Evidence Types and Trends in Tropical Forest Conservation Literature.

certification community forest management conservation effectiveness evidence-based conservation payments for ecosystem services protected areas

Journal

Trends in ecology & evolution
ISSN: 1872-8383
Titre abrégé: Trends Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8805125

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2019
Historique:
received: 15 01 2019
revised: 13 03 2019
accepted: 18 03 2019
pubmed: 3 5 2019
medline: 18 12 2019
entrez: 4 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To improve the likelihood of conservation success, donors, policy makers, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and researchers are increasingly interested in making conservation decisions based on scientific evidence. A major challenge in doing so has been the wide variability in the methodological rigor of existing studies. We present a simple framework to classify different types of conservation evidence, which can be used to understand the strengths, weaknesses, and biases in the conservation effectiveness literature. We then apply this framework to evaluate the evidence for the efficacy of four important strategies in tropical forest conservation. Even though there has been an increase in methodologically rigorous studies over time, countries that are globally important in terms of their biodiversity are still heavily under-represented by any type of conservation effectiveness evidence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31047718
pii: S0169-5347(19)30082-5
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.03.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

669-679

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Z Burivalova (Z)

Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA; Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology and the Nelson Institute of Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: zuzanab@princeton.edu.

D Miteva (D)

Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

N Salafsky (N)

Foundations of Success, 4109 Maryland Avenue, Bethesda, MD, USA.

R A Butler (RA)

Mongabay.com, P.O. Box 0291, Menlo Park, CA 94026, USA.

D S Wilcove (DS)

Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Articles similaires

Lakes Salinity Archaea Bacteria Microbiota
Rivers Turkey Biodiversity Environmental Monitoring Animals
1.00
Iran Environmental Monitoring Seasons Ecosystem Forests

Insect diversity estimation in polarimetric lidar.

Dolores Bernenko, Meng Li, Hampus Månefjord et al.
1.00
Animals Biodiversity Insecta Algorithms Cluster Analysis

Classifications MeSH