Randomized control trial comparing the effect of cilostazol and aspirin on changes in carotid intima-medial thickness.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aspirin
/ administration & dosage
Atherosclerosis
/ diagnosis
Carotid Intima-Media Thickness
Cilostazol
/ administration & dosage
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ complications
Disease Progression
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Phosphodiesterase 3 Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
Anti-platelet
Aspirin
Cardiovascular disease (CVD)
Carotid IMT
Cilostazol
Type 2 Diabetes
Journal
Heart and vessels
ISSN: 1615-2573
Titre abrégé: Heart Vessels
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 8511258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
26
02
2019
accepted:
26
04
2019
pubmed:
6
5
2019
medline:
25
2
2020
entrez:
7
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Antiplatelet drugs are effective in preventing recurrence of atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. However, the efficacy and usefulness of antiplatelet drugs on the progression of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), a marker for evaluating early atherosclerotic vascular disease, has not been analyzed. We conducted a prospective, randomized, open, 36-month trial comparing cilostazol vs. aspirin. A total of 415 T2D patients (age range 38-83 years; 206 females) without macrovascular complications were randomized to either an aspirin (100 mg/day) or cilostazol (200 mg/day) treatment. Patients underwent B-mode ultrasonography annually to assess the IMT and serum levels of inflammatory markers were measured before and after each treatment. Potential confounders were statistically adjusted, and included lipid profiles, HbA1c, body mass index, waist circumference, anti-hypertensive and statin medications. The decrease in mean left, maximum left, mean right and maximum right IMT were significantly greater with cilostazol compared with aspirin (- 0.094 ± 0.186 mm vs. 0.006 ± 0.220 mm, p < 0.001; - 0.080 ± 0.214 mm vs. 0.040 ± 0.264 mm, p < 0.001; - 0.064 ± 0.183 mm vs. 0.004 ± 0.203 mm, p = 0.015; - 0.058 ± 0.225 mm vs. 0.023 ± 0.248 mm, p = 0.022, respectively). And these differences remained significant after adjustment of potential confounders. Compared with aspirin, cilostazol treatment was associated with significantly increased HDL cholesterol (p = 0.039) and 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels (p = 0.001). Cilostazol treatment was associated with significantly lowered IMT in T2D patients compared to aspirin, independent of conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Cilostazol may inhibit plaque formation and have beneficial effects on atherosclerosis through vasodilatory and antiplatelet effects.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31056733
doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01421-1
pii: 10.1007/s00380-019-01421-1
doi:
Substances chimiques
Phosphodiesterase 3 Inhibitors
0
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
0
Cilostazol
N7Z035406B
Aspirin
R16CO5Y76E
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1758-1768Subventions
Organisme : Ministry of Health and Welfare
ID : A102065
Références
Acta Neurol Scand. 2007 Jun;115(6):409-12
pubmed: 17511850
Diabetologia. 2002 Feb;45(2):188-94
pubmed: 11935149
Am J Med. 2010 Apr;123(4):335-41
pubmed: 20362753
Clin Radiol. 2011 May;66(5):393-8
pubmed: 21324442
Thromb Res. 2000 Feb 15;97(4):239-45
pubmed: 10674411
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Jul;50(7):801-7
pubmed: 9253391
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44476
pubmed: 22957074
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 18;11(2):e0148630
pubmed: 26890789
Circulation. 1998 Aug 18;98(7):678-86
pubmed: 9715861
Arterioscler Thromb. 1994 Feb;14(2):261-4
pubmed: 8305418
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Oct;94(10):4023-30
pubmed: 19584181
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Feb;18(2):613-20
pubmed: 17202417
Angiology. 2011 Apr;62(3):231-6
pubmed: 20688786
JAMA. 2008 Nov 12;300(18):2134-41
pubmed: 18997198
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 23;339(4):229-34
pubmed: 9673301
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2015 Jun 29;3:1900410
pubmed: 27170894
Hypertension. 2011 Jan;57(1):63-9
pubmed: 21115878
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998 Dec;18(12):1942-7
pubmed: 9848888
Lancet. 2013 Oct 19;382(9901):1329-40
pubmed: 23915883
Atherosclerosis. 2003 Dec;171(2):337-42
pubmed: 14644405
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010 Feb;64(2):203-9
pubmed: 19953106
Diabet Med. 2008 Mar;25(3):320-5
pubmed: 18279409
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S86-S104
pubmed: 29222380
Diabetes Metab J. 2011 Oct;35(5):504-12
pubmed: 22111042
BMJ. 2002 Jan 12;324(7329):71-86
pubmed: 11786451
Int J Stroke. 2015 Jan;10(1):123-7
pubmed: 25394855
BMJ. 2008 Oct 16;337:a1840
pubmed: 18927173
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(1):63-70
pubmed: 18511873
Eur Heart J. 2007 Aug;28(16):1925-7
pubmed: 17604291
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Sep;57(9):1595-603
pubmed: 19549021
Circulation. 2010 Jun 15;121(23):2584-91
pubmed: 20516379
Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Aug 1;134(3):250-6
pubmed: 1877584
J Intern Med. 1991 Mar;229(3):225-31
pubmed: 2007840
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2001 Apr;52(1):45-53
pubmed: 11182215
Circulation. 2017 Feb 14;135(7):659-670
pubmed: 27881565
Circulation. 1997 Dec 2;96(11):3849-59
pubmed: 9403607