"A Résumé for the Baby": Biosocial Precarity and Care of Substance-Using, Pregnant Women in San Francisco.
Care
Moral anthropology
Obstetrics
Precarity
Substance use in pregnancy
Journal
Culture, medicine and psychiatry
ISSN: 1573-076X
Titre abrégé: Cult Med Psychiatry
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7707467
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
6
5
2019
medline:
23
9
2020
entrez:
6
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the United States, the historical condemnation and punitive legal consequences of substance use during pregnancy-ranging from incarceration to termination of parental custody of a newborn-render pregnant women in state of biosocial precarity. Yet pregnant women who use illicit substances who desire to parent must generate a legible narrative for bureaucratic groups, such as Child Protective Services, through engagement with biomedical care in order to demonstrate parental capacity. Based on longitudinal interviews with pregnant women who were actively using illicit substances and attempting to parent after delivery, we posit that the relationship between biosocial precarity and biomedical care is a procedural interaction that is rooted in the potential to parent, described as the ability to have a "take-home baby." In order to achieve this goal, the need for engagement in biomedical care and the creation of a biomedical narrative, described as a "résumé for the baby" is required. The relationship between care and biosocial precarity is a unique, underdeveloped concept within medical anthropology and has important consequences not only for the ethical turn within anthropology, but also how applied researchers consider engagement with this highly marginalized, vulnerable population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31055757
doi: 10.1007/s11013-019-09634-9
pii: 10.1007/s11013-019-09634-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
35-55Subventions
Organisme : School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
ID : Resident Research Grant 2015-2016
Références
Am J Public Health. 2016 Dec;106(12):2127-2129
pubmed: 27831792
N Engl J Med. 1985 Sep 12;313(11):666-9
pubmed: 4022059
Biosocieties. 2017 Jun;12(2):217-238
pubmed: 28690668
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;201(6):560.e1-6
pubmed: 19762005
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jun;159:108-15
pubmed: 27179146
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):751-5
pubmed: 21343793
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):234-8
pubmed: 26241291
Lancet. 2017 Mar 4;389(10072):941-950
pubmed: 28271845
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;117(1):200-1
pubmed: 21173672
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;131(1):e43-e48
pubmed: 29266079
J Health Soc Behav. 1988 Dec;29(4):357-75
pubmed: 3253326
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;40(4):664-686
pubmed: 27272904
Med Anthropol. 2011 Jul;30(4):339-62
pubmed: 21777121
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;24(2):165-95
pubmed: 10885786
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):e81-e94
pubmed: 28742676
Med Anthropol Q. 1998 Sep;12(3):273-97
pubmed: 9746895
Med Anthropol Q. 2017 Mar;31(1):40-59
pubmed: 27113268
Med Anthropol Q. 1992 Mar;6(1):49-73
pubmed: 11659464
Soc Stud Sci. 2015 Oct;45(5):625-41
pubmed: 26630814
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Sep;66(3):442-6
pubmed: 4022506
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):718-26
pubmed: 25198262
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;128(2):396-9
pubmed: 27400011
J Addict Dis. 2010 Apr;29(2):231-44
pubmed: 20407979