Mirror Therapy Using Gesture Recognition for Upper Limb Function, Neck Discomfort, and Quality of Life After Chronic Stroke: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
Activities of Daily Living
Adult
Aged
Exercise Therapy
/ methods
Female
Gestures
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neck Pain
/ therapy
Quality of Life
Recovery of Function
Single-Blind Method
Stroke
/ physiopathology
Stroke Rehabilitation
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Upper Extremity
/ physiopathology
Video Games
Virtual Reality
Journal
Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research
ISSN: 1643-3750
Titre abrégé: Med Sci Monit
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9609063
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 May 2019
03 May 2019
Historique:
entrez:
4
5
2019
pubmed:
6
5
2019
medline:
19
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND Mirror therapy for stroke patients was reported to be effective in improving upper-extremity motor function and daily life activity performance. In addition, game-based virtual reality can be realized using a gesture recognition (GR) device, and various tasks can be presented. Therefore, this study investigated changes in upper-extremity motor function, quality of life, and neck discomfort when using a GR device for mirror therapy to observe the upper extremities reflected in the mirror. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 36 subjects with chronic stroke were randomly divided into 3 groups: GR mirror therapy (n=12), conventional mirror therapy (n=12), and control (n=12) groups. The GR therapy group performed 3D motion input device-based mirror therapy, the conventional mirror therapy group underwent general mirror therapy, and the control group underwent sham therapy. Each group underwent 15 (30 min/d) intervention sessions (3 d/wk for 5 weeks). All subjects were assessed by manual function test, neck discomfort score, and Short-Form 8 in pre- and post-test. RESULTS Upper-extremity function, depression, and quality of life in the GR mirror therapy group were significantly better than in the control group. The changes of neck discomfort in the conventional mirror therapy and control groups were significantly greater than in the GR mirror therapy group. CONCLUSIONS We found that GR device-based mirror therapy is an intervention that improves upper-extremity function, neck discomfort, and quality of life in patients with chronic stroke.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31050660
pii: 914095
doi: 10.12659/MSM.914095
pmc: PMC6511112
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3271-3278Références
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Stroke. 2003 Mar;34(3):801-5
pubmed: 12624313
Clin Rehabil. 2004 May;18(3):300-8
pubmed: 15137561
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3-5):371-86
pubmed: 15502277
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004 May;41(3A):293-312
pubmed: 15543447
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004 Dec 10;1(1):10
pubmed: 15679945
Phys Ther. 2007 Apr;87(4):408-17
pubmed: 17341512
Neurosci Lett. 2007 May 29;419(2):108-12
pubmed: 17481817
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009 Jul-Aug;49(1):118-22
pubmed: 18621426
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(17-18):1579-86
pubmed: 21174615
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Jun;26(5):456-62
pubmed: 22235059
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Aug;91(8):689-96, quiz 697-700
pubmed: 22469877
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013 Jun;49(3):311-7
pubmed: 23480975
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):171-88
pubmed: 23611858
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015 Aug;22(4):306-16
pubmed: 26258456
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jul;27(7):2057-60
pubmed: 26311925
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Mar 18;16(3):
pubmed: 26999149
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Mar;31(3):340-350
pubmed: 27029939
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Sep;15(10):1019-27
pubmed: 27365261
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Jan;14(1):73-8
pubmed: 2913672
Nature. 1995 Oct 12;377(6549):489-90
pubmed: 7566144
BMJ. 1993 May 29;306(6890):1437-40
pubmed: 8518639
Stroke. 1998 Apr;29(4):785-92
pubmed: 9550512