. 2016 Winter;65(6):216-220
pubmed: 28079386
Acta Biomed. 2017 Apr 28;88(1):91-94
pubmed: 28467341
Mil Med. 2017 Sep;182(9):e1849-e1855
pubmed: 28885946
Acta Biomed. 2017 Oct 23;88(3):352-359
pubmed: 29083342
Ann Ig. 2018 Mar-Apr;30(2):86-103
pubmed: 29465146
Ann Ig. 2018 Mar-Apr;30(2):162-172
pubmed: 29465153
Ann Ig. 2018 Mar-Apr;30(2):173-179
pubmed: 29465154
Acta Biomed. 2018 Mar 27;89(1):87-92
pubmed: 29633748
Acta Biomed. 2018 Mar 27;89(1):93-98
pubmed: 29633749
J Prev Med Hyg. 2018 Mar 30;59(1):E75-E79
pubmed: 29938241
J Prev Med Hyg. 2018 Mar 30;59(1):E80-E87
pubmed: 29938242
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018 Jul 27;:1-10
pubmed: 30049291
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996 Oct;53(10):913-9
pubmed: 8857868
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998 Sep;186(9):574-7
pubmed: 9741564