A pharmacokinetic assessment of optimal dosing, preparation, and chronotherapy of aspirin in pregnancy.


Journal

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1097-6868
Titre abrégé: Am J Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370476

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2019
Historique:
received: 08 01 2019
revised: 16 04 2019
accepted: 24 04 2019
pubmed: 6 5 2019
medline: 25 2 2020
entrez: 4 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The benefit of aspirin in preventing preeclampsia is well established; however, studies over the years have demonstrated variability in outcomes with its use. Potential contributing factors to this variation in efficacy include dosing, time of dosing, and preparation of aspirin. We aimed to compare the difference in pharmacokinetics of aspirin, through its major active metabolite, salicylic acid, in pregnant women and nonpregnant women, and to examine the effect of dose (100 mg vs 150 mg), preparation (enteric coated vs non-enteric-coated), and chronotherapy of aspirin (morning vs evening) between the 2 groups. Twelve high-risk pregnant women and 3 nonpregnant women were enrolled in this study. Pregnant women were in 1 of 4 groups (100 mg enteric coated, 100 mg non-enteric-coated, 150 mg non-enteric-coated morning dosing, and 150 mg non-enteric-coated evening dosing), whereas nonpregnant women undertook each of the 4 dosing schedules with at least a 30-day washout period. Blood samples were collected at baseline (before ingestion) and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours after ingestion of aspirin. Plasma obtained was analyzed for salicylic acid levels by means of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic values of area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours point of maximum concentration, time of maximum concentration, volume of distribution, clearance, and elimination half-life were analyzed for statistical significance with SPSS v25 software. Pregnant women had a 40% ± 4% reduction in area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours (P < .01) and 29% ± 3% reduction in point of maximum concentration (P < .01) with a 44% ± 8% increase in clearance (P < .01) in comparison to that in nonpregnant women when 100 mg aspirin was administered. The reduction in the area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours, however, was minimized with the use of 150 mg aspirin in pregnant women, with which the area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours was closer to that achieved with the use of 100 mg aspirin in nonpregnant women. There was a 4-hour delay (P < .01) in the time of maximum concentration, a 47% ± 3% reduction in point of maximum concentration (P < .01) and a 48% ± 1% increase in volume of distribution (P < .01) with the use of 100 mg enteric-coated aspirin compared to non-enteric-coated aspirin, with no difference in the overall area under the curve. There was no difference in the pharmacokinetics of aspirin between morning and evening dosing. There is a reduction in the total drug metabolite concentration of aspirin in pregnancy, and therefore a dose adjustment is potentially required in pregnant women. This is likely due to the altered pharmacokinetics of aspirin in pregnancy, with an increase in clearance. There was no difference in the total drug metabolite concentration of aspirin between enteric-coated and non-enteric-coated aspirin and between morning and evening dosing of aspirin. Further pharmacodynamic and clinical studies are required to examine the clinical relevance of these pharmacokinetic findings.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The benefit of aspirin in preventing preeclampsia is well established; however, studies over the years have demonstrated variability in outcomes with its use. Potential contributing factors to this variation in efficacy include dosing, time of dosing, and preparation of aspirin.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to compare the difference in pharmacokinetics of aspirin, through its major active metabolite, salicylic acid, in pregnant women and nonpregnant women, and to examine the effect of dose (100 mg vs 150 mg), preparation (enteric coated vs non-enteric-coated), and chronotherapy of aspirin (morning vs evening) between the 2 groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Twelve high-risk pregnant women and 3 nonpregnant women were enrolled in this study. Pregnant women were in 1 of 4 groups (100 mg enteric coated, 100 mg non-enteric-coated, 150 mg non-enteric-coated morning dosing, and 150 mg non-enteric-coated evening dosing), whereas nonpregnant women undertook each of the 4 dosing schedules with at least a 30-day washout period. Blood samples were collected at baseline (before ingestion) and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours after ingestion of aspirin. Plasma obtained was analyzed for salicylic acid levels by means of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic values of area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours point of maximum concentration, time of maximum concentration, volume of distribution, clearance, and elimination half-life were analyzed for statistical significance with SPSS v25 software.
RESULTS
Pregnant women had a 40% ± 4% reduction in area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours (P < .01) and 29% ± 3% reduction in point of maximum concentration (P < .01) with a 44% ± 8% increase in clearance (P < .01) in comparison to that in nonpregnant women when 100 mg aspirin was administered. The reduction in the area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours, however, was minimized with the use of 150 mg aspirin in pregnant women, with which the area under the curve from time point 0 to 24 hours was closer to that achieved with the use of 100 mg aspirin in nonpregnant women. There was a 4-hour delay (P < .01) in the time of maximum concentration, a 47% ± 3% reduction in point of maximum concentration (P < .01) and a 48% ± 1% increase in volume of distribution (P < .01) with the use of 100 mg enteric-coated aspirin compared to non-enteric-coated aspirin, with no difference in the overall area under the curve. There was no difference in the pharmacokinetics of aspirin between morning and evening dosing.
CONCLUSION
There is a reduction in the total drug metabolite concentration of aspirin in pregnancy, and therefore a dose adjustment is potentially required in pregnant women. This is likely due to the altered pharmacokinetics of aspirin in pregnancy, with an increase in clearance. There was no difference in the total drug metabolite concentration of aspirin between enteric-coated and non-enteric-coated aspirin and between morning and evening dosing of aspirin. Further pharmacodynamic and clinical studies are required to examine the clinical relevance of these pharmacokinetic findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31051121
pii: S0002-9378(19)30612-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.027
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors 0
Tablets, Enteric-Coated 0
Aspirin R16CO5Y76E

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

255.e1-255.e9

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Renuka Shanmugalingam (R)

School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, NSW, Australia; Department of Renal Medicine, South Western Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia; Heart Research Institute, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Women's Health Initiative Translational Unit (WHITU), South Western Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: Renuka.shanmugalingam@health.nsw.gov.au.

XiaoSuo Wang (X)

Bosch Mass Spectrometry Facility, Bosch Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Gerald Münch (G)

Pharmacology Unit, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, NSW, Australia.

Ian Fulcher (I)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Liverpool Hospital, NSW, Australia.

Gaksoo Lee (G)

Department of Renal Medicine, South Western Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia; Women's Health Initiative Translational Unit (WHITU), South Western Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia.

Katrina Chau (K)

Heart Research Institute, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Bei Xu (B)

Heart Research Institute, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Roshika Kumar (R)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Liverpool Hospital, NSW, Australia.

Annemarie Hennessy (A)

School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, NSW, Australia; Department of Renal Medicine, South Western Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia; Heart Research Institute, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Women's Health Initiative Translational Unit (WHITU), South Western Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia.

Angela Makris (A)

School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, NSW, Australia; Department of Renal Medicine, South Western Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia; Heart Research Institute, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Women's Health Initiative Translational Unit (WHITU), South Western Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH