Flow disruptions in robotic-assisted abdominal sacrocolpopexy: does robotic surgery introduce unforeseen challenges for gynecologic surgeons?
Da Vinci system
Flow disruptions
Human factors research
Robotic surgical procedures
Sacrocolpopexy
Journal
International urogynecology journal
ISSN: 1433-3023
Titre abrégé: Int Urogynecol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101567041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
07
12
2018
accepted:
13
03
2019
pubmed:
2
5
2019
medline:
21
5
2020
entrez:
2
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to apply a human factors research approach to identify flow disruptions, deviations in the optimal course of care, in robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy procedures with the ultimate goal of developing system interventions to improve the safety and efficiency of robotic surgery. Twenty-four robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy procedures were observed for flow disruptions. Surgeries were divided into four phases: (1) patient arrival and induction of anesthesia; (2) port placement and robot docking; (3) console time; (4) undocking of robot, incision closure, and patient exiting the OR. Flow disruptions were observed at a rate of 10.9 ± 5.1 per hour. The most frequently observed flow disruptions involved training issues (2.8 ± 2.4 flow disruptions per hour), equipment (2.2 ± 1.6 flow disruptions per hour), and poor coordination (2.0 ± 1.3 flow disruptions per hour). The rate of flow disruptions was highest in phase 2 (19.2 ± 14.4 flow disruptions per hour). Cases with more experienced surgeons involved shorter console times by 1.5 h (95% CI: 0.1, 3.0, p = 0.033) and 1.8 fewer (95% CI: 1.2, 2.6, p = 0.001) flow disruptions per hour. Surgeries were 1 h shorter on average (95% CI: 0.1, 1.9, p = 0.034) in cases in which the patient was > 65 years old. Da Vinci S console times were 0.8 h longer (95% CI: 0.01, 1.5, p = 0.047) than Si. Flow disruptions in robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy surgery occur about every 6 min. Flow disruption rates are highest during the most complex portions of the surgery. More experienced surgeons have lower flow disruption rates and operate more quickly.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31041500
doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03929-6
pii: 10.1007/s00192-019-03929-6
pmc: PMC6821560
mid: NIHMS1027883
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2177-2182Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R03 EB017447
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : T35 AG026736
Pays : United States
Organisme : UCLA Medical Student Training in Aging Research Program-the National Institute on Aging
ID : T35AG026736
Pays : International
Organisme : National Institute of Biomedical Imaging & Biomedical Engineering Award
ID : R03EB017447
Pays : International
Références
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 1:i50-8
pubmed: 17142610
Surgery. 2007 Jul;142(1):102-10
pubmed: 17630006
JAMA Surg. 2014 Sep;149(9):962-8
pubmed: 25103360
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):68-73
pubmed: 17479324
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Apr;18(2):109-15
pubmed: 19342524
Can J Urol. 2017 Jun;24(3):8814-8821
pubmed: 28646936
World J Surg. 2010 Feb;34(2):353-61
pubmed: 20012288
Appl Ergon. 2010 Sep;41(5):701-12
pubmed: 20202623
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3749-61
pubmed: 26675938
Ergonomics. 2006 Apr 15-May 15;49(5-6):567-88
pubmed: 16717010
Ann Surg. 2008 Apr;247(4):699-706
pubmed: 18362635
BJU Int. 2010 Jun;105(12):1710-3
pubmed: 19874297
JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):689-98
pubmed: 23423414
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;(8):CD003677
pubmed: 26264829
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Oct;21(10):807-9
pubmed: 23015394