Extensive Histological Sampling following Focal Therapy of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound.
Aged
Biopsy, Large-Core Needle
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Organ Sparing Treatments
/ adverse effects
Organs at Risk
/ radiation effects
Patient Selection
Penile Erection
/ radiation effects
Prospective Studies
Prostate
/ diagnostic imaging
Prostate-Specific Antigen
/ blood
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ blood
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonic Therapy
/ adverse effects
Urinary Incontinence
/ epidemiology
biopsy
high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation
patient reported outcome measures
prostate-specific antigen
prostatic neoplasms
Journal
The Journal of urology
ISSN: 1527-3792
Titre abrégé: J Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376374
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
2
5
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
2
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Clinically significant, localized prostate cancer is currently treated with whole gland therapy. This approach is effective but associated with genitourinary and rectal side effects. Focal therapy of prostate cancer has been proposed as an alternative. The aim of this study was to determine the oncologic and functional outcomes of focal high intensity focused ultrasound therapy of prostate cancer. In this single center, prospective study 75 men were treated between April 2014 and April 2018. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy were performed to localize prostate cancer, followed by focal ablation with high intensity focused ultrasound. The study primary end point was the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, defined as Gleason score 7 or greater, at 6-month followup transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy. Genitourinary side effects were of secondary interest. Median patient age was 67 years (IQR 60-71) and median prostate specific antigen was 5.87 ng/ml (IQR 4.65-7.44). There were 5 low risk (6.7%) and 70 intermediate risk (93.3%) cancers. Clinically significant prostate cancer was detected in 41% of the men (95% CI 30.3-53.0) who underwent biopsy at 6 months and the median number of sampled cores was 44 (IQR 36-44). Prostate specific antigen (OR 1.17, IQR 0.49-2.85, p=0.71) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (14.3% sensitivity, IQR 6.7-31.5) performed poorly to predict positive biopsies. Pad-free continence and erection sufficient for penetration were preserved in 63 of 64 (98.4%) and 31 of 45 patients (68.9%), respectively. Focal therapy with high intensity focused ultrasound leads to a low rate of genitourinary side effects. Followup biopsy of treated and untreated prostates remains the only modality to adequately select men in need of early salvage treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31042109
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000298
doi:
Substances chimiques
Prostate-Specific Antigen
EC 3.4.21.77
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM