Investigating the Efficacy of an Individualized Alpha/Delta Neurofeedback Protocol in the Treatment of Chronic Tinnitus.
Journal
Neural plasticity
ISSN: 1687-5443
Titre abrégé: Neural Plast
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100883417
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
13
11
2018
revised:
24
01
2019
accepted:
10
02
2019
entrez:
4
5
2019
pubmed:
3
5
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
First attempts have demonstrated that the application of alpha/delta neurofeedback in the treatment of chronic tinnitus leads to a reduction of symptoms at the group level. However, recent research also suggests that chronic tinnitus is a decidedly heterogeneous phenomenon, one that requires treatment of distinct subgroups or even on an individual level. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate an individually adjusted alpha/delta neurofeedback protocol. Following previous studies, the delta band fixed between 3 and 4 Hz was chosen as the frequency for inhibition. However, unlike the previous studies, the frequency range for the rewarded alpha band was not fixed between 8 and 12 Hz but rather individually determined according to each patient's specific alpha peak frequency (IAF). Twenty-six chronic tinnitus patients participated in 15 weekly neurofeedback training sessions and extensive pre- and post-tests, as well as follow-up testing 3 and 6 months after training. The main outcome measures were tinnitus-related distress measured with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), tinnitus loudness, and pre- and post-training resting-state EEG activity in trained frequency bands. In Results, the neurofeedback protocol led to a significant reduction of tinnitus-related distress and tinnitus loudness. While distress remained on a low level even 6 months after the completion of training, loudness returned to baseline levels in the follow-up period. In addition, resting-state EEG activity showed an increase in the trained alpha/delta ratio over the course of the training. This ratio increase was related to training-induced changes of tinnitus-related distress as measured with TQ, mainly due to increases in the alpha frequency range. In sum, this study confirms the alpha/delta neurofeedback as a suitable option for the treatment of chronic tinnitus and represents a first step towards the development of individual neurofeedback protocols. This clinical trial was registered online at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02383147) and kofam.ch (SNCTP000001313).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31049052
doi: 10.1155/2019/3540898
pmc: PMC6458878
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02383147']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3540898Références
Hear Res. 1990 Sep;48(1-2):111-23
pubmed: 2249954
BMC Biol. 2008 Jan 16;6:4
pubmed: 18199318
Neurosci Lett. 2006 Feb 20;394(3):216-21
pubmed: 16343769
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2004 Dec;12(4):387-97
pubmed: 15614994
J Psychosom Res. 2012 Aug;73(2):112-21
pubmed: 22789414
Neurosci Lett. 2007 Oct 9;426(1):23-8
pubmed: 17888572
Prog Brain Res. 2007;166:525-36
pubmed: 17956816
Brain. 2012 Oct;135(Pt 10):3089-100
pubmed: 22975389
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999 Apr;29(2-3):169-95
pubmed: 10209231
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 Oct;16(10):632-42
pubmed: 26373470
PLoS Med. 2005 Jun;2(6):e153
pubmed: 15971936
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1972 Jul;33(1):89-95
pubmed: 4113278
Neurosci Lett. 2009 Apr 10;453(3):225-8
pubmed: 19429040
HNO. 1994 Mar;42(3):166-72
pubmed: 8175381
Am Psychol. 2017 Oct;72(7):679-688
pubmed: 29016171
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Aug 03;10:42
pubmed: 20682024
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jul;57(7):553-557
pubmed: 29490515
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2003 Apr;36(2):239-48
pubmed: 12856294
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2003 Apr;36(2):249-66, v-vi
pubmed: 12856295
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011 Dec;38(6):735-8
pubmed: 21592701
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Oct;48(5):1204-35
pubmed: 16411806
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;12(7):489-500
pubmed: 21568629
Brain Topogr. 2014 Jan;27(1):149-57
pubmed: 23700271
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 20;7:595
pubmed: 24065913
Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Apr;112(4):713-9
pubmed: 11275545
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Feb;72(2):184-7
pubmed: 2464490
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;50(7):780-9
pubmed: 19207632
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Mar 31;11:135
pubmed: 28408873
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63
pubmed: 18481363
J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 7;27(6):1479-84
pubmed: 17287523
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2003 Apr;36(2):383-8
pubmed: 12856305
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Jul;44:159-82
pubmed: 24690579
Trends Neurosci. 2016 Dec;39(12):799-812
pubmed: 27871729
Prog Brain Res. 2007;166:61-70
pubmed: 17956772
Trends Neurosci. 2004 Nov;27(11):676-82
pubmed: 15474168
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Sep;12(9):920-930
pubmed: 23948178
Front Neurol. 2015 Jun 09;6:124
pubmed: 26106362
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Dec 21;96(26):15222-7
pubmed: 10611366
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2009 Jul;40(3):180-9
pubmed: 19715181
Biofeedback Self Regul. 1995 Mar;20(1):83-99
pubmed: 7786929
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Jul;44:16-32
pubmed: 23597755
Neural Plast. 2014;2014:436146
pubmed: 24967106
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(3-4):371-8
pubmed: 17943012
Hear Res. 2009 Jul;253(1-2):15-31
pubmed: 19364527
Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Dec 01;9:386
pubmed: 29249959
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499