ACR Appropriateness Criteria
AUC
Appropriate Use Criteria
Appropriateness Criteria
Cervical pain
Cervical radiculopathy
Cervicalgia
Cervicodynia
Cervicogenic headache
Diagnostic imaging
Neck pain
Journal
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
ISSN: 1558-349X
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101190326
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
25
01
2019
accepted:
08
02
2019
entrez:
6
5
2019
pubmed:
6
5
2019
medline:
15
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Nontraumatic neck pain is a leading cause of disability, with nearly 50% of individuals experiencing ongoing or recurrent symptoms. Radiographs are appropriate as initial imaging for cervical or neck pain in the absence of "red flag" symptoms or if there are unchanging chronic symptoms; however, spondylotic changes are commonly identified and may result in both false-positive and false-negative findings. Noncontrast CT can be complementary to radiographs for evaluation of new or changing symptoms in the setting of prior cervical spine surgery or in the assessment of extent of ossification in the posterior longitudinal ligament. Noncontrast MRI is usually appropriate for assessment of new or increasing radiculopathy due to improved nerve root definition. MRI without and with contrast is usually appropriate in patients with new or increasing cervical or neck pain or radiculopathy in the setting of suspected infection or known malignancy. Imaging may be appropriate; however, it is not always indicated for evaluation of cervicogenic headache without neurologic deficit. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31054759
pii: S1546-1440(19)30164-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.023
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Practice Guideline
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S57-S76Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.