Minimally invasive evacuation of spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage by transcranial neuroendoscopic approach.
minimally invasive surgery
supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage
transcranial neuroendoscopic approach
Journal
Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment
ISSN: 1176-6328
Titre abrégé: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101240304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
entrez:
3
5
2019
pubmed:
3
5
2019
medline:
3
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (SSICH) is one of the deadliest diseases, and neuroendoscopic surgery (NE) is a minimally invasive and promising treatment that might improve the functional recovery of patients. This study analyzed patient's experience with this treatment in terms of safety, efficacy, and surgical technique. Forty-two patients with SSICHs treated by transcranial neuroendoscopic approach were retrospectively reviewed from June 2016 to July 2018 in our department. Patients were classified into four groups according to the main location of the hematoma on CT scans: Group A (basal ganglia hemorrhage), Group B (subcortical hemorrhage), Group C (thalamic hemorrhage), and Group D (intraventricular hemorrhage [IVH]). The clinical data were collected, and the outcomes were analyzed. All procedures were successfully completed, and no patient died in the perioperative period. The average hematoma evacuation rate was 90.1%, and the highest hematoma evacuation rate was achieved in Group B which was 92.7%. No severe complications occurred, and the average GCS score improvement was 4.0 at discharge. These data suggest that evacuation hemorrhage by neuroendoscopy might be an effective and safe approach for SSICH. For better efficiency of this treatment, some details needed to be emphasized, such as setting up a good working channel, using of suction and bipolar forceps accurately.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31043783
doi: 10.2147/NDT.S195275
pii: ndt-15-919
pmc: PMC6469739
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
919-925Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
J Neurosurg. 2000 Jun;92(6):1053-5
pubmed: 10839271
Stroke. 2003 Nov;34(11):2593-7
pubmed: 14563963
J Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jan-Feb;20(1):34-42
pubmed: 15665258
Lancet. 2005 Jan 29-Feb 4;365(9457):387-97
pubmed: 15680453
Surg Neurol. 2006 Jun;65(6):547-55; discussion 555-6
pubmed: 16720167
Lancet Neurol. 2008 May;7(5):391-9
pubmed: 18396107
Stroke. 2008 Aug;39(8):2304-9
pubmed: 18556582
Haemophilia. 2008 Sep;14(5):952-5
pubmed: 18637845
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Feb;9(2):167-76
pubmed: 20056489
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011 May-Jun;20(3):208-13
pubmed: 20621516
World Neurosurg. 2011 Feb;75(2):206-8
pubmed: 21492714
World Neurosurg. 2012 Dec;78(6):640-5
pubmed: 22120557
World Neurosurg. 2013 Feb;79(2 Suppl):S17.e1-7
pubmed: 22381838
Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):397-408
pubmed: 23726393
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:898762
pubmed: 24949476
J Chin Med Assoc. 2015 Feb;78(2):101-7
pubmed: 25467795
Stroke. 2015 Jul;46(7):2032-60
pubmed: 26022637
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Nov;22(11):1727-32
pubmed: 26238692
J Neurosurg. 1989 May;70(5):755-8
pubmed: 2651586
World Neurosurg. 2016 Oct;94:268-272
pubmed: 27423197
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 May;39:35-38
pubmed: 28258905
Neurol India. 2017 Jul-Aug;65(4):752-758
pubmed: 28681745
J Neurosurg. 1989 Apr;70(4):530-5
pubmed: 2926492
Acta Neurol Scand. 1997 Feb;95(2):103-10
pubmed: 9059730
Neurosurgery. 1998 Feb;42(2):219-24; discussion 224-5
pubmed: 9482171
Neurosurgery. 1998 Feb;42(2):226-31; discussion 231-2
pubmed: 9482172
Neurology. 1998 Nov;51(5):1359-63
pubmed: 9818860