Assessment of pressure pain thresholds in collisions with collaborative robots.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
20
11
2018
accepted:
02
04
2019
entrez:
4
5
2019
pubmed:
3
5
2019
medline:
11
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In recent years, safety issues surrounding robots have increased in importance, as more robots are in close contact with humans, both in industrial fields and elsewhere. Safety standards for industrial robots operating in specific spaces have been established, but no such standards have been specified for collaborative and service robots. To establish safety standards for such robots, we assessed pressure pain thresholds for collisions between humans and robots, under the assumption that the pain threshold is lower than the mild injury threshold. The pressure pain threshold for collision with a robot was measured in 90 male Korean adults using a homemade collision system. The pain thresholds were measured three times at 15 sites, including the forehead. The highest threshold was 196.1 ± 85.8 N/cm2 at the back of the hand, and the lowest was 65.1 ± 22.6 N/cm2 at an arm nerve. Moderate thresholds, i.e., 100-120 N/cm2, were noted on the forehead, neck muscle, ball of the thumb, and shin. The thresholds of participants < 30 years of age were lower, by 3-33%, than those of participants aged > 30 years. Thresholds differed by body mass index only at certain sites, including the shoulder joint, neck, and back of the hand. The pressure pain threshold depended on individual characteristics, body site, and age. The threshold relevant to potential human-robot collisions was determined to be between 65.1 ± 22.6 and 196.1 ± 85.8 N/cm2.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31048921
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215890
pii: PONE-D-18-33300
pmc: PMC6497239
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0215890Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Neuropediatrics. 2014 Apr;45(2):84-92
pubmed: 24122275
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Nutr Today. 2015 May;50(3):117-128
pubmed: 27340299