Development of the Wheelchair Interface Questionnaire and initial face and content validity.


Journal

African journal of disability
ISSN: 2223-9170
Titre abrégé: Afr J Disabil
Pays: South Africa
ID NLM: 101623460

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 28 03 2018
accepted: 27 09 2018
entrez: 4 5 2019
pubmed: 3 5 2019
medline: 3 5 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Because resources are limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), the development of outcome measures is of interest. Wheelchair outcome measures are useful to support evidence-based practice in wheelchair provision. The Wheelchair Interface Questionnaire (WIQ) is being developed to provide a professional perspective on the quality of the interface between a wheelchair and its user. This article discusses the development of the WIQ and its face and content validity. During field studies in Kenya, we sought to include professional report data on the wheelchair-user interface that could be analysed to inform design changes. None of the existing measures was focused on the interface between users and their wheelchairs. The WIQ was developed to meet this need. To investigate face and content validity, 24 experienced wheelchair professionals participated in a study that included two rounds of an online survey and a focus group in Kenya. Responses were categorised by topic and the WIQ was modified following each iteration. Participants affirmed the usefulness of a brief professional report measure to provide a snapshot of the user-wheelchair interface. Participants emphasised the importance of brevity, wide applicability and provision of specific feedback for wheelchair modification or design changes. The focus group agreed that the final version provided useful data and was applicable to virtually all wheelchair users in LMIC. These preliminary studies indicate initial face and content validity of the WIQ as a method for providing a professional perspective on the interface between a user and his or her wheelchair. Outcome measure; wheelchair assessment; user-wheelchair interface; wheelchair appropriateness; professional report.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Because resources are limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), the development of outcome measures is of interest. Wheelchair outcome measures are useful to support evidence-based practice in wheelchair provision.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
The Wheelchair Interface Questionnaire (WIQ) is being developed to provide a professional perspective on the quality of the interface between a wheelchair and its user. This article discusses the development of the WIQ and its face and content validity.
METHOD METHODS
During field studies in Kenya, we sought to include professional report data on the wheelchair-user interface that could be analysed to inform design changes. None of the existing measures was focused on the interface between users and their wheelchairs. The WIQ was developed to meet this need. To investigate face and content validity, 24 experienced wheelchair professionals participated in a study that included two rounds of an online survey and a focus group in Kenya.
RESULTS RESULTS
Responses were categorised by topic and the WIQ was modified following each iteration. Participants affirmed the usefulness of a brief professional report measure to provide a snapshot of the user-wheelchair interface. Participants emphasised the importance of brevity, wide applicability and provision of specific feedback for wheelchair modification or design changes. The focus group agreed that the final version provided useful data and was applicable to virtually all wheelchair users in LMIC.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
These preliminary studies indicate initial face and content validity of the WIQ as a method for providing a professional perspective on the interface between a user and his or her wheelchair.
KEYWORDS BACKGROUND
Outcome measure; wheelchair assessment; user-wheelchair interface; wheelchair appropriateness; professional report.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31049310
doi: 10.4102/ajod.v8i0.520
pii: AJOD-8-520
pmc: PMC6489171
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

520

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest resulting from any financial or personal relationships.

Références

J Orthod. 2003 Sep;30(3):245-52
pubmed: 14530423
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 Jul-Aug;40(4):301-7
pubmed: 15074441
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):794-804
pubmed: 15129405
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S50-7
pubmed: 17909384
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jun;89(6):1177-86
pubmed: 18503817
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Aug;84(2):281-3
pubmed: 18580868
Assist Technol. 2008 Summer;20(2):61-72
pubmed: 18646429
CMAJ. 2008 Jul 29;179(3):245-52
pubmed: 18663204
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009 Jan;4(1):42-57
pubmed: 19172480
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007 Sep;2(5):275-85
pubmed: 19263533
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007 May;2(3):159-68
pubmed: 19266635
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(1):57-66
pubmed: 20809874
Indian J Med Res. 2010 Nov;132:623-6
pubmed: 21150015
Res Nurs Health. 1990 Aug;13(4):227-36
pubmed: 2197679
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 May;8(3):213-9
pubmed: 22612721
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jul 17;14:309
pubmed: 25034517
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Nov;12(8):852-856
pubmed: 28100094
Afr J Disabil. 2016 Jun 10;5(1):222
pubmed: 28730049
Afr J Disabil. 2017 Sep 08;6:332
pubmed: 28936413

Auteurs

Karen Rispin (K)

Department of Biology and Kinesiology, LeTourneau University, Longview, United States.

Abigail B Davis (AB)

Department of Biology and Kinesiology, LeTourneau University, Longview, United States.

Vicki L Sheafer (VL)

Department of Psychology, LeTourneau University, Longview, United States.

Joy Wee (J)

Canadian Association of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kingston, Canada.

Classifications MeSH