The role of urodynamics in the management of female stress urinary incontinence.
anti-incontinence surgery
clinical examination
mid-urethral sling
office evaluation
stress urinary incontinence
urodynamics/cystometry/pressure flow studies
Journal
Neurourology and urodynamics
ISSN: 1520-6777
Titre abrégé: Neurourol Urodyn
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8303326
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
29
06
2018
accepted:
30
09
2018
pubmed:
3
5
2019
medline:
19
5
2020
entrez:
3
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The role of urodynamic study (UDS) in the management of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is one of the most controversial and debated topic in urogynecology. Here, we aimed to systematically assess the most relevant available evidence on urodynamics' value in the management of women with stress urinary incontinence. A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement was performed in May 2018. Only randomized clinical trials, prospective studies, or retrospective studies articles evaluating the use of urodynamic studies in women with stress urinary incontinence were included. After screening a total of 3055 records, 39 studies published from 1996 to 2018 were included. In an uncomplicated population of women with SUI, it is not demonstrated that preoperative urodynamic evaluation can improve the outcome of continence surgery; however, UDS provides additional information regarding lower urinary tract function that could guide the physician to make the right therapeutic choice. UDS should be considered mandatory before surgery in complicated patients, but its use should also be evaluated in index patients when the results may help counseling and management of these women.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S42-S50Informations de copyright
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman H, et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1987-1997.
Ward RM, Hampton BS, Blume JD, et al. The impact of multichannel urodynamics upon treatment recommendations for female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:1235-1241.
Zimmern P, Litman H, Nager C, et al. Pre-operative urodynamics in women with stress urinary incontinence increases physician confidence, but does not improve outcomes. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33:302-306.
Khan MS, Chaliha C, Leskova L, et al. The relationship between urinary symptom questionnaires and urodynamic diagnoses: an analysis of two methods of questionnaire administration. BJOG. 2004;111:468-474.
Serati M, Salvatore S, Siesto G, et al. Urinary symptoms and urodynamic findings in women with pelvic organ prolapse: is there a correlation? Results of an artificial neural network analysis. Eur Urol. 2011;60:253-260.
Patel AK, Chapple CR. Urodynamics in the management of female stress incontinence-which test and when? Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18:359-364.
Guerette NL, Bena JF, Davila GW. Transobturator slings for stress incontinence: using urodynamic parameters to predict outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:97-102.
Salvatore S, Serati M, Khullar V, et al. Opening vesical pressure: a new test to discriminate urethral sphincter deficiency? Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18:1435-1438.
Serati M, Cattoni E, Siesto G, et al. Urodynamic evaluation: can it prevent the need for surgical intervention in women with apparent pure stress urinary incontinence? BJU Int. 2013;112:E344-E350.
Sirls LT, Richter HE, Litman HJ, et al. The effect of urodynamic testing on clinical diagnosis, treatment plan and outcomes in women undergoing stress urinary incontinence surgery. J Urol. 2013;189:204-209.
van Leijsen SA, Kluivers KB, Mol BW, et al. Can preoperative urodynamic investigation be omitted in women with stress urinary incontinence? A noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31:1118-1123.
van Leijsen SA, Mengerink BB, Kluivers KB. Urodynamics before stress urinary incontinence surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;26:398-403.
van Leijsen SA, Kluivers KB, Mol BW, et al. Value of urodynamics before stress urinary incontinence surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:999-1008.
Finazzi-Agrò E, Serati M, Salvatore S, Del Popolo G. Comments on “A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery” From the Italian Society of Urodynamics. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32:301-302.
Serati M, Topazio L, Bogani G, et al. Urodynamics useless before surgery for female stress urinary incontinence: are you sure? Results from a multicenter single nation database. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:809-812.
Salin A, Conquy S, Elie C, et al. Identification of risk factors for voiding dysfunction following TVT placement. Eur Urol. 2007;51:782-787.
Topazio L, Frey J, Iacovelli V, Perugia C, Vespasiani G, Finazzi Agrò E. Prevalence of ‘complicated’ stress urinary incontinence in female patients: can urodynamics provide more information in such patients? Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1333-1339.
Digesu GA, Hendricken C, Fernando R, et al. Do women with pure stress urinary incontinence need urodynamics? Urology. 2009;74:278-281.
Giarenis I, Cardozo L. What is the value of urodynamic studies before stress incontinence surgery? JBJOG. 2013;120:130-132.
Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al. Three year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in women with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:321-327.
Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2066-2076.
Houwert RM, Venema PL, Aquarius AE, Bruinse HW, Roovers JP, Vervest HA. Risk factors for failure of retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:202.e1-202.e8.
Gamble TL, Botros SM, Beaumont JL, et al. Predictors of persistent detrusor overactivity after transvaginal sling procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:696.e1-696.e7.
Lee JK, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Lim YN, Polyakov A, Stav K. Persistence of urgency and urge urinary incontinence in women with mixed urinary symptoms after midurethral slings: a multivariate analysis. BJOG. 2011;118:798-805.
Agarwal A, Rathi S, Patnaik P, et al. Does preoperative urodynamic testing improve surgical outcomes in patients undergoing the transobturator tape procedure for stress urinary incontinence? A prospective randomized trial. Korean J Urol. 2014;55:821-827.
Dmochowski R, Athanasiou S, Reid F, et al. Recommendation of the International Scientific Committee: surgery for urinary incontinence in women. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. 5th International Consultation on Incontinence. Paris, France: Health Publications; 2013.
Lucas MG, Bedretdinova D, Bosch JL, et al. Guidelines on Urinary Incontinence. European Association of Urology 2014, Available at: http://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/20-Urinary-Incontinence_LR.pdf Accessed June 2015.
Kobashi KC, Albo ME, Dmochowski RR, et al. Surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2017;198:875-883.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Urinary Incontinence in Women: The Management of Urinary Incontinence in Women. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health, commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. London: Royal College of Obstretricians and Gynaecologists; 2013. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg171/resources/cg171-urinary-incontinence-in-women-full-guideline3 Accessed June 2015.
Committee Opinion No. 603: Evaluation of uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence in women before surgical treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:1403-1407.
Medina CA, Costantini E, Petri E, et al. Evaluation and surgery for stress urinary incontinence: a FIGO working group report. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:518-528.
Homer T, Shen J, Vale L, et al. Invasive urodynamic testing prior to surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence in women: cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses in the context of a mixed methods feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018;4:67.
Coskun B, Lavelle RS, Alhalabi F, Lemack G, Zimmern PE. Urodynamics for incontinence after midurethral sling removal. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:939-943.
Alperin M, Abrahams-Gessel S, Wakamatsu MM. Development of de novo urge incontinence in women post sling: the role of preoperative urodynamics in assessing the risk. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27:407-411.
Clarke B. The role of urodynamic assessment in the diagnosis of lower urinary tract disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1997;8:196-199.
Norton P, Nager CW, Brubaker L, et al. The cost of preoperative urodynamics: a secondary analysis of the ValUE trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:81-84.
Matharu G, Donaldson MM, McGrother CW, Matthews RJ. Relationship between urinary symptoms reported in a postal questionnaire and urodynamic diagnosis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24:100-105.
Khan MS, Chaliha C, Leskova L, et al. The relationship between urinary symptom questionnaires and urodynamic diagnoses: an analysis of two methods of questionnaire administration. BJOG. 2004;111:468-474.
Duggan P. Urodynamic diagnoses and quality of life in women presenting for evaluation of urinary incontinence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;51:416-420.
Weber AM, Taylor RJ, Wei JT, et al. The cost-effectiveness of preoperative testing (basic office assessment vs. urodynamics) for stress urinary incontinence in women. BJU Int. 2002;89:356-363.
Weber AM, Walters MD. Cost-effectiveness of urodynamic testing before surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1338-1346. discussion 1346-1347.
Nager CW, Albo ME, Fitzgerald MP, et al. Reference urodynamic values for stress incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:333-340.
Nager CW, FitzGerald M, Kraus SR, et al. Urodynamic measures do not predict stress continence outcomes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence in selected women. J Urol. 2008;179:1470-1474.
Vij M, Dua A, Freeman RM. Should maximal urethral closure pressure be performed before midurethral sling surgery for stress incontinence? A time to revisit. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1491-1495.
Chai TC, Huang L, Kenton K, et al. Association of baseline urodynamic measures of urethral function with clinical, demographic, and other urodynamic variables in women prior to undergoing midurethral sling surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31:496-501.
Nager CW, Kraus SR, Kenton K, et al. Urodynamics, the supine empty bladder stress test, and incontinence severity. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:1306-1311.
Nitti VW, Combs AJ. Correlation of Valsalva leak point pressure with subjective degree of stress urinary incontinence in women. J Urol. 1996;155:281-285.
Sinha D, Nallaswamy V, Arunkalaivanan AS. Value of leak point pressure study in women with incontinence. J Urol. 2006;176:186-188.
Jeong SJ, Kim HJ, Lee BK, et al. Women with pure stress urinary incontinence symptoms assessed by the initial standard evaluation including measurement of post-void residual volume and a stress test: are urodynamic studies still needed? Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31:508-512.
Weidner AC, Myers ER, Visco AG, Cundiff GW, Bump RC. Which women with stress incontinence require urodynamic evaluation? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:20-27.
Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Sethna F, Salvatore S. Preoperative pressure-flow studies: useful variables to predict the outcome of continence surgery. BJU Int. 2004;94:1296-1299.
Rodríguez LV, de Almeida F, Dorey F, Raz S. Does Valsalva leak point pressure predict outcome after the distal urethral polypropylene sling? Role of urodynamics in the sling era. J Urol. 2004;172:210-214.
Holtedahl K, Verelst M, Schiefloe A, Hunskaar S. Usefulness of urodynamic examination in female urinary incontinence-lessons from a population-based, randomized, controlled study of conservative treatment. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2000;34:169-174.