Clinical experience with 12-month follow-up in patients after implantation of a novel long-tapered sirolimus drug-eluting stent.
coronary artery disease
drug-eluting stent
long coronary lesion
long-tapered stent
Journal
Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology
ISSN: 1734-9338
Titre abrégé: Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101272671
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
15
12
2018
accepted:
07
01
2019
entrez:
3
5
2019
pubmed:
3
5
2019
medline:
3
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Long lesions contribute to a significant number of percutaneous coronary interventions. To assess the efficacy and safety of a novel long-tapered drug-eluting stent (DES) at a 12-month follow-up (FU) in patients with long coronary atherosclerotic lesions. A prospective clinical cohort study was conducted in 32 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using a BioMime Morph tapered stent (Meril Life Sciences, India). The patients were followed for 3, 6, and 12 months. The safety endpoints were death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and MACE and/or major bleeding. Mean lesion length was 48 mm (range: 35-70 mm) measured via quantitative coronary analysis (QCA). In most cases, the target lesion was located in the LAD (68.75%). A GuideLiner catheter (Vascular Solutions Inc., MN, USA) was used in 12.5% of procedures; buddy-wire technique in 9.4% of cases. Bifurcation lesions were treated in 40.6% of cases. Additional stent implantation was needed in 56% of the procedures (25% of cases due to proximal or distal dissection, or due to insufficient stent length in 31% of cases). On 12-month FU we observed 1 TLR (3.1%), 1 TVR (3.1%), and 1 non-cardiovascular death. The long sirolimus-eluting stent with tapered structure was characterized by good deliverability in long coronary lesions, although in some cases "buddy wire" or extension microcatheter use was necessary. Follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months showed no significant major adverse cardiovascular events related to the device.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31043984
doi: 10.5114/aic.2019.83648
pii: 36063
pmc: PMC6488840
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
46-51Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Apr 1;93(7):826-9
pubmed: 15050483
Am Heart J. 2005 Nov;150(5):994-9
pubmed: 16290984
Circ J. 2008 Mar;72(3):463-8
pubmed: 18296847
Int J Cardiol. 2009 May 15;134(2):231-7
pubmed: 18582971
Ann Biomed Eng. 2008 Dec;36(12):2042-50
pubmed: 18846425
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Mar 23;55(12):1178-88
pubmed: 20298923
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Aug 1;110(3):350-5
pubmed: 22560770
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Oct;46(4):517-92
pubmed: 25173601
Eur Heart J. 2016 Aug 1;37(29):2315-2381
pubmed: 27222591
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;67(2):321-8
pubmed: 27226191
Kardiol Pol. 2017;75(1):78
pubmed: 28124789
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):OD06-OD07
pubmed: 28273994
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2017;13(1):88-89
pubmed: 28344627
EuroIntervention. 2018 Jan 20;13(13):1591-1594
pubmed: 28870879
Int J Cardiol. 2018 May 15;259:26-30
pubmed: 29579606