Diagnostic ability of artificial intelligence using deep learning analysis of cyst fluid in differentiating malignant from benign pancreatic cystic lesions.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 05 2019
03 05 2019
Historique:
received:
02
11
2018
accepted:
03
04
2019
entrez:
5
5
2019
pubmed:
6
5
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions remains challenging. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic ability of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytology, and artificial intelligence (AI) by deep learning using cyst fluid in differentiating malignant from benign cystic lesions. We retrospectively reviewed 85 patients who underwent pancreatic cyst fluid analysis of surgical specimens or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens. AI using deep learning was used to construct a diagnostic algorithm. CEA, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 125, amylase in the cyst fluid, sex, cyst location, connection of the pancreatic duct and cyst, type of cyst, and cytology were keyed into the AI algorithm, and the malignant predictive value of the output was calculated. Area under receiver-operating characteristics curves for the diagnostic ability of malignant cystic lesions were 0.719 (CEA), 0.739 (cytology), and 0.966 (AI). In the diagnostic ability of malignant cystic lesions, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of AI were 95.7%, 91.9%, and 92.9%, respectively. AI sensitivity was higher than that of CEA (60.9%, p = 0.021) and cytology (47.8%, p = 0.001). AI accuracy was also higher than CEA (71.8%, p < 0.001) and cytology (85.9%, p = 0.210). AI may improve the diagnostic ability in differentiating malignant from benign pancreatic cystic lesions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31053726
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43314-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-43314-3
pmc: PMC6499768
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
0
Amylases
EC 3.2.1.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6893Références
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Nov;18(11):1323-4
pubmed: 14535994
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44
pubmed: 26017442
Pancreas. 2011 Oct;40(7):1024-8
pubmed: 21775920
Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Feb;39(2):179-87
pubmed: 25517958
Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):466-75
pubmed: 24022439
Mod Pathol. 2010 Nov;23(11):1467-76
pubmed: 20802468
Endoscopy. 2011 Jul;43(7):585-90
pubmed: 21611945
JOP. 2012 Jul 10;13(4):409-13
pubmed: 22797397
Dig Liver Dis. 2013 Nov;45(11):920-6
pubmed: 23790480
Gastroenterology. 2004 May;126(5):1330-6
pubmed: 15131794
Am J Surg Pathol. 1998 Jun;22(6):704-8
pubmed: 9630177
Cancer. 2008 Apr 25;114(2):102-10
pubmed: 18260088
Gut. 2019 Jan;68(1):94-100
pubmed: 29066576
Clin Endosc. 2015 Jan;48(1):31-8
pubmed: 25674524
Gastroenterology. 2018 Feb;154(3):568-575
pubmed: 29042219
Sci Rep. 2016 May 23;6:26286
pubmed: 27212078
Endoscopy. 2014 May;46(5):382-7
pubmed: 24619804
Am J Surg Pathol. 1999 Apr;23(4):410-22
pubmed: 10199470
Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):115-118
pubmed: 28117445
JOP. 2011 Jul 08;12(4):384-8
pubmed: 21737901
Pancreas. 2004 Oct;29(3):212-7
pubmed: 15367887
Pancreatology. 2012 May-Jun;12(3):183-97
pubmed: 22687371
Gut. 2016 Feb;65(2):305-12
pubmed: 26045140
Pancreas. 2011 Jan;40(1):42-5
pubmed: 20966811
EBioMedicine. 2017 Nov;25:106-111
pubmed: 29056541
Exp Mol Pathol. 2012 Dec;93(3):345-9
pubmed: 22902940
Surg Pathol Clin. 2016 Dec;9(4):677-684
pubmed: 27926366
Cancer. 2006 Jun 25;108(3):163-73
pubmed: 16550572
Radiology. 2006 Feb;238(2):560-9
pubmed: 16436817
Pancreas. 2011 Jan;40(1):67-71
pubmed: 20924309
Pancreas. 2016 Jul;45(6):870-5
pubmed: 26646270
Cancer Lett. 2016 Nov 1;382(1):110-117
pubmed: 27241666
Pancreatology. 2014 Nov-Dec;14(6):503-9
pubmed: 25458668
Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Jan;47(1):42-9
pubmed: 9468422
Mod Pathol. 2002 May;15(5):492-501
pubmed: 12011254